Kneebone I I, Guerrier S, Dunmore E, Jones E, Fife-Schaw C
Graduate School of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia ; Virgin Care NHS, Haslemere, Surrey GU27 2BJ, UK.
Department of Social Psychology, London School of Economics, London WC2A 2AE, UK.
Behav Neurol. 2015;2015:190405. doi: 10.1155/2015/190405. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
Hopelessness theory predicts that negative attributional style will interact with negative life events over time to predict depression. The intention of this study was to test this in a population who are at greater risk of negative life events, people with Multiple Sclerosis (MS).
Data, including measures of attributional style, negative life events, and depressive symptoms, were collected via postal survey in 3 phases, each one a year apart.
Responses were received from over 380 participants at each study phase. Negative attributional style was consistently able to predict future depressive symptoms at low to moderate levels of association; however, this ability was not sustained when depressive symptoms at Phase 1 were controlled for. No substantial evidence to support the hypothesised interaction of negative attributional style and negative life events was found.
Findings were not supportive of the causal interaction proposed by the hopelessness theory of depression. Further work considering other time frames, using methods to prime attributional style before assessment and specifically assessing the hopelessness subtype of depression, may prove to be more fruitful. Intervention directly to address attributional style should also be considered.
绝望理论预测,随着时间的推移,消极归因方式将与消极生活事件相互作用,从而预测抑郁症。本研究的目的是在消极生活事件风险更高的人群——多发性硬化症(MS)患者中对此进行验证。
通过邮政调查分三个阶段收集数据,包括归因方式、消极生活事件和抑郁症状的测量指标,每个阶段相隔一年。
在每个研究阶段都收到了380多名参与者的回复。消极归因方式始终能够在低至中等关联水平上预测未来的抑郁症状;然而,在对第一阶段的抑郁症状进行控制后,这种预测能力并未持续。没有发现实质性证据支持消极归因方式与消极生活事件之间的假设性相互作用。
研究结果不支持抑郁绝望理论所提出的因果相互作用。考虑其他时间框架、在评估前使用方法启动归因方式并专门评估抑郁症的绝望亚型的进一步研究可能会更有成效。还应考虑直接针对归因方式的干预措施。