Scorza A, Conforto S, D'Anna C, Sciuto S A
Department of Engineering, ROMA TRE University, Via della Vasca Navale 62, Roma, Italy.
Open Biomed Eng J. 2015 Jul 31;9:164-78. doi: 10.2174/1874120701509010164. eCollection 2015.
To check or to prevent failures in ultrasound medical systems, some tests should be scheduled for both clinical suitability and technical functionality evaluation: among them, image quality assurance tests performed by technicians through ultrasound phantoms are widespread today and their results depend on issues related to scanner settings as well as phantom features and operator experience. In the present study variations on some features of the B-mode image were measured when the ultrasound probe is handled by the technician in a routine image quality test: ultrasound phantom images from two array transducers are processed to evaluate measurement dispersion in distance accuracy, high contrast spatial resolution and penetration depth when probe is handled by the operator. All measurements are done by means of an in-house image analysis software that minimizes errors due to operator's visual acuity and subjective judgment while influences of ultrasound transducer position on quality assurance test results are estimated as expanded uncertainties on parameters above (measurement reproducibility at 95 percent confidence level): depending on the probe model, they ranged from ±0.1 to ±1.9 mm in high contrast spatial resolution, from ±0.1 to ±5.5 percent in distance measurements error and from ±1 to ±10 mm in maximum depth of signal visualization. Although numerical results are limited to the two examined probes, they confirm some predictions based on general working principles of diagnostic ultrasound systems: (a) measurements strongly depend on settings as well on phantoms features, probes and parameters investigated; (b) relative uncertainty due to probe manipulation on spatial resolution can be very high, i.e. from 10 to more than 30 percent;
为了检查或预防超声医疗系统出现故障,应安排一些测试,以评估临床适用性和技术功能:其中,技术人员通过超声体模进行的图像质量保证测试如今已广泛应用,其结果取决于与扫描仪设置、体模特征以及操作人员经验相关的问题。在本研究中,当技术人员在常规图像质量测试中操作超声探头时,测量了B模式图像某些特征的变化:对来自两个阵列换能器的超声体模图像进行处理,以评估操作人员操作探头时在距离精度、高对比度空间分辨率和穿透深度方面的测量离散度。所有测量均通过内部图像分析软件进行,该软件可将由于操作人员视力和主观判断导致的误差降至最低,同时将超声换能器位置对质量保证测试结果的影响估计为上述参数的扩展不确定度(95%置信水平下的测量再现性):根据探头型号,高对比度空间分辨率的不确定度范围为±0.1至±1.9毫米,距离测量误差的不确定度范围为±0.1至±5.5%,信号可视化最大深度的不确定度范围为±1至±10毫米。尽管数值结果仅限于所检查的两个探头,但它们证实了基于诊断超声系统一般工作原理的一些预测:(a)测量结果强烈依赖于设置以及所研究的体模特征、探头和参数;(b)由于探头操作导致的空间分辨率相对不确定度可能非常高,即从10%到超过30%;