Van Eenoo Liza, Declercq Anja, Onder Graziano, Finne-Soveri Harriet, Garms-Homolová Vjenka, Jónsson Pálmi V, Dix Olivia H M, Smit Johannes H, van Hout Hein P J, van der Roest Henriëtte G
1 LUCAS, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
1 LUCAS, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Eur J Public Health. 2016 Apr;26(2):213-9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv152. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
The European population is aging. The main drivers of public spending on health care for people of 65 years and older are hospital admission and admission to long-term care facilities. High quality community care can be a cost-effective and quality solution to respond to the impact of ageing populations on health-care systems. It is unclear how well countries are equipped to provide affordable and quality community care. The aim of this article is to describe and compare community care delivery with care-dependent older people in Europe.
This study is conducted within the European Union-financed IBenC project [Identifying best practices for care-dependent elderly byBenchmarkingCosts and outcomes of community care (FP7)] in which six European countries are involved. To compare the community care delivery with care-dependent older people in these countries, we performed a systematic comparison of macro indicators using metadata complemented with data from multinational surveys.
Data on the following dimensions are described and compared: population of the country, governmental expenditures on health, sources of community health services funding, governmental vision and regulation on community care, community care organisations and care professionals, eligibility criteria for and equity in receiving care and the involvement of informal care.
: Because of the variations in the European community care contexts, the growing demand for community care as a cost-effective and quality solution to the care burden of aging populations will have country-specific impacts. When learning from other countries' best practices, in addition to researchers, policy makers should take full account of local and national care contexts.
欧洲人口正在老龄化。65岁及以上人群医疗保健公共支出的主要驱动因素是住院和入住长期护理机构。高质量的社区护理可能是应对老龄化人口对医疗保健系统影响的一种具有成本效益且优质的解决方案。目前尚不清楚各国在提供负担得起且优质的社区护理方面准备得如何。本文旨在描述和比较欧洲为需要护理的老年人提供社区护理的情况。
本研究是在欧盟资助的IBenC项目[通过社区护理成本和结果基准确定依赖护理老年人的最佳实践(FP7)]中进行的,该项目涉及六个欧洲国家。为了比较这些国家为需要护理的老年人提供社区护理的情况,我们使用元数据并辅以跨国调查数据对宏观指标进行了系统比较。
对以下几个方面的数据进行了描述和比较:国家人口、政府卫生支出、社区卫生服务资金来源、政府对社区护理的愿景和监管、社区护理组织和护理专业人员、接受护理的资格标准和公平性以及非正式护理的参与情况。
由于欧洲社区护理环境存在差异,作为应对老龄化人口护理负担的一种具有成本效益且优质的解决方案,对社区护理需求的不断增长将产生因国家而异的影响。在借鉴其他国家的最佳实践时,除了研究人员外,政策制定者还应充分考虑当地和国家的护理环境。