Frank Shane C, Steyaert Sam M J G, Swenson Jon E, Storch Ilse, Kindberg Jonas, Barck Hanna, Zedrosser Andreas
Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Environmental and Health Studies, Telemark University College, Bø NO-3800, Norway.
Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, As NO-1432, Norway.
For Ecol Manage. 2015 Jul 15;348:164-173. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.03.051.
Forest management alters habitat characteristics, resulting in various effects among and within species. It is crucial to understand how habitat alteration through forest management (e.g. clearcutting) affects animal populations, particularly with unknown future conditions (e.g. climate change). In Sweden, brown bears () forage on carpenter ants () during summer, and may select for this food source within clearcuts. To assess carpenter ant occurrence and brown bear selection of carpenter ants, we sampled 6999 coarse woody debris (CWD) items within 1019 plots, of which 902 were within clearcuts (forests ⩽30 years of age) and 117 plots outside clearcuts (forests >30 years of age). We related various CWD and site characteristics to the presence or absence of carpenter ant galleries (nests) and bear foraging sign at three spatial scales: the CWD, plot, and clearcut scale. We tested whether both absolute and relative counts (the latter controlling for the number of CWD items) of galleries and bear sign in plots were higher inside or outside clearcuts. Absolute counts were higher inside than outside clearcuts for galleries (mean counts; inside: 1.8, outside: 0.8). CWD was also higher inside (mean: 6.8) than outside clearcuts (mean: 4.0). However, even after controlling for more CWD inside clearcuts, relative counts were higher inside than outside clearcuts for both galleries (mean counts; inside: 0.3, outside: 0.2) and bear sign (mean counts; inside: 0.03, outside: 0.01). Variables at the CWD scale best explained gallery and bear sign presence than variables at the plot or clearcut level, but bear selection was influenced by clearcut age. CWD circumference was important for both carpenter ant and bear sign presence. CWD hardness was most important for carpenter ant selection. However, the most important predictor for bear sign was the presence or absence of carpenter ant galleries. Bears had a high foraging "success" rate (⩾88%) in foraging CWD where galleries also occurred, which was assessed by summing CWD items with the concurrence of bear sign and galleries, divided by the sum of all CWD with bear sign. Clearcuts appeared to increase the occurrence of a relatively important summer food item, the carpenter ant, on Swedish managed forests for the brown bear. However, the potential benefit of this increase can only be determined from a better understanding of the seasonal and interannual variation of the availability and use of other important brown bear food items, berries (e.g. and spp.), as well as other primary needs for bears (e.g. secure habitat and denning habitat), within the landscape mosaic of managed forests.
森林管理会改变栖息地特征,从而在物种之间以及物种内部产生各种影响。了解森林管理(如皆伐)导致的栖息地改变如何影响动物种群至关重要,尤其是在未来情况不明(如气候变化)的情况下。在瑞典,棕熊在夏季以木匠蚁为食,并且可能会在皆伐区域内选择这种食物来源。为了评估木匠蚁的出现情况以及棕熊对木匠蚁的选择,我们在1019个样地内对6999个粗木质残体(CWD)进行了采样,其中902个在皆伐区域内(树龄小于等于30年的森林),117个样地在皆伐区域外(树龄大于30年的森林)。我们在三个空间尺度上,即CWD、样地和皆伐尺度,将各种CWD和样地特征与木匠蚁蚁道(巢穴)的存在与否以及熊的觅食迹象联系起来。我们测试了样地内蚁道和熊觅食迹象的绝对数量和相对数量(后者控制CWD项目的数量)在皆伐区域内还是外更高。蚁道的绝对数量在皆伐区域内高于外(平均数量;皆伐区域内:1.8,皆伐区域外:0.8)。CWD数量在皆伐区域内也高于外(平均:6.8)(皆伐区域外:4.0)。然而,即使在控制了皆伐区域内更多的CWD之后,蚁道的相对数量(平均数量;皆伐区域内:0.3,皆伐区域外:0.2)和熊觅食迹象的相对数量(平均数量;皆伐区域内:0.03,皆伐区域外:0.01)在皆伐区域内仍高于外。与样地或皆伐尺度的变量相比,CWD尺度的变量对蚁道和熊觅食迹象存在的解释效果最佳,但熊的选择受皆伐年龄的影响。CWD周长对木匠蚁和熊觅食迹象的存在都很重要。CWD硬度对木匠蚁的选择最为重要。然而,熊觅食迹象的最重要预测因子是木匠蚁蚁道的存在与否。在有蚁道出现的CWD中,熊觅食的“成功率”较高(≥88%),这是通过将有熊觅食迹象和蚁道同时出现的CWD项目数量之和除以所有有熊觅食迹象的CWD数量之和来评估的。皆伐似乎增加了瑞典人工林中棕熊一种相对重要的夏季食物——木匠蚁的出现频率。然而,这种增加的潜在益处只能通过更好地了解其他重要的棕熊食物(如浆果,如 和 属物种)的可获得性和利用的季节和年际变化,以及人工林景观镶嵌体中熊的其他基本需求(如安全栖息地和筑巢栖息地)来确定。