Itoh K, Freter R
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109.
Infect Immun. 1989 Feb;57(2):559-65. doi: 10.1128/iai.57.2.559-565.1989.
The function of indigenous lactobacilli in the control of other intestinal microbial species is not clear. Still more controversial is the effect of dietary bacterial supplements containing lactobacilli or other species. This situation is unlikely to change unless the mechanisms that control the colonization of ingested bacteria are better understood, and until more detailed information becomes available on the mechanisms by which certain populations of indigenous bacteria can affect the population sizes of other species. We used gnotobiotic mice and a continuous-flow culture system to study the interactions between Escherichia coli and (i) clostridia (in chloroform-treated cecal suspensions from conventional mice) and (ii) three strains of lactobacilli isolated from conventional mice. In gnotobiotic mice, the lactobacilli suppressed E. coli multiplication in the stomach and the small intestine, but had no demonstrable effect on E. coli multiplication in the large intestine. In contrast, clostridia were most effective in controlling E. coli multiplication in the large intestine. In the presence of both lactobacilli and clostridia, E. coli populations in the various regions of the gastrointestinal tract resembled those found in conventionalized control animals. The control of E. coli populations was not related to changes in pH or intestinal motility. In vitro stimulation of the above-described in vivo interactions required a two-stage continuous-flow culture in which the effluent from the first stage represented the influx to the second. The first stage was inoculated with lactobacilli, and the second stage was inoculated with either a pure culture of E. coli or E. coli and clostridia. In these instances, the E. coli populations in the second stage of the culture resembled in size those found in the large intestine of gnotobiotic mice harboring a similar flora. Although there are some current shortcomings of this in vitro model, we expect that a multistage continuous-flow culture can be developed to satisfactorily model the interactions among bacterial populations along the entire gastrointestinal tract.
本土乳酸杆菌在控制其他肠道微生物种类方面的作用尚不清楚。含有乳酸杆菌或其他菌种的膳食细菌补充剂的效果更具争议性。除非能更好地理解控制摄入细菌定植的机制,并且能获得关于某些本土细菌群体影响其他菌种数量的机制的更详细信息,否则这种情况不太可能改变。我们使用无菌小鼠和连续流动培养系统来研究大肠杆菌与(i)梭菌(来自常规小鼠经氯仿处理的盲肠悬液)以及(ii)从常规小鼠分离的三株乳酸杆菌之间的相互作用。在无菌小鼠中,乳酸杆菌抑制了大肠杆菌在胃和小肠中的增殖,但对大肠杆菌在大肠中的增殖没有明显影响。相比之下,梭菌在控制大肠杆菌在大肠中的增殖方面最为有效。在同时存在乳酸杆菌和梭菌的情况下,胃肠道各个区域的大肠杆菌数量与常规对照动物中的相似。大肠杆菌数量的控制与pH值或肠道蠕动的变化无关。体外模拟上述体内相互作用需要两阶段连续流动培养,其中第一阶段的流出物代表进入第二阶段的流入物。第一阶段接种乳酸杆菌,第二阶段接种大肠杆菌纯培养物或大肠杆菌与梭菌。在这些情况下,培养第二阶段的大肠杆菌数量在大小上与携带相似菌群的无菌小鼠大肠中的大肠杆菌数量相似。尽管这个体外模型目前存在一些缺点,但我们预计可以开发一种多阶段连续流动培养来令人满意地模拟整个胃肠道细菌群体之间的相互作用。