Brown Jamie, Michie Susan, Walmsley Matthew, West Robert
Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom;
Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom; National Centre for Smoking Cessation and Training, London, United Kingdom;
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 May;18(5):1093-100. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv161. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
Online motivational films to promote quit attempts could encourage large numbers of smokers to stop at low unit cost. We evaluated an online film documenting the experiences of smokers who recorded the first month of their successful attempts to quit (4Weeks2Freedom). The film was designed to boost motivation and self-efficacy and provide role-models to promote ex-smoker identities.
This was a randomized trial with individual assignment to a no-intervention control (n = 1016), an informational film (n = 1004), or 4Weeks2Freedom (n = 999). The development of 4Weeks2Freedom was informed by PRIME theory and focus-group testing with smokers. The 90-minute film was available online to view in one sitting or as chapters over 4 weeks to coincide with the progress of an attempt. The primary outcome was a quit attempt in the 4 weeks between assignment and study endpoint by intent-to-treat.
Participants smoked a mean of 13 cigarettes per day and 31% reported not wanting to stop. At follow-up, 55% reported viewing the informational control film and 56% viewing 4Weeks2Freedom. There was no detectable effect compared with the no-intervention control (OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.81 to 1.21, 24.3% vs. 24.5%) or informational control film (OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.80 to 1.21, 24.3% vs. 24.6%). Calculation of Bayes factors ruled out insensitive data and indicated the intervention was no more effective than either the no-intervention control (Bayes factor = 0.20) or informational control film (Bayes factor = 0.27). The pattern of results was unchanged in sensitivity analyses that examined the effect among only those who viewed the films.
The online documentary film (4Weeks2Freedom) designed to boost motivation and self-efficacy and to promote ex-smoker identity does not appear to prompt quit attempts among smokers.
This trial found that an online documentary film (4Weeks2Freedom) designed to boost motivation and self-efficacy and to promote ex-smoker identity was ineffective in prompting quit attempts among an unselected panel of smokers from the UK. This approach appears unpromising as a means of raising the rate at which smokers attempt to quit and is a low priority for future research.
用于促进戒烟尝试的在线激励影片能够以较低的单位成本鼓励大量吸烟者戒烟。我们评估了一部在线影片,该影片记录了成功戒烟首月的吸烟者的经历(《四周走向自由》)。这部影片旨在增强动力和自我效能感,并提供榜样以促进吸烟者转变为戒烟者的身份认同。
这是一项随机试验,将个体随机分配至无干预对照组(n = 1016)、信息影片组(n = 1004)或《四周走向自由》组(n = 999)。《四周走向自由》的制作参考了PRIME理论并经过了吸烟者焦点小组测试。这部90分钟的影片可在线一次性观看,也可分四周按章节观看,以配合戒烟尝试的进程。主要结局是在意向性分析中,从分配到研究终点的4周内进行的戒烟尝试。
参与者平均每天吸烟13支,31%的人表示不想戒烟。在随访时,55%的人报告观看了信息对照影片,56%的人观看了《四周走向自由》。与无干预对照组(比值比 = 0.99,95%置信区间 = 0.81至1.21,24.3%对24.5%)或信息对照影片组(比值比 = 0.99,95%置信区间 = 0.80至1.21,24.3%对24.6%)相比,未发现可检测到的效果。贝叶斯因子计算排除了不敏感数据,并表明该干预措施并不比无干预对照组(贝叶斯因子 = 0.20)或信息对照影片组(贝叶斯因子 = 0.27)更有效。在仅对观看影片者进行效果检验的敏感性分析中,结果模式未发生变化。
这部旨在增强动力和自我效能感并促进吸烟者转变为戒烟者身份认同的在线纪录片(《四周走向自由》)似乎并未促使吸烟者进行戒烟尝试。
该试验发现,这部旨在增强动力和自我效能感并促进吸烟者转变为戒烟者身份认同的在线纪录片(《四周走向自由》),对于促使来自英国的未经过筛选的吸烟者群体进行戒烟尝试并无效果。作为提高吸烟者尝试戒烟率的一种手段,这种方法似乎前景不佳,且是未来研究的低优先级课题。