• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发初级保健患者安全事件分类系统。LINNEAUS初级保健患者安全合作项目的文献综述与德尔菲调查。

Developing a patient safety incident classification system for primary care. A literature review and Delphi-survey by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care.

作者信息

Klemp Kerstin, Dovey Susan, Valderas Jose M, Rohe Julia, Godycki-Cwirko Maciek, Elliott Phillip, Beyer Martin, Gerlach Ferdin M, Hoffmann Barbara

机构信息

a Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Institute of General Practice , Frankfurt am Main , Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Gen Pract. 2015 Sep;21 Suppl(sup1):35-8. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2015.1043723.

DOI:10.3109/13814788.2015.1043723
PMID:26339834
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4828622/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite awareness that comparative analysis of patient safety data from several data sources would promote risk reduction, there has been little effort to establish an incident classification system that is generally applicable to patient safety data in European primary care.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the development of a patient safety incident classification system for primary care.

METHODS

A systematic review was followed by an expert group discussion and a modified Delphi survey, to provide consensus statements.

RESULTS

We developed a classification system providing a mechanism for classifying patient safety incidents across Europe, taking into account the varying organizational arrangements that exist for primary care. It takes into account organizational processes and outcomes related to patient safety incidents and can supplement existing classification systems.

CONCLUSION

Classification systems are key tools in the analysis of patient safety incidents. A system that has relevance for primary care is now available.

摘要

背景

尽管人们意识到对来自多个数据源的患者安全数据进行比较分析将有助于降低风险,但在欧洲初级保健中,几乎没有努力建立一个普遍适用于患者安全数据的事件分类系统。

目的

描述一种用于初级保健的患者安全事件分类系统的开发过程。

方法

先进行系统综述,然后进行专家组讨论和改良的德尔菲调查,以提供共识声明。

结果

我们开发了一个分类系统,该系统考虑到初级保健中存在的不同组织安排,为全欧洲的患者安全事件分类提供了一种机制。它考虑了与患者安全事件相关的组织流程和结果,并且可以补充现有的分类系统。

结论

分类系统是分析患者安全事件的关键工具。现在已有一个适用于初级保健的系统。

相似文献

1
Developing a patient safety incident classification system for primary care. A literature review and Delphi-survey by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care.开发初级保健患者安全事件分类系统。LINNEAUS初级保健患者安全合作项目的文献综述与德尔菲调查。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2015 Sep;21 Suppl(sup1):35-8. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2015.1043723.
2
A safety incident reporting system for primary care. A systematic literature review and consensus procedure by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care.基层医疗安全事件报告系统。LINNEAUS基层医疗患者安全协作组的系统文献综述与共识程序。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2015 Sep;21 Suppl(sup1):39-44. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2015.1043728.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Patient-Reported Incident Measure (PRIM) tools for reporting patient safety incidents: protocol for a scoping review.用于报告患者安全事件的患者报告事件测量(PRIM)工具:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 23;15(6):e096983. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096983.
6
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
7
Development of a classification system for potential sources of error in robotic-assisted spine surgery.机器人辅助脊柱手术潜在误差源分类系统的开发。
Spine Deform. 2025 Apr 1. doi: 10.1007/s43390-025-01066-3.
8
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome全身炎症反应综合征
9
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
10
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of Patient Safety Incidents in Primary Care Reported in an Electronic Registry Application.基层医疗电子报告系统中上报的患者安全事件分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 25;18(17):8941. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18178941.
2
Capturing Patients' Perspectives on Medication Safety: The Development of a Patient-Centered Medication Safety Framework.捕捉患者对药物安全的看法:以患者为中心的药物安全框架的制定。
J Patient Saf. 2020 Dec;16(4):e324-e339. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000583.
3
Classification of patient-safety incidents in primary care.初级保健中的患者安全事件分类。
Bull World Health Organ. 2018 Jul 1;96(7):498-505. doi: 10.2471/BLT.17.199802. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
4
Measuring patient safety culture in maternal and child health institutions in China: a qualitative study.中国妇幼保健机构患者安全文化测评:一项质性研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 12;7(7):e015458. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015458.
5
Patient-reported safety incidents in older patients with long-term conditions: a large cross-sectional study.老年慢性病患者自我报告的安全事件:一项大型横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 May 30;7(5):e013524. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013524.
6
Patient safety research in primary care: where are we now?初级保健中的患者安全研究:我们目前的状况如何?
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Dec;65(641):622-3. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X687709.
7
A research agenda on patient safety in primary care. Recommendations by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care.一份关于基层医疗中患者安全的研究议程。LINNEAUS基层医疗患者安全合作组织的建议。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2015 Sep;21 Suppl(sup1):72-7. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2015.1043726.
8
First experiences with patient safety initiatives in Greek rural primary care. Action research by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care.希腊农村初级保健中患者安全举措的首次经验。LINNEAUS初级保健患者安全合作项目的行动研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2015 Sep;21 Suppl(sup1):69-71. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2015.1043731.
9
Patient safety and the control of time in primary care: A review of the French tempos framework by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care.基层医疗中的患者安全与时间控制:基层医疗患者安全LINNEAUS合作组织对法国节奏框架的综述
Eur J Gen Pract. 2015 Sep;21 Suppl(sup1):45-9. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2015.1043733.
10
A safety incident reporting system for primary care. A systematic literature review and consensus procedure by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care.基层医疗安全事件报告系统。LINNEAUS基层医疗患者安全协作组的系统文献综述与共识程序。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2015 Sep;21 Suppl(sup1):39-44. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2015.1043728.

本文引用的文献

1
The nature and causes of unintended events reported at ten emergency departments.报告的十家急诊科意外事件的性质和原因。
BMC Emerg Med. 2009 Sep 18;9:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-9-16.
2
An international language for patient safety: Global progress in patient safety requires classification of key concepts.患者安全的国际语言:全球患者安全进展需要对关键概念进行分类。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2009 Feb;21(1):1. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzn056.
3
The "To Err is Human" report and the patient safety literature.《人皆有过》报告与患者安全文献
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Jun;15(3):174-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.017947.