Suppr超能文献

用于区分帕金森病不同认知亚型的剑桥认知功能检查表及各领域单项分界分数

Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination and Individual Domain Cut-Off Scores for Discriminating between Different Cognitive Subtypes of Parkinson's Disease.

作者信息

Berankova Dagmar, Janousova Eva, Mrackova Martina, Eliasova Ilona, Kostalova Milena, Skutilova Svetlana, Rektorova Irena

机构信息

Applied Neuroscience Research Group, CEITEC MU, Masaryk University, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic ; Department of Neurology, University Hospital in Ostrava, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic ; Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic.

Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Parkinsons Dis. 2015;2015:579417. doi: 10.1155/2015/579417. Epub 2015 Aug 17.

Abstract

Objective. The main aim of this study was to verify the sensitivity and specificity of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R) in discriminating between Parkinson's disease (PD) with normal cognition (PD-NC) and PD with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI) and between PD-MCI and PD with dementia (PD-D). We also evaluated how ACE-R correlates with neuropsychological cognitive tests in PD. Methods. We examined three age-matched groups of PD patients diagnosed according to the Movement Disorder Society Task Force criteria: PD-NC, PD-MCI, and PD-D. ROC analysis was used to establish specific cut-off scores of ACE-R and its domains. Correlation analyses were performed between ACE-R and its subtests with relevant neuropsychological tests. Results. Statistically significant differences between groups were demonstrated in global ACE-R scores and subscores, except in the language domain. ACE-R cut-off score of 88.5 points discriminated best between PD-MCI and PD-NC (sensitivity 0.68, specificity 0.91); ACE-R of 82.5 points distinguished best between PD-MCI and PD-D (sensitivity 0.70, specificity 0.73). The verbal fluency domain of ACE-R demonstrated the best discrimination between PD-NC and PD-MCI (cut-off score 11.5; sensitivity 0.70, specificity 0.73) while the orientation/attention subscore was best between PD-MCI and PD-D (cut-off score 15.5; sensitivity 0.90, specificity 0.97). ACE-R scores except for ACE-R language correlated with specific cognitive tests of interest.

摘要

目的。本研究的主要目的是验证修订版的Addenbrooke认知检查(ACE-R)在区分认知正常的帕金森病(PD-NC)和轻度认知障碍的帕金森病(PD-MCI)以及PD-MCI和痴呆型帕金森病(PD-D)方面的敏感性和特异性。我们还评估了ACE-R与帕金森病神经心理学认知测试之间的相关性。方法。我们检查了根据运动障碍协会特别工作组标准诊断的三组年龄匹配的帕金森病患者:PD-NC、PD-MCI和PD-D。采用ROC分析来确定ACE-R及其各领域的特定临界分数。对ACE-R及其子测试与相关神经心理学测试进行相关性分析。结果。除语言领域外,各组之间在ACE-R总分及各分项得分上均显示出统计学上的显著差异。ACE-R临界分数88.5分在区分PD-MCI和PD-NC方面表现最佳(敏感性0.68,特异性0.91);ACE-R分数82.5分在区分PD-MCI和PD-D方面表现最佳(敏感性0.70,特异性0.73)。ACE-R的语言流畅性领域在区分PD-NC和PD-MCI方面表现最佳(临界分数11.5;敏感性0.70,特异性0.73),而定向/注意力分项得分在区分PD-MCI和PD-D方面表现最佳(临界分数15.5;敏感性0.90,特异性0.97)。除ACE-R语言部分外,ACE-R分数与特定的相关认知测试相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验