• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于残疾人获取健康信息的情况以及未来改善这种获取情况的方式的焦点小组访谈。

Focus group interview regarding the accessibility of health information for people with disabilities and means of improving this accessibility in the future.

作者信息

Shon Changwoo, Jeon Boyoung, Lim Jae Hee, Park So Youn, Lee Ye-Rin, Kim Young-Eun, Park Saengryeol, Lee Na-Eun, Oh In-Hwan

机构信息

Department of Urban Society Research, The Seoul Institute.

Division of Health Service for the Disabled, National Rehabilitation Center.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(8):e19188. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019188.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000019188
PMID:32080101
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7034670/
Abstract

This study concerns the accessibility of health information for people with disabilities. More specifically, by interviewing policy elites who have backgrounds in this area, we seek to obtain their opinions regarding the type of information people with disabilities require, and people with disabilities overall awareness of such information. Based on the information obtained, we also aim to identify methods of improving this accessibility.A focus group interview was conducted involving policy elites who had previously participated in decision-making processes for health policy. These elites were sourced from the fields of academia, medicine, and government. Content analysis was performed using NVivo 10, which is a computer-assisted/aided qualitative data-analysis software.The focus-group participants felt that relevant information for people with disabilities is provided in a fragmentary manner through several channels that have relatively low reliability, which creates difficulties for a significant portion of the target recipients. Discussions regarding the type of health information required by people with disabilities yielded the following topic clusters: information regarding health-care providers who specialize in specific disability types and regarding health behaviors for certain lifecycles, and information that helps people with disabilities return to society. Further, the focus group recommended 2 means of providing essential health information to PWDs in the future. As short-term strategies, the participants proposed simplifying the existing, fragmented information channels and the creation of a comprehensive web-based information portal with an associated call center. As a long-term strategy, they proposed the development of smart-device-based information services that are tailored to the needs of individuals.Efforts to reduce the disparities in health information for people with disabilities are essential for addressing the existing inequality regarding the availability of health information.

摘要

本研究关注残疾人获取健康信息的情况。更具体地说,通过采访在该领域有背景的政策精英,我们试图获取他们对残疾人所需信息类型以及残疾人对这类信息的总体认知的看法。基于所获得的信息,我们还旨在确定改善这种可及性的方法。

我们对曾参与健康政策决策过程的政策精英进行了焦点小组访谈。这些精英来自学术界、医学领域和政府部门。使用NVivo 10进行了内容分析,NVivo 10是一款计算机辅助定性数据分析软件。

焦点小组参与者认为,通过几个可靠性相对较低的渠道以零散方式为残疾人提供相关信息,这给很大一部分目标受众带来了困难。关于残疾人所需健康信息类型的讨论产生了以下主题类别:关于专门针对特定残疾类型的医疗服务提供者的信息、关于某些生命周期的健康行为的信息,以及有助于残疾人重返社会的信息。此外,焦点小组建议了未来向残疾人提供基本健康信息的两种方式。作为短期策略,参与者提议简化现有的零散信息渠道,并创建一个带有相关呼叫中心的综合性网络信息门户。作为长期策略,他们提议开发基于智能设备的、根据个人需求量身定制的信息服务。

努力减少残疾人健康信息方面的差距对于解决健康信息可得性方面现有的不平等至关重要。

相似文献

1
Focus group interview regarding the accessibility of health information for people with disabilities and means of improving this accessibility in the future.关于残疾人获取健康信息的情况以及未来改善这种获取情况的方式的焦点小组访谈。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(8):e19188. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019188.
2
"": access to HIV information and services among persons with disabilities in Ghana, Uganda, and Zambia."": 加纳、乌干达和赞比亚残疾人获取艾滋病毒信息和服务的情况。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Feb;42(3):335-348. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1498138. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
3
Health care experiences and perceptions among people with and without disabilities.残疾人和非残疾人的医疗保健经历及看法。
Disabil Health J. 2016 Jan;9(1):74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
4
Discrepancies in Demand of Internet of Things Services Among Older People and People With Disabilities, Their Caregivers, and Health Care Providers: Face-to-Face Survey Study.老年人、残疾人及其照顾者与医疗保健提供者对物联网服务需求的差异:面对面调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 15;22(4):e16614. doi: 10.2196/16614.
5
Accessibility information in New Delhi for "EaseAccess" Android-based app for persons with disability: an observational study.针对残疾人士的基于安卓系统的“轻松访问”应用程序在新德里的可访问性信息:一项观察性研究。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Oct;14(7):645-662. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1471743. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
6
Perceptions of the availability and effectiveness of HIV/AIDS awareness and intervention programmes by people with disabilities in Uganda.乌干达残疾人对艾滋病意识和干预计划的可及性和有效性的看法。
SAHARA J. 2010 Dec;7(4):17-23. doi: 10.1080/17290376.2010.9724973.
7
Closing the gap: training for healthcare workers and people with disabilities on the interrelationship of HIV and disability.缩小差距:针对医护人员和残疾人开展关于艾滋病毒与残疾相互关系的培训。
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(21):2012-21. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.991455. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
8
Accessibility and Web Quality Information for People with Disabilities in Healthcare Structures.医疗保健机构中残疾人的无障碍环境与网络质量信息
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020 Jun 26;272:306-309. doi: 10.3233/SHTI200556.
9
Web content accessibility of consumer health information web sites for people with disabilities: a cross sectional evaluation.面向残疾人的消费者健康信息网站的网络内容可及性:一项横断面评估
J Med Internet Res. 2004 Jun 21;6(2):e19. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6.2.e19.
10
Meeting information needs to facilitate decision making: report cards for people with disabilities.满足信息需求以促进决策:残疾人报告卡。
Health Expect. 2007 Sep;10(3):278-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00453.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk of COVID-19 and major adverse clinical outcomes among people with disabilities in South Korea.韩国残障人士感染 COVID-19 及主要不良临床结局的风险。
Disabil Health J. 2021 Oct;14(4):101127. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101127. Epub 2021 Jun 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients, health information, and guidelines: A focus-group study.患者、健康信息与指南:一项焦点小组研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2015;33(3):212-9. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2015.1067517. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
2
Use of quality information in decision-making about health and social care services--a systematic review.健康与社会护理服务决策中质量信息的使用——一项系统综述
Health Soc Care Community. 2015 Jul;23(4):349-61. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12133. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
3
The challenges of health professionals in meeting the needs of vulnerable patients undergoing chemotherapy: a focus group study.医疗专业人员在满足接受化疗的弱势患者需求方面面临的挑战:一项焦点小组研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Oct;23(19-20):2844-53. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12583. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
4
Preventing readmissions through comprehensive discharge planning.通过全面的出院计划预防再入院。
Prof Case Manag. 2013 Mar-Apr;18(2):56-63; quiz 64-5. doi: 10.1097/NCM.0b013e31827de1ce.
5
Changing choices: disabled and chronically ill people's experiences of reconsidering choices.改变选择:残疾人和慢性病患者重新考虑选择的经历。
Chronic Illn. 2013 Jun;9(2):116-32. doi: 10.1177/1742395312460410. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
6
Focus group interviews to examine the role and development of the clinical nurse specialist.焦点小组访谈以探讨临床护理专家的角色与发展。
J Nurs Manag. 2001 Nov;9(6):331-42.
7
Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups.定性研究。引入焦点小组。
BMJ. 1995 Jul 29;311(7000):299-302. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299.
8
Focus group interview: an underutilized research technique for improving theory and practice in health education.焦点小组访谈:一种在改善健康教育理论与实践方面未得到充分利用的研究技术。
Health Educ Q. 1987 Winter;14(4):411-48. doi: 10.1177/109019818701400404.
9
The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.分类数据观察者一致性的测量。
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74.