• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

筛查有自杀风险学生时的重要变量:SEYLE研究法国队列的结果

Important Variables When Screening for Students at Suicidal Risk: Findings from the French Cohort of the SEYLE Study.

作者信息

Kahn Jean-Pierre, Tubiana Alexandra, Cohen Renaud F, Carli Vladimir, Wasserman Camilla, Hoven Christina, Sarchiapone Marco, Wasserman Danuta

机构信息

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nancy, Hôpitaux de Brabois, Vandoeuvre les Nancy 54511, France.

Université de Lorraine, Faculté de Médecine, Vandoeuvre les Nancy 54505, France.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Sep 30;12(10):12277-90. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121012277.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph121012277
PMID:26437422
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4626968/
Abstract

Due to early detection of mental ill-health being an important suicide preventive strategy, the multi-centre EU funded "Saving and Empowering Young Lives in Europe" (SEYLE) study compared three school-based mental health promotion programs to a control group. In France, 1007 students with a mean age of 15.2 years were recruited from 20 randomly assigned schools. This paper explores the French results of the SEYLE's two-stage screening program (ProfScreen) and of the cross-program suicidal emergency procedure. Two-hundred-thirty-five ProfScreen students were screened using 13 psychopathological and risk behaviour scales. Students considered at risk because of a positive finding on one or more scales were offered a clinical interview and, if necessary, referred for treatment. A procedure for suicidal students (emergency cases) was set up to detect emergencies in the whole cohort (n = 1007). Emergency cases were offered the same clinical interview as the ProfScreen students. The interviewers documented their reasons for referrals in a short report. 16,2% of the ProfScreen students (38/235) were referred to treatment and 2,7% of the emergency cases (27/1007) were also referred to treatment due to high suicidal risk. Frequent symptoms in those students referred for evaluation were depression, alcohol misuse, non-suicidal self-injuries (NSSI), and suicidal behaviours. According to the multivariate regression analysis of ProfScreen, the results show that the best predictors for treatment referral were NSSI (OR 2.85), alcohol misuse (OR 2.80), and depressive symptoms (OR 1.13). Analysis of the proportion for each scale of students referred to treatment showed that poor social relationships (60%), anxiety (50%), and suicidal behaviours (50%) generated the highest rate of referrals. Qualitative analysis of clinician's motivations to refer a student to mental health services revealed that depressive symptoms (51%), anxiety (38%), suicidal behaviours (40%), and negative life events (35%) were the main reasons for referrals. Thus, not only the classical psychopathological symptoms, such as depression, anxiety, and suicidal behaviours, but also negative life events and poor social relationships (especially isolation) motivate referrals for treatment.

摘要

由于早期发现心理健康问题是一项重要的自杀预防策略,由欧盟资助的多中心“拯救并赋权欧洲年轻人生命”(SEYLE)研究将三项基于学校的心理健康促进项目与一个对照组进行了比较。在法国,从20所随机分配的学校招募了1007名平均年龄为15.2岁的学生。本文探讨了SEYLE两阶段筛查项目(ProfScreen)以及跨项目自杀紧急程序在法国的结果。235名ProfScreen学生使用13种心理病理学和风险行为量表进行了筛查。因在一个或多个量表上有阳性发现而被认为有风险的学生接受了临床访谈,必要时会被转介接受治疗。为自杀学生(紧急情况)设立了一个程序,以在整个队列(n = 1007)中检测紧急情况。紧急情况的学生与ProfScreen学生接受相同的临床访谈。访谈者在一份简短报告中记录了他们转介的原因。16.2%的ProfScreen学生(38/235)被转介接受治疗,2.7%的紧急情况学生(27/1007)也因自杀风险高而被转介接受治疗。那些被转介评估的学生中常见的症状有抑郁、酒精滥用、非自杀性自伤(NSSI)和自杀行为。根据ProfScreen的多变量回归分析,结果表明治疗转介的最佳预测因素是NSSI(比值比2.85)、酒精滥用(比值比2.80)和抑郁症状(比值比1.13)。对每个量表被转介治疗的学生比例分析表明,不良社会关系(60%)、焦虑(50%)和自杀行为(50%)导致的转介率最高。对临床医生将学生转介至心理健康服务机构动机的定性分析表明,抑郁症状(51%)、焦虑(38%)、自杀行为(40%)和负面生活事件(35%)是转介的主要原因。因此,不仅是抑郁、焦虑和自杀行为等经典的心理病理学症状,还有负面生活事件和不良社会关系(尤其是孤独)促使了治疗转介。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f677/4626968/fa72d40cb245/ijerph-12-12277-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f677/4626968/5b0d5328ab92/ijerph-12-12277-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f677/4626968/fa72d40cb245/ijerph-12-12277-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f677/4626968/5b0d5328ab92/ijerph-12-12277-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f677/4626968/fa72d40cb245/ijerph-12-12277-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Important Variables When Screening for Students at Suicidal Risk: Findings from the French Cohort of the SEYLE Study.筛查有自杀风险学生时的重要变量:SEYLE研究法国队列的结果
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Sep 30;12(10):12277-90. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121012277.
2
Review of health and risk-behaviours, mental health problems and suicidal behaviours in young Europeans on the basis of the results from the EU-funded Saving and Empowering Young Lives in Europe (SEYLE) study.基于欧盟资助的“拯救与赋权欧洲年轻人生命”(SEYLE)研究结果,对欧洲年轻人的健康与风险行为、心理健康问题及自杀行为进行综述。
Psychiatr Pol. 2016 Dec 23;50(6):1093-1107. doi: 10.12740/PP/66954.
3
School-based suicide prevention programmes: the SEYLE cluster-randomised, controlled trial.基于学校的自杀预防计划:SEYLE 集群随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2015 Apr 18;385(9977):1536-44. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61213-7. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
4
Direct Self-Injurious Behavior (D-SIB) and Life Events among Vocational School and High School Students.职业学校和高中生的直接自伤行为 (D-SIB) 和生活事件。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 24;15(6):1068. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061068.
5
The impact of school-based screening on service use in adolescents at risk for mental health problems and risk-behaviour.基于学校的筛查对有心理健康问题和风险行为风险的青少年的服务利用的影响。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Sep;32(9):1745-1754. doi: 10.1007/s00787-022-01990-z. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
6
Twelve-month service use, suicidality and mental health problems of European adolescents after a school-based screening for current suicidality.基于学校的当前自杀意念筛查后,欧洲青少年的 12 个月服务使用情况、自杀意念和心理健康问题。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;31(2):229-238. doi: 10.1007/s00787-020-01681-7. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
7
Help-seeking behaviour following school-based screening for current suicidality among European adolescents.欧洲青少年在校进行当前自杀倾向筛查后的求助行为。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;50(6):973-82. doi: 10.1007/s00127-015-1016-3. Epub 2015 Feb 6.
8
Student assistance program outcomes for students at risk for suicide.针对有自杀风险学生的学生援助计划成果。
J Sch Nurs. 2014 Jun;30(3):173-86. doi: 10.1177/1059840514525968. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
9
Saving and empowering young lives in Europe (SEYLE): a randomized controlled trial.拯救和赋权欧洲的年轻生命(SEYLE):一项随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Apr 13;10:192. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-192.
10
School-Based Health Centers, Depression, and Suicide Risk Among Adolescents.学校卫生保健中心与青少年抑郁和自杀风险
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Jan;54(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.08.022. Epub 2017 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of school-based screening on service use in adolescents at risk for mental health problems and risk-behaviour.基于学校的筛查对有心理健康问题和风险行为风险的青少年的服务利用的影响。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Sep;32(9):1745-1754. doi: 10.1007/s00787-022-01990-z. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
2
Acceptability of screening for mental health difficulties in primary schools: a survey of UK parents.在小学筛查心理健康问题的可接受性:对英国家长的调查。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 22;18(1):1404. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6279-7.

本文引用的文献

1
A newly identified group of adolescents at "invisible" risk for psychopathology and suicidal behavior: findings from the SEYLE study.一个新识别出的处于精神病理学和自杀行为“隐形”风险的青少年群体:来自 SEYLE 研究的结果。
World Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;13(1):78-86. doi: 10.1002/wps.20088.
2
Risk-behaviour screening for identifying adolescents with mental health problems in Europe.欧洲青少年心理健康问题的风险行为筛查。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014 Jul;23(7):611-20. doi: 10.1007/s00787-013-0490-y. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
3
Life events: a complex role in the timing of suicidal behavior among depressed patients.
生活事件:在抑郁症患者自杀行为发生时间方面的复杂作用。
Mol Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;19(8):902-9. doi: 10.1038/mp.2013.128. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
4
Psychosocial stressors and patterns of coping in adolescent suicide attempters.青少年自杀未遂者的心理社会压力源及应对模式。
Indian J Psychol Med. 2013 Jan;35(1):39-46. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.112200.
5
The saving and empowering young lives in Europe (SEYLE) randomized controlled trial (RCT): methodological issues and participant characteristics.拯救和赋权欧洲年轻人(SEYLE)随机对照试验(RCT):方法学问题和参与者特征。
BMC Public Health. 2013 May 16;13:479. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-479.
6
A brief intervention is sufficient for many adolescents seeking help from low threshold adolescent psychiatric services.对于许多寻求低门槛青少年精神科服务的青少年来说,简短的干预就足够了。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Sep 6;10:261. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-261.
7
Identifying adolescents at risk through voluntary school-based mental health screening.通过自愿的学校心理健康筛查识别处于风险中的青少年。
J Adolesc. 2011 Jun;34(3):505-11. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.05.018. Epub 2010 Jun 18.
8
Saving and empowering young lives in Europe (SEYLE): a randomized controlled trial.拯救和赋权欧洲的年轻生命(SEYLE):一项随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Apr 13;10:192. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-192.
9
Why do many psychiatric disorders emerge during adolescence?为什么许多精神疾病在青春期出现?
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Dec;9(12):947-57. doi: 10.1038/nrn2513. Epub 2008 Nov 12.
10
Global suicide rates among young people aged 15-19.全球 15-19 岁青少年的自杀率。
World Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;4(2):114-20.