Wang Li, Zou Zhi-Qiang, Wang Kai, Yu Ji-Guang, Liu Xiang-Zhong
Infectious Disease Hospital of Yantai, 62 Huanshan Road, Zhifu District, Yantai, 264001, Shandong, China.
Hepatology Department, Qilu Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Hepatol Int. 2016 Jan;10(1):133-8. doi: 10.1007/s12072-015-9657-6. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
The purpose of this study was to characterize roles of serum hepatitis B virus marker quantitation in differentiation of natural phases of HBV infection.
A total of 184 chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were classified into four categories: immune tolerant phase (IT, n = 36), immune clearance phase (IC, n = 81), low-replicative phase (LR, n = 31), and HBeAg-negative hepatitis phase (ENH, n = 36), based on clinical, biochemical, serological, HBV DNA level and histological data.
Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) quantitation in four phases were 4.7 ± 0.2, 3.8 ± 0.5, 2.5 ± 1.2 and 3.4 ± 0.4 log10 IU/mL, respectively. There were significant differences between IT and IC (p < 0.001) and between LR and ENH phases (p < 0.001). Quantitation of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) in IT and IC phases are 1317.9 ± 332.9 and 673.4 ± 562.1 S/CO, respectively (p < 0.001). Hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) quantitation in the four groups were 9.48 ± 3.3, 11.7 ± 2.8, 11.2 ± 2.6 and 13.2 ± 2.9 S/CO, respectively. Area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) of HBsAg and HBeAg at cutoff values of 4.41 log10 IU/mL and 1118.96 S/CO for differentiation of IT and IC phases are 0.984 and 0.828, with sensitivity 94.4 and 85.2 %, specificity 98.7 and 75 %, respectively. AUCs of HBsAg and HBcAb at cutoff values of 3.4 log10 IU/mL and 10.5 S/CO for differentiation of LR and ENT phases are 0.796 and 0.705, with sensitivity 58.1 and 85.7 %, and specificity 94.4 and 46.2 %, respectively.
HBsAg quantitation has high predictive value and HBeAg quantitation has moderate predictive value for discriminating IT and IC phase. HBsAg and HBcAb quantitations have moderate predictive values for differentiation of LR and ENH phase.
本研究旨在明确血清乙肝病毒标志物定量在乙肝病毒感染自然阶段鉴别中的作用。
回顾性分析184例慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者。根据临床、生化、血清学、乙肝病毒DNA水平及组织学数据,将患者分为四类:免疫耐受期(IT,n = 36)、免疫清除期(IC,n = 81)、低复制期(LR,n = 31)和HBeAg阴性肝炎期(ENH,n = 36)。
四个阶段的乙肝表面抗原(HBsAg)定量分别为4.7 ± 0.2、3.8 ± 0.5、2.5 ± 1.2和3.4 ± 0.4 log10 IU/mL。IT期与IC期之间(p < 0.001)以及LR期与ENH期之间(p < 0.001)存在显著差异。IT期和IC期的乙肝e抗原(HBeAg)定量分别为1317.9 ± 332.9和673.4 ± 562.1 S/CO(p < 0.001)。四组的乙肝核心抗体(HBcAb)定量分别为9.48 ± 3.3、11.7 ± 2.8、11.2 ± 2.6和13.2 ± 2.9 S/CO。对于鉴别IT期和IC期,HBsAg和HBeAg在临界值4.41 log10 IU/mL和1118.96 S/CO时的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUCs)分别为
0.984和0.828,敏感性分别为94.4%和85.2%,特异性分别为98.7%和75%。对于鉴别LR期和ENT期,HBsAg和HBcAb在临界值3.4 log10 IU/mL和10.5 S/CO时的AUCs分别为0.796和0.705,敏感性分别为58.1%和85.7%,特异性分别为94.4%和46.2%。
HBsAg定量对鉴别IT期和IC期具有较高预测价值,HBeAg定量具有中等预测价值。HBsAg和HBcAb定量对鉴别LR期和ENH期具有中等预测价值。