Suppr超能文献

健康老龄化研究预先研究指令的实践与伦理层面:德国和以色列专业人士的观点

Practical and Ethical Aspects of Advance Research Directives for Research on Healthy Aging: German and Israeli Professionals' Perspectives.

作者信息

Werner Perla, Schicktanz Silke

机构信息

Department of Community Mental Health, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.

Institute of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Apr 5;5:81. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00081. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

is the development and maintenance of optimal cognitive, social and physical well-being, and function in older adults. Preventing or minimizing disease is one of the main ways of achieving healthy aging. Dementia is one of the most prevalent and life-changing diseases of old age. Thus, dementia prevention research is defined as one of the main priorities worldwide. However, conducting research with persons who lack the capacity to give consent is a major ethical issue.

OBJECTIVE

Our study attempts to explore if and how advance research directives (ARDs) may be used as a future tool to deal with the ethical and practical issues in dementia research.

METHOD

We conducted focus groups and in-depth interviews with German and Israeli professional stakeholders from the fields of gerontology, ethics, medical law, psychiatry, neurology and policy advice ( = 16), and analyzed the main topics discussed regarding cross-national similarities and controversies within the groups, as well as across the two national contexts.

RESULTS

While both countries are in the midst of a developmental process and have recognized the importance and need for ARD as a tool for expanding healthy aging, Germany is in a more advanced stage than Israel because of the EU regulation process, which indicates the influence of international harmonization on these research-related ethical issues. Consensual themes within the qualitative material were identified: the need for a broader debate on ARD, the ethical importance of autonomy and risk-benefit assessment for ARD implementation, the role of the proxy and the need for the differentiation of types of dementia research. Controversies and dilemmas aroused around themes such as the current role of IRBs in each country, the need for limits, and how to guaranty safeguarding and control.

DISCUSSION

Implementing a new tool is a step-by-step procedure requiring a thorough understanding of the current state of knowledge as well as of the challenges and hurdles ahead. As long as improving quality of life and promoting autonomy continue to be core elements in the process of healthy aging, efforts to advance knowledge and solve dilemmas associated with the implementation of ARD is of the utmost importance.

摘要

背景

健康老龄化是指老年人实现最佳认知、社交和身体幸福感以及功能的发展和维持。预防疾病或将疾病影响降至最低是实现健康老龄化的主要途径之一。痴呆症是老年人群中最常见且改变生活的疾病之一。因此,痴呆症预防研究被确定为全球的主要优先事项之一。然而,对缺乏同意能力的人开展研究是一个重大伦理问题。

目的

我们的研究试图探讨预先研究指令(ARDs)是否以及如何能够作为未来的一种工具,来处理痴呆症研究中的伦理和实际问题。

方法

我们对来自老年医学、伦理学、医事法学、精神病学、神经病学及政策咨询领域的德国和以色列专业利益相关者开展了焦点小组讨论和深度访谈(共16人),并分析了小组内以及两个国家背景下所讨论的关于跨国相似性和争议的主要议题。

结果

虽然两国都处于发展进程中,且已认识到ARD作为促进健康老龄化工具的重要性和必要性,但由于欧盟的监管程序,德国比以色列处于更先进的阶段,这表明国际协调对这些与研究相关的伦理问题产生了影响。在定性材料中确定了共识性主题:需要就ARD进行更广泛的辩论、ARD实施中自主性和风险效益评估的伦理重要性、代理人的作用以及区分痴呆症研究类型的必要性。围绕各国伦理审查委员会(IRBs)的当前作用、限制的必要性以及如何保证保障和控制等主题引发了争议和困境。

讨论

实施一种新工具是一个循序渐进的过程,需要全面了解当前的知识状态以及未来的挑战和障碍。只要提高生活质量和促进自主性仍然是健康老龄化过程中的核心要素,推进与ARD实施相关的知识并解决困境的努力就至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验