Courtin Emilie, Knapp Martin, Grundy Emily, Avendano-Pabon Mauricio
London School of Economics and Political Science, Social Policy, London, UK.
Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2015 Dec;24(4):287-304. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1489. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
The Centre for Epidemiologic Studies of Depression (CES-D) and the Euro-D are commonly used depressive symptom scales but their comparability has not been assessed to date. This article aims to contribute to the literature comparing the drivers of depression in old age across countries by examining whether CES-D (in its eight-item short version) and Euro-D are comparable. Data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE, N = 15,487) covering 13 countries was used to examine the scales' distributional properties, systematic differences between population subgroups, sensitivity and specificity, and associations with established risk factors for depression in old age. CES-D and Euro-D were strongly correlated (r = 0.6819, p < 0.000). However, agreement between the two scales was moderate. There were systematic discrepancies in scores by demographic characteristics. CES-D captures a more extreme pool of depressed individuals than Euro-D. Although associations with risk factors are always in the same direction, they are often stronger for CES-D than Euro-D. Findings highlight the need to be cautious when comparing depression levels and associations with risk factors between surveys using different measures of depressive symptoms. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)和欧洲抑郁量表(Euro-D)是常用的抑郁症状量表,但它们的可比性至今尚未得到评估。本文旨在通过研究CES-D(八项简短版本)和Euro-D是否具有可比性,为比较不同国家老年抑郁症驱动因素的文献做出贡献。来自欧洲健康、老龄化与退休调查(SHARE,N = 15487)涵盖13个国家的数据用于检验量表的分布特性、人群亚组之间的系统差异、敏感性和特异性,以及与老年抑郁症既定风险因素的关联。CES-D和Euro-D高度相关(r = 0.6819,p < 0.000)。然而,两个量表之间的一致性为中等。按人口统计学特征得分存在系统差异。与Euro-D相比,CES-D涵盖了更极端的抑郁个体群体。虽然与风险因素的关联始终方向相同,但CES-D通常比Euro-D更强。研究结果强调,在使用不同抑郁症状测量方法的调查之间比较抑郁水平和与风险因素的关联时,需要谨慎。版权所有© 2015约翰威立父子有限公司。