Mboera Leonard E G, Ipuge Yahya, Kumalija Claud J, Rubona Josbert, Perera Sriyant, Masanja Honorati, Boerma Ties
National Institute for Medical Research, PO Box 9653, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania .
Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania .
Bull World Health Organ. 2015 Apr 1;93(4):271-8. doi: 10.2471/BLT.14.141069. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
In the health sector, planning and resource allocation at country level are mainly guided by national plans. For each such plan, a midterm review of progress is important for policy-makers since the review can inform the second half of the plan's implementation and provide a situation analysis on which the subsequent plan can be based. The review should include a comprehensive analysis using recent data - from surveys, facility and administrative databases - and global health estimates. Any midterm analysis of progress is best conducted by a team comprising representatives of government agencies, independent national institutions and global health organizations. Here we present an example of such a review, done in 2013 in the United Republic of Tanzania. Compared to similar countries, the results of this midterm review showed good progress in all health indicators except skilled birth attendance.
在卫生部门，国家层面的规划和资源分配主要以国家计划为指导。对于每一项此类计划，对进展情况进行中期审查对政策制定者而言至关重要，因为该审查可为计划实施的后半段提供信息，并提供后续计划可依据的形势分析。审查应包括使用来自调查、机构和行政数据库的最新数据以及全球卫生估计数进行的全面分析。对进展情况的任何中期分析最好由一个由政府机构、独立国家机构和全球卫生组织代表组成的团队进行。在此，我们展示了2013年在坦桑尼亚联合共和国进行的此类审查的一个例子。与类似国家相比，本次中期审查结果显示，除熟练接生率外，所有卫生指标均取得了良好进展。
