• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Contact Allergy in Danish Healthcare Workers: A Retrospective Matched Case-control Study.

作者信息

Schwensen Jakob F, Menné Torkil, Sommerlund Mette, Andersen Klaus E, Mortz Charlotte G, Zachariae Claus, Johansen Jeanne D

机构信息

National Allergy Research Centre, Department of Dermato-Allergology, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Derm Venereol. 2016 Feb;96(2):237-40. doi: 10.2340/00015555-2202.

DOI:10.2340/00015555-2202
PMID:26259136
Abstract

Contact dermatitis in healthcare workers is a world wide problem. We conducted a retrospective observational study of the patch-test results of 1402 healthcare workers and 1402 matched controls with contact dermatitis who were treated at 3 hospitals departments in Denmark between 2007 and 2014. The primary objective was to determine whether healthcare work was associated with contact allergy to thiuram mix. Unadjusted univariate analyses revealed that healthcare work was significantly associated with occupational contact dermatitis and hand dermatitis. Contact allergy to thiuram mix was more common in healthcare workers was significantly associated with having occupational contact dermatitis, hand dermatitis and older age. In conclusion, we report here a potential problem of contact allergy to thiurams in healthcare workers with contact dermatitis. Legislative authorities may in the future focus on the use of rubber accelerators in, for example, protective gloves, which are widely used by healthcare professionals.

摘要

相似文献

1
Contact Allergy in Danish Healthcare Workers: A Retrospective Matched Case-control Study.
Acta Derm Venereol. 2016 Feb;96(2):237-40. doi: 10.2340/00015555-2202.
2
Changing frequency of thiuram allergy in healthcare workers with hand dermatitis.手部皮炎医护人员中硫脲过敏的频率变化
Br J Dermatol. 2001 Feb;144(2):347-50. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04024.x.
3
Occupational skin disease among Australian healthcare workers: a retrospective analysis from an occupational dermatology clinic, 1993-2014.澳大利亚医护人员的职业性皮肤病:1993 - 2014年职业皮肤病诊所的回顾性分析
Contact Dermatitis. 2016 Oct;75(4):213-22. doi: 10.1111/cod.12616. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
4
Prevalence of delayed-type and immediate-type hypersensitivity in healthcare workers with hand eczema.手部湿疹医护人员中迟发型和速发型超敏反应的患病率。
Contact Dermatitis. 2016 Oct;75(4):223-9. doi: 10.1111/cod.12587. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
5
Occupational dermatitis in health care workers evaluated for suspected allergic contact dermatitis.医护人员疑似变应性接触性皮炎评估中的职业性皮炎。
Dermatitis. 2015 Jul-Aug;26(4):177-83. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000124.
6
Accelerator-free gloves as alternatives in cases of glove allergy in healthcare workers.无加速器手套可作为医护人员手套过敏情况下的替代品。
Contact Dermatitis. 2018 Jan;78(1):28-32. doi: 10.1111/cod.12860. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
7
Occupational Contact Dermatitis: Workers' Compensation Patch Test Results of Portland, Oregon, 2005-2014.职业性接触性皮炎:俄勒冈州波特兰市 2005-2014 年工人赔偿斑贴试验结果。
Dermatitis. 2015 Nov-Dec;26(6):276-83. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000142.
8
ESSCA results with the baseline series, 2009-2012: rubber allergens.2009 - 2012年基线系列的ESSCA结果:橡胶过敏原
Contact Dermatitis. 2015 Nov;73(5):305-12. doi: 10.1111/cod.12454. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
9
Etiology of hand dermatitis among patients referred for patch testing.因斑贴试验而转诊患者手部皮炎的病因
Dermatitis. 2004 Mar;15(1):25-32.
10
Hand eczema and occupational contact allergies in healthcare workers with a focus on rubber additives.手部湿疹和医护人员的职业性接触过敏,重点是橡胶添加剂。
Contact Dermatitis. 2018 Sep;79(3):149-156. doi: 10.1111/cod.13042. Epub 2018 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Thresholds for Contact Allergy to a Rubber Accelerator: TETD-Determined by Serial Dilution Patch Testing and a Simulated Glove-Use Model.橡胶促进剂接触性过敏的阈值:通过系列稀释斑贴试验和模拟手套使用模型确定的二硫化四乙基秋兰姆(TETD)
Contact Dermatitis. 2025 Aug;93(2):138-147. doi: 10.1111/cod.14817. Epub 2025 May 16.
2
Contents of sensitising rubber accelerators in disposable rubber gloves: A Copenhagen market survey.一次性橡胶手套中致敏性橡胶促进剂的含量:哥本哈根市场调查
Contact Dermatitis. 2025 Feb;92(2):131-136. doi: 10.1111/cod.14709. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
3
Cross-reactivity between thiuram disulfides and dithiocarbamates. A study of TETD and ZDEC using mouse models.
二硫化秋兰姆与二硫代氨基甲酸盐之间的交叉反应性。使用小鼠模型对双硫仑和代森锌的研究。
Contact Dermatitis. 2025 Feb;92(2):137-144. doi: 10.1111/cod.14706. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
4
Occupational Exposure of Employees in a Multispecialty Hospital to Factors Causing Contact Dermatitis-A Questionnaire Study.多专科医院员工接触性皮炎致病因素职业暴露情况的问卷调查研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Nov 27;59(12):2084. doi: 10.3390/medicina59122084.
5
The novel questionnaire assessing occupational exposure to the risk factors of contact allergy among health professionals.这份用于评估医疗专业人员职业接触接触性过敏风险因素的新型调查问卷。
Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2023 Apr;40(2):291-297. doi: 10.5114/ada.2023.127645. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
6
Artificial Intelligence That Predicts Sensitizing Potential of Cosmetic Ingredients with Accuracy Comparable to Animal and In Vitro Tests-How Does the Infotechnomics Compare to Other "Omics" in the Cosmetics Safety Assessment?人工智能预测化妆品成分致敏潜力的准确性可与动物和体外试验相媲美——Infotechnomics 与化妆品安全评估中的其他“组学”相比如何?
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Apr 6;24(7):6801. doi: 10.3390/ijms24076801.
7
Occupational Skin Dermatitis among Healthcare Workers Associated with the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review of the Literature.医护人员与 COVID-19 大流行相关的职业性皮肤性皮炎:文献综述。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Feb 3;24(3):2989. doi: 10.3390/ijms24032989.
8
Skin care and hygiene among healthcare professionals during and after the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.2019冠状病毒病大流行期间及之后医护人员的皮肤护理与卫生
SAGE Open Med. 2021 Dec 8;9:20503121211062795. doi: 10.1177/20503121211062795. eCollection 2021.
9
Contact Allergy: A Review of Current Problems from a Clinical Perspective.接触过敏:从临床角度看当前问题综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 29;15(6):1108. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061108.