Assil Kerry K, Harris Lindsay, Cecka Jeannie
Assil Eye Institute, Beverly Hills, CA, USA.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug 3;9:1405-11. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S86660. eCollection 2015.
To compare surgical efficiency and multiple early clinical outcome variables in eyes undergoing phacoemulsification using either transversal or torsional ultrasound systems.
Assil Eye Institute, Beverly Hills, CA, USA.
Prospective, randomized, clinician-masked, contralaterally controlled single-center evaluation.
Patients seeking cataract removal in both eyes with implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses were randomly assigned to one of two treatment rooms for phacoemulsification with either a transverse ultrasound system or torsional handpiece system. The contralateral eye was treated at a later date with the alternate device. A total of 54 eyes of 27 patients having similar degrees of cataract, astigmatism, and visual potential were included. All operative data were collected for analysis, and patients were followed for 3 months after surgery.
Similar visual acuity was reported at all postoperative visits between the two groups. Mean phacoemulsification time and total power required were both significantly lower with the transverse system than with the torsional technique (P<0.05 for both). Similarly, mean total balanced salt solution used was significantly less with the transverse system vs torsional (P<0.05). Postoperative safety demonstrated significantly lower endothelial cell loss at 1 day and 1 month (P<0.05) with transverse vs torsional. Macular swelling was less at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months with transverse vs torsional, although the difference did not achieve significance (P=0.1) at any single time point. Clinically detectable corneal edema was reported less frequently at all postoperative time points with the transverse system.
The transverse ultrasound system was found to be possibly associated with less balanced salt-solution use, less phacoemulsification time, and less power required than the torsional phaco system. Postoperative data suggested that improved phaco efficiency may translate to a better overall safety profile for the patient.
比较使用横向或扭转超声系统进行白内障超声乳化手术的手术效率及多个早期临床结局变量。
美国加利福尼亚州比佛利山庄阿西尔眼科研究所。
前瞻性、随机、临床医生设盲、对侧对照单中心评估。
双眼寻求白内障摘除并植入多焦点人工晶状体的患者被随机分配至两个治疗室之一,分别使用横向超声系统或扭转超声乳化手柄系统进行超声乳化手术。对侧眼在之后使用另一种设备进行治疗。纳入了27例白内障、散光和视觉潜能程度相似的患者的54只眼。收集所有手术数据进行分析,术后对患者随访3个月。
两组术后各次随访时的视力相似。横向系统的平均超声乳化时间和所需总能量均显著低于扭转技术(两者均P<0.05)。同样,横向系统使用的平均总平衡盐溶液量显著少于扭转技术(P<0.05)。术后安全性方面,横向组术后1天和1个月的内皮细胞损失显著低于扭转组(P<0.05)。横向组在术后1周、1个月和3个月时黄斑水肿较扭转组轻,尽管在任何单个时间点差异均未达到显著水平(P = 0.1)。横向系统在所有术后时间点报告的临床可检测角膜水肿发生率较低。
发现横向超声系统与扭转超声乳化系统相比,可能使用的平衡盐溶液更少、超声乳化时间更短且所需能量更少。术后数据表明,提高超声乳化效率可能为患者带来更好的整体安全性。