• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

规模很重要:马拉维一项移动健康干预措施的成本效益分析。

Scale Matters: A Cost-Outcome Analysis of an m-Health Intervention in Malawi.

作者信息

Larsen-Cooper Erin, Bancroft Emily, Rajagopal Sharanya, O'Toole Maggie, Levin Ann

机构信息

1 Health Systems Group, VillageReach , Seattle, Washington.

2 Department of Health Services, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

Telemed J E Health. 2016 Apr;22(4):317-24. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2015.0060. Epub 2015 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1089/tmj.2015.0060
PMID:26348994
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4817568/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The primary objectives of this study are to determine cost per user and cost per contact with users of a mobile health (m-health) intervention. The secondary objectives are to map costs to changes in maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH) and to estimate costs of alternate implementation and usage scenarios.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A base cost model, constructed from recurrent costs and selected capital costs, was used to estimate average cost per user and per contact of an m-health intervention. This model was mapped to statistically significant changes in MNCH intermediate outcomes to determine the cost of improvements in MNCH indicators. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to estimate costs in alternate scenarios.

RESULTS

The m-health intervention cost $29.33 per user and $4.33 per successful contact. The average cost for each user experiencing a change in an MNCH indicator ranged from $67 to $355. The sensitivity analyses showed that cost per user could be reduced by 48% if the service were to operate at full capacity.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that the intervention, operating at scale, has potential to be a cost-effective method for improving maternal and child health indicators.

摘要

背景

本研究的主要目标是确定移动健康(m-健康)干预措施的每位用户成本以及与用户每次接触的成本。次要目标是将成本与孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康(MNCH)的变化相对应,并估算替代实施和使用场景的成本。

材料与方法

使用一个由经常性成本和选定资本成本构建的基础成本模型,来估算m-健康干预措施的每位用户平均成本和每次接触平均成本。该模型与MNCH中间结果的统计学显著变化相对应,以确定MNCH指标改善的成本。进行敏感性分析以估算替代场景下的成本。

结果

m-健康干预措施每位用户成本为29.33美元,每次成功接触成本为4.33美元。经历MNCH指标变化的每位用户的平均成本在67美元至355美元之间。敏感性分析表明,如果该服务满负荷运行,每位用户成本可降低48%。

结论

我们认为,大规模实施的该干预措施有可能成为改善母婴健康指标的一种具有成本效益的方法。

相似文献

1
Scale Matters: A Cost-Outcome Analysis of an m-Health Intervention in Malawi.规模很重要:马拉维一项移动健康干预措施的成本效益分析。
Telemed J E Health. 2016 Apr;22(4):317-24. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2015.0060. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
2
Changing times? Gender roles and relationships in maternal, newborn and child health in Malawi.时代在变?马拉维母婴和儿童健康中的性别角色和关系。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Sep 25;17(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1523-1.
3
Mobile Technology for Community Health in Ghana: Is Maternal Messaging and Provider Use of Technology Cost-Effective in Improving Maternal and Child Health Outcomes at Scale?加纳社区卫生的移动技术:孕产妇信息传递及医疗服务提供者对技术的使用在大规模改善孕产妇和儿童健康结果方面是否具有成本效益?
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 13;21(2):e11268. doi: 10.2196/11268.
4
Finding the gap: revealing local disparities in coverage of maternal, newborn and child health services in South Sudan using lot quality assurance sampling.找出差距:利用批量质量保证抽样揭示南苏丹孕产妇、新生儿和儿童保健服务覆盖方面的地区差异。
Trop Med Int Health. 2015 Dec;20(12):1711-21. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12613. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
5
Cost and impact of scaling up interventions to save lives of mothers and children: taking South Africa closer to MDGs 4 and 5.扩大干预措施以拯救孕产妇和儿童生命的成本与影响:使南非更接近千年发展目标4和5
Glob Health Action. 2015 Apr 21;8:27265. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.27265. eCollection 2015.
6
Sustainable Cost Models for mHealth at Scale: Modeling Program Data from m4RH Tanzania.大规模移动健康的可持续成本模型:对坦桑尼亚m4RH项目数据进行建模
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 29;11(1):e0148011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148011. eCollection 2016.
7
Cost analysis of implementing mHealth intervention for maternal, newborn & child health care through community health workers: assessment of ReMIND program in Uttar Pradesh, India.利用社区卫生工作者实施移动医疗干预母婴和儿童保健的成本分析:印度北方邦 ReMIND 项目评估。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Oct 3;18(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2019-3.
8
Cost savings through implementation of an integrated home-based record: a case study in Vietnam.通过实施综合家庭记录实现成本节约:越南的一个案例研究。
Public Health. 2018 Mar;156:124-131. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.12.018. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
9
Determining the potential scalability of transport interventions for improving maternal, child, and newborn health in Pakistan.确定在巴基斯坦改善孕产妇、儿童和新生儿健康的运输干预措施的潜在可扩展性。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Nov 25;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0044-5.
10
The Demand and Supply Side Determinants of Access to Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Services in Malawi.马拉维母婴和儿童健康服务可及性的供需方决定因素
Matern Child Health J. 2019 Nov;23(11):1556-1563. doi: 10.1007/s10995-019-02791-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Appraising eHealth Investment for Africa: Scoping Review and Development of a Framework.评估非洲的电子健康投资:范围综述和框架制定。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Sep 25;21(10):1277. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21101277.
2
Availability of published evidence on coverage, cost components, and funding support for digitalisation of infectious disease surveillance in Africa, 2003-2022: a systematic review.2003-2022 年非洲传染病监测数字化的覆盖范围、成本构成和资金支持的已发表证据的可用性:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 28;24(1):1731. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19205-2.
3
The effect of mHealth on childhood vaccination in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.移动医疗对非洲儿童疫苗接种的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 21;19(2):e0294442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294442. eCollection 2024.
4
Development and evaluation of a culturally adapted digital-platform integrated multifaceted intervention to promote the utilization of maternal healthcare services: a single-arm pilot study.开发和评估一种文化适应的数字平台集成多方面干预措施,以促进孕产妇医疗保健服务的利用:一项单臂试点研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Oct 17;22(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-02033-y.
5
A cost analysis of implementing mobile health facilitated tuberculosis contact investigation in a low-income setting.在低收入环境中实施移动医疗促进肺结核接触者调查的成本分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 1;17(4):e0265033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265033. eCollection 2022.
6
EHealth Investment Appraisal in Africa: A Scoping Review.电子健康投资评估在非洲:范围综述。
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211059999. doi: 10.1177/00469580211059999.
7
Using Information and Communication Technologies to Engage Citizens in Health System Governance in Burkina Faso: Protocol for Action Research.利用信息通信技术促使布基纳法索公民参与卫生系统治理:行动研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Nov 16;10(11):e28780. doi: 10.2196/28780.
8
Appropriation of mHealth Interventions for Maternal Health Care in Sub-Saharan Africa: Hermeneutic Review.将移动医疗干预措施用于撒哈拉以南非洲的孕产妇保健:诠释学评论。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Oct 6;9(10):e22653. doi: 10.2196/22653.
9
Establishment of a cardiac telehealth program to support cardiovascular diagnosis and care in a remote, resource-poor setting in Uganda.在乌干达偏远且资源匮乏的地区建立心脏远程医疗项目,以支持心血管疾病的诊断和治疗。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 6;16(8):e0255918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255918. eCollection 2021.
10
An Interactive Text Messaging Intervention to Improve Adherence to Option B+ Prevention of Mother-to-Child HIV Transmission in Kenya: Cost Analysis.交互式短信干预措施以提高肯尼亚母婴 HIV 传播预防选择 B+的依从性:成本分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Oct 2;8(10):e18351. doi: 10.2196/18351.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review on what works, what does not work and why of implementation of mobile health (mHealth) projects in Africa.关于非洲移动健康(mHealth)项目实施中哪些有效、哪些无效以及原因的系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Feb 21;14:188. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-188.
2
Pilot evaluation of the text4baby mobile health program.文本 4 婴儿移动健康计划的初步评估。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Nov 26;12:1031. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1031.
3
Applying a framework for assessing the health system challenges to scaling up mHealth in South Africa.应用评估卫生系统挑战框架以推动南非移动医疗的发展。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Nov 5;12:123. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-123.
4
Cost analyses of peer health worker and mHealth support interventions for improving AIDS care in Rakai, Uganda.乌干达拉凯地区为改善艾滋病护理而开展的同伴健康工作者和移动健康支持干预措施的成本分析。
AIDS Care. 2013;25(5):652-6. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2012.722600. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
5
Mobile phones as a health communication tool to improve skilled attendance at delivery in Zanzibar: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.手机作为一种健康沟通工具,提高桑给巴尔熟练接生率:一项整群随机对照试验。
BJOG. 2012 Sep;119(10):1256-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03413.x. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
6
The economics of eHealth and mHealth.电子健康和移动健康的经济学。
J Health Commun. 2012;17 Suppl 1:73-81. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2011.649158.
7
Special delivery: an analysis of mHealth in maternal and newborn health programs and their outcomes around the world.特殊传递:全球母婴健康项目中移动医疗的分析及其结果。
Matern Child Health J. 2012 Jul;16(5):1092-101. doi: 10.1007/s10995-011-0836-3.
8
Application of smart phone in "Better Border Healthcare Program": a module for mother and child care.智能手机在“边境医疗改善计划”中的应用:母婴保健模块。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010 Nov 3;10:69. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-69.
9
Economic evaluation of health interventions.卫生干预措施的经济评估。
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1204. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1204.