Liira Helena, Saarelma Osmo, Callaghan Margaret, Harbour Robin, Jousimaa Jukkapekka, Kunnamo Ilkka, Loudon Kirsty, Mcfarlane Emma, Treweek Shaun
a General Practice, School of Primary, Aboriginal and Rural Health Care, University of Western Australia.
b University of Helsinki, Department of General Practice , and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Unit of Primary Health Care , Helsinki , Finland.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2015;33(3):212-9. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2015.1067517. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
Evidence-based clinical guidelines could support shared decision-making and help patients to participate actively in their care. However, it is not well known how patients view guidelines as a source of health information. This qualitative study aimed to assess what patients know about guidelines, and what they think of their presentation formats.
What is the role of guidelines as health information for patients and how could the implementation of evidence-based information for patients be improved?
A qualitative study with focus groups that were built around a semi-structured topic guide. Focus groups were audiotaped and transcribed and analysed using a phenomenographic approach.
Five focus groups were carried out in 2012 with a total of 23 participants. Patients searched for health information from the Internet or consulted health professionals or their personal networks. The concepts of guidelines included instructions or standards for health professionals, information given by a health professional to the patient, and material to protect and promote the interests of patients. Some patients did not have a concept for guidelines. Patients felt that health information was abundant and its quality sometimes difficult to assess. They respected conciseness, clarity, clear structure, and specialists or well-known organizations as authors of health information. Patients would like health professionals to deliver and clarify written materials to them or point out to them the relevant Internet sites.
The concept of guidelines was not well known among our interviewees; however, they expressed an interest in having more communication on health information, both written information and clarifications with their health professionals.
循证临床指南有助于支持共同决策,并帮助患者积极参与自身护理。然而,患者如何看待将指南作为健康信息来源却鲜为人知。这项定性研究旨在评估患者对指南的了解程度,以及他们对指南呈现形式的看法。
指南作为患者健康信息的作用是什么,如何改进为患者实施循证信息?
采用基于半结构化主题指南的焦点小组进行定性研究。焦点小组进行了录音、转录,并采用现象学方法进行分析。
2012年开展了5个焦点小组,共有23名参与者。患者从互联网搜索健康信息,或咨询健康专业人员或其个人社交网络。指南的概念包括针对健康专业人员的指示或标准、健康专业人员向患者提供的信息,以及保护和促进患者利益的材料。一些患者没有指南的概念。患者感到健康信息丰富,但其质量有时难以评估。他们看重简洁性、清晰度、清晰的结构,以及作为健康信息作者的专家或知名组织。患者希望健康专业人员为他们提供并解释书面材料,或向他们指出相关的互联网站点。
我们的受访者对指南的概念了解不多;然而,他们表示有兴趣就健康信息进行更多交流,包括书面信息以及与健康专业人员的沟通。