García-Hermoso Antonio, Martínez-Vizcaíno Vicente, Sánchez-López Mairena, Recio-Rodriguez Jose I, Gómez-Marcos Manuel A, García-Ortiz Luis
Laboratorio de Ciencias de la Actividad Física, el Deporte y la Salud, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, USACH, Santiago, Chile.
Health and Social Research Center, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Edificio Melchor Cano, Centro de Estudios Socio-Sanitarios, Santa Teresa Jornet s/n, 16071, Cuenca, Spain.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Jun 20;12:78. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0244-y.
Public health strategies for cardiovascular prevention highlight the importance of physical activity, but do not consider the additional potentially harmful effects of sedentary behavior. This study was conducted between 2010 and 2012 and analyzed between 2013 and 2014. The aim of the study was to analyze the relationship between sedentary behavior and cardiometabolic risk factors in the Spanish adult population and to examine whether this relationship is mediated by moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA).
The cross-sectional study included 1122 healthy subjects belonging to the EVIDENT study. Sedentary behavior was objectively measured over 7 days using Actigraph accelerometers. We assessed waist circumference (WC), triglycerides-to-HDL-C ratio (TG/HDL-C), and mean arterial pressure (MAP), and undertook homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR). Linear regression models were fitted according to Baron and Kenny procedures for mediation analysis.
TG/HDL-C and HOMA-IR were significantly higher in adults who spent more minutes in sedentary activities after adjusting for potential covariates. However when MVPA was added to the ANCOVA models as covariate the effect of sedentary time on HOMA-IR disappeared. In addition, MVPA acted as a full mediator of the relationship between sedentary time and HOMA-IR. In contrast, subjects with lower levels of MVPA presented worse cardiometabolic profiles than those from higher MVPA categories, even after controlling for sedentary time and other potential confounders.
These results suggest that both MVPA and sedentary time should be considered when developing cardiometabolic risk guidelines.
NCT01083082 .
心血管疾病预防的公共卫生策略强调身体活动的重要性,但未考虑久坐行为可能带来的额外有害影响。本研究于2010年至2012年开展,并于2013年至2014年进行分析。研究目的是分析西班牙成年人群中久坐行为与心血管代谢危险因素之间的关系,并检验这种关系是否由中等到剧烈身体活动(MVPA)介导。
这项横断面研究纳入了1122名参与EVIDENT研究的健康受试者。使用Actigraph加速度计客观测量7天的久坐行为。我们评估了腰围(WC)、甘油三酯与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值(TG/HDL-C)以及平均动脉压(MAP),并进行了稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)。根据Baron和Kenny程序拟合线性回归模型进行中介分析。
在调整潜在协变量后,久坐活动时间较长的成年人中,TG/HDL-C和HOMA-IR显著更高。然而,当将MVPA作为协变量添加到协方差分析模型中时,久坐时间对HOMA-IR的影响消失。此外,MVPA充当了久坐时间与HOMA-IR之间关系的完全中介变量。相比之下,即使在控制了久坐时间和其他潜在混杂因素后,MVPA水平较低的受试者的心血管代谢状况仍比MVPA水平较高的受试者更差。
这些结果表明,在制定心血管代谢风险指南时,应同时考虑MVPA和久坐时间。
NCT01083082 。