Berezina-Greene Maria A, Guinan John J
Eaton-Peabody Lab, Mass. Eye and Ear Infirmary, 243 Charles St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Harvard-MIT HST Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology Program, Cambridge, MA, USA.
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2015 Dec;16(6):679-94. doi: 10.1007/s10162-015-0543-7. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
According to coherent reflection theory (CRT), stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) arise from cochlear irregularities coherently reflecting energy from basilar membrane motion within the traveling-wave peak. This reflected energy arrives in the ear canal predominantly with a single delay at each frequency. However, data from humans and animals indicate that (1) SFOAEs can have multiple delay components, (2) low-frequency SFOAE delays are too short to be accounted for by CRT, and (3) "SFOAEs" obtained with a 2nd ("suppressor") tone ≥2 octaves above the probe tone have been interpreted as arising from the area basal to the region of cochlear amplification. To explore these issues, we collected SFOAEs by the suppression method in guinea pigs and time-frequency analyzed these data, simulated SFOAEs, and published chinchilla SFOAEs. Time-frequency analysis revealed that most frequencies showed only one SFOAE delay component while other frequencies had multiple components including some with short delays. We found no systematic patterns in the occurrence of multiple delay components. Using a cochlear model that had significant basilar membrane motion only in the peak region of the traveling wave, simulated SFOAEs had single and multiple delay components similar to the animal SFOAEs. This result indicates that multiple components (including ones with short delays) can originate from cochlear mechanical irregularities in the SFOAE peak region and are not necessarily indicative of SFOAE sources in regions ≥2 octaves basal of the SFOAE peak region. We conclude that SFOAEs obtained with suppressors close to the probe frequency provide information primarily about the mechanical response in the region that receives amplification, and we attribute the too-short SFOAE delays at low frequencies to distortion-source SFOAEs and coherent reflection from multiple cochlear motions. Our findings suggest that CRT needs revision to include reflections from multiple motions in the cochlear apex.
根据相干反射理论(CRT),刺激频率耳声发射(SFOAE)源于耳蜗不规则性,其相干地反射来自行波峰值内基底膜运动的能量。这种反射能量在每个频率主要以单一延迟到达耳道。然而,来自人类和动物的数据表明:(1)SFOAE可以有多个延迟成分;(2)低频SFOAE延迟太短,无法用CRT解释;(3)在探测音上方≥2个八度的第二(“抑制”)音获得的“ SFOAE”被解释为源于耳蜗放大区域基底的区域。为了探讨这些问题,我们通过抑制方法在豚鼠中收集了SFOAE,并对这些数据进行了时频分析,模拟了SFOAE,并发表了灰鼠的SFOAE。时频分析表明,大多数频率仅显示一个SFOAE延迟成分,而其他频率具有多个成分,包括一些延迟短的成分。我们没有发现多个延迟成分出现的系统模式。使用仅在行波峰值区域具有明显基底膜运动的耳蜗模型,模拟的SFOAE具有与动物SFOAE相似的单一和多个延迟成分。该结果表明,多个成分(包括延迟短的成分)可源自SFOAE峰值区域的耳蜗机械不规则性,不一定指示SFOAE峰值区域≥2个八度基底区域中的SFOAE源。我们得出结论,使用接近探测频率的抑制器获得的SFOAE主要提供有关接受放大区域机械反应的信息,并且我们将低频下过短的SFOAE延迟归因于失真源SFOAE和来自多个耳蜗运动的相干反射。我们的研究结果表明,CRT需要修订,以包括耳蜗顶端多个运动的反射。