Shao Shan, Li Bin, Xue Hui-Min, Huang Hai-Yun, Liu Gang-Li
Department of Stomatology, The Third People's Hospital of Jinan No. 1 North Industrial Road, Wangsheren North Street, Jinan 250132, Shandong, China.
School of Stomatology Shandong University & Stomatological Hospital of Shandong University Jinan 250012, Shandong, China.
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Jul 15;8(7):10773-8. eCollection 2015.
To evaluate the effects of alveolar ridge preservation with Bio-Oss bone substitute (Geistlich Pharma) on delayed implant osseointegration. The 3rd and 4th left and right mandibular premolars were extracted from four adult healthy male and female dogs. For the experimental group, we randomly selected two extraction sockets in each dog to be filled with Bio-Oss bone substitute (Geistlich Pharma). The two remaining extraction sockets remained untreated and served as the control group. Three months after Bio-Oss placement, dental implants were inserted into the alveolar bone of the experimental group and the control group. The osteogenic activity of the bone around the implants was assessed by evaluating the histological morphology and by estimating histomorphometric parameters at 3 and 6 months after delayed implantation. At 3 months, Goldner's trichrome staining analysis showed that the bone-implant contact rate and mineralised bone area around the implant were significantly higher in the experimental group (75.98% ± 8.97% and 69.52% ± 9.63%, respectively) than in the control group (56.13% ± 8.18% and 52.82% ± 7.25%, respectively; P < 0.05). However, at 6 months, the two groups showed no significant difference. Fluorescence microscopy analysis revealed that the average mineralisation apposition rate of the bone tissue around the dental implant in the experimental group at 3 and 6 months was 6.80 ± 0.43 μm and 8.38 ± 0.84 μm, respectively, which was significantly higher than the rate in the control group (P < 0.05). These data indicated that alveolar ridge preservation by using Bio-Oss placement can promote osseointegration of delayed implantation. This may be a promising option for clinical use.
评估使用Bio-Oss骨替代材料(盖氏制药)进行牙槽嵴保存对延期种植体骨结合的影响。从四只成年健康雄性和雌性犬的下颌左右第三和第四前磨牙拔除。对于实验组,我们在每只犬中随机选择两个拔牙窝,用Bio-Oss骨替代材料(盖氏制药)填充。其余两个拔牙窝不做处理作为对照组。Bio-Oss植入三个月后,将牙种植体植入实验组和对照组的牙槽骨。通过评估组织学形态和在延期植入后3个月和6个月估计组织形态计量学参数来评估种植体周围骨的成骨活性。在3个月时,戈德纳三色染色分析显示,实验组种植体周围的骨-种植体接触率和矿化骨面积(分别为75.98%±8.97%和69.52%±9.63%)显著高于对照组(分别为56.13%±8.18%和52.82%±7.25%;P<0.05)。然而,在6个月时,两组无显著差异。荧光显微镜分析显示,实验组牙种植体周围骨组织在3个月和6个月时的平均矿化沉积率分别为6.80±0.43μm和8.38±0.84μm,显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。这些数据表明,使用Bio-Oss植入进行牙槽嵴保存可促进延期种植的骨结合。这可能是一种有前景的临床应用选择。