• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

任务转移:一种在医疗服务不足地区进行丙型肝炎分散治疗的方法。

Task-Shifting: An Approach to Decentralized Hepatitis C Treatment in Medically Underserved Areas.

作者信息

Jayasekera Channa R, Perumpail Ryan B, Chao David T, Pham Edward A, Aggarwal Avin, Wong Robert J, Ahmed Aijaz

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Dec;60(12):3552-7. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3911-6.

DOI:10.1007/s10620-015-3911-6
PMID:26467703
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the availability of safe and effective direct-acting antiviral drugs (DAAs), the vast majority of patients with chronic hepatitis C (HCV) in the USA remain untreated, in part due to lack of access to specialist providers.

AIMS

To determine the effectiveness of DAA-based treatment in medically underserved areas in California, in a healthcare model dependent on task-shifting--wherein a visiting hepatologist assesses patients for treatment eligibility, but subsequent routine follow-up evaluation of patients prescribed treatment is devolved to a part-time licensed vocational nurse under remote supervision of the hepatologist.

METHODS

We retrospectively determined rates of sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment completion (SVR-12), adverse events, and treatment discontinuations in patients who received sofosbuvir-based DAA regimens between December 2013 and November 2014.

RESULTS

Despite limited specialist provider involvement in medically underserved areas, all but two of 58 patients completed treatment, and 88 % of patients achieved the curative endpoint of undetectable HCV RNA 12 weeks after completing treatment (sustained virologic response, SVR-12). Almost 80 % of patients with cirrhosis and 85 % of patients with prior treatment experience achieved SVR-12.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment effectiveness with sofosbuvir-based regimens in medically underserved areas utilizing task-shifting from a specialist to a mid-level provider is comparable to those achieved in pivotal clinical trials for these regimens, and to “real-world” experiences of tertiary care centers in the USA.

摘要

背景

尽管有安全有效的直接抗病毒药物(DAA),但美国绝大多数慢性丙型肝炎(HCV)患者仍未接受治疗,部分原因是难以获得专科医生的服务。

目的

在一种依赖任务转移的医疗模式下,确定基于DAA的治疗在加利福尼亚州医疗服务不足地区的有效性。在这种模式中,出诊的肝病专家评估患者的治疗资格,但后续对接受治疗的患者的常规随访评估则下放给一名兼职执业职业护士,由肝病专家进行远程监督。

方法

我们回顾性地确定了2013年12月至2014年11月期间接受基于索磷布韦的DAA治疗方案的患者在治疗完成后12周的持续病毒学应答率(SVR-12)、不良事件和治疗中断情况。

结果

尽管专科医生在医疗服务不足地区的参与有限,但58例患者中除2例之外均完成了治疗,88%的患者在完成治疗12周后达到了HCV RNA检测不到的治愈终点(持续病毒学应答,SVR-12)。近80%的肝硬化患者和85%有既往治疗经历的患者实现了SVR-12。

结论

在医疗服务不足地区,利用从专科医生到中级医疗人员的任务转移模式,基于索磷布韦的治疗方案的有效性与这些方案在关键临床试验中所取得的效果相当,也与美国三级医疗中心的“真实世界”经验相当。

相似文献

1
Task-Shifting: An Approach to Decentralized Hepatitis C Treatment in Medically Underserved Areas.任务转移:一种在医疗服务不足地区进行丙型肝炎分散治疗的方法。
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Dec;60(12):3552-7. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3911-6.
2
The Role of e-Health in Optimizing Task-Shifting in the Delivery of Antiviral Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis C.电子健康在优化慢性丙型肝炎抗病毒治疗任务转移中的作用。
Telemed J E Health. 2017 Oct;23(10):870-873. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2016.0189. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
3
Direct antiviral therapy for treatment of hepatitis C: A real-world study from Brazil.直接抗病毒疗法治疗丙型肝炎:巴西的真实世界研究。
Ann Hepatol. 2019 Nov-Dec;18(6):849-854. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
4
Sofosbuvir-based regimens in clinical practice achieve SVR rates closer to clinical trials: results from ERCHIVES.基于索磷布韦的治疗方案在临床实践中实现的持续病毒学应答率更接近临床试验:来自ERCHIVES的结果。
Liver Int. 2016 May;36(5):651-8. doi: 10.1111/liv.13036. Epub 2015 Dec 25.
5
Simeprevir and Sofosbuvir (SMV-SOF) for 12 Weeks for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Infection: A Real World (Transplant) Hepatology Practice Experience.西米普明和索非布韦(SMV-SOF)治疗12周用于慢性丙型肝炎基因1型感染:真实世界(移植)肝病学实践经验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb;111(2):250-60. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.422. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
6
Efficacy and Safety of Direct Acting Antivirals in Kidney Transplant Recipients with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection.直接作用抗病毒药物在慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染肾移植受者中的疗效与安全性
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 14;11(7):e0158431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158431. eCollection 2016.
7
Adding ribavirin to newer DAA regimens does not affect SVR rates in HCV genotype 1 infected persons: results from ERCHIVES.在新型直接抗病毒药物(DAA)治疗方案中添加利巴韦林,对丙型肝炎病毒1型感染者的持续病毒学应答率无影响:来自ERCHIVES的结果。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Oct;44(7):728-37. doi: 10.1111/apt.13748. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
8
Real-world effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir hepatitis C treatment in a single centre in Germany.德国单一中心研究索磷布韦/维帕他韦和来迪派韦/索磷布韦治疗丙型肝炎的真实世界疗效和安全性。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 4;14(4):e0214795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214795. eCollection 2019.
9
Sofosbuvir-Daclatasvir-Simeprevir Plus Ribavirin in Direct-Acting Antiviral-Experienced Patients With Hepatitis C.索磷布韦-达拉他韦-西美瑞韦联合利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎直接作用抗病毒药物治疗经验患者。
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Jun 1;64(11):1615-1618. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix214.
10
Safety and Effectiveness of Ledipasvir and Sofosbuvir, With or Without Ribavirin, in Treatment-Experienced Patients With Genotype 1 Hepatitis C Virus Infection and Cirrhosis.利巴韦林联合或不联合索磷布韦与达卡他韦治疗慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染和肝硬化患者的安全性和有效性
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Nov;16(11):1811-1819.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.12.037. Epub 2018 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Rural providers' attitudes toward integrating harm reduction strategies and PrEP prescribing into rural primary care settings in the US. Southeast and Midwest.美国东南部和中西部农村医疗服务提供者对将减少伤害策略和暴露前预防(PrEP)处方纳入农村初级保健环境的态度。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2025 Sep 12;20(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13722-025-00584-9.
2
Hepatitis C models of care: approaches to elimination.丙型肝炎护理模式:消除丙型肝炎的方法。
Can Liver J. 2020 Jun 4;3(2):165-176. doi: 10.3138/canlivj.2019-0002. eCollection 2020 Spring.
3
Effectiveness of a Decentralized Hub and Spoke Model for the Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus in a Federally Qualified Health Center.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of sofosbuvir-based regimens in genotype 1 and 2 hepatitis C virus infection in 4026 U.S. Veterans.4026 名美国退伍军人中基于索磷布韦的方案治疗 1 型和 2 型丙型肝炎病毒感染的疗效。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Sep;42(5):559-73. doi: 10.1111/apt.13300. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
2
Increases in hepatitis C virus infection related to injection drug use among persons aged ≤30 years - Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia, 2006-2012.2006 - 2012年,肯塔基州、田纳西州、弗吉尼亚州和西弗吉尼亚州30岁及以下人群中与注射吸毒相关的丙型肝炎病毒感染增加情况。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 May 8;64(17):453-8.
3
Cost-effectiveness of novel regimens for the treatment of hepatitis C virus.
分散式中心辐射模型在联邦合格健康中心治疗丙型肝炎病毒的效果。
Hepatol Commun. 2020 Dec 21;5(3):412-423. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1617. eCollection 2021 Mar.
4
Effectiveness of implementing a decentralized delivery of hepatitis C virus treatment with direct-acting antivirals: A systematic review with meta-analysis.直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎病毒的去中心化实施效果:系统评价与荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 21;15(2):e0229143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229143. eCollection 2020.
5
Micro-costing analysis of guideline-based treatment by direct-acting agents: the real-life case of hepatitis C management in Brazil.基于直接作用抗病毒药物的指南治疗的微观成本分析:巴西丙型肝炎管理的实际案例
BMC Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov 23;17(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12876-017-0676-8.
6
Sofosbuvir-based Regimens with Task Shifting Is Cost-effective in Expanding Hepatitis C Treatment Access in the United States.基于索磷布韦的任务转移方案在美国扩大丙型肝炎治疗可及性方面具有成本效益。
J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2017 Mar 28;5(1):16-22. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2016.00052. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
7
Management of chronic Hepatitis C at a primary health clinic in the high-burden context of Karachi, Pakistan.在巴基斯坦卡拉奇高负担环境下的一家初级保健诊所中对慢性丙型肝炎的管理。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 27;12(4):e0175562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175562. eCollection 2017.
8
Feasibility of improving child behavioral health using task-shifting to implement the 4Rs and 2Ss program for strengthening families in child welfare.通过任务转移实施4R和2S计划以加强儿童福利中的家庭从而改善儿童行为健康的可行性。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016;2. doi: 10.1186/s40814-016-0062-2. Epub 2016 May 2.
新型丙型肝炎病毒治疗方案的成本效益分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Mar 17;162(6):407-19. doi: 10.7326/M14-1152.
4
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of hepatitis C virus treatment with sofosbuvir and ledipasvir in the United States.索磷布韦和来迪帕司韦治疗丙型肝炎病毒在美国的成本效益和预算影响
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Mar 17;162(6):397-406. doi: 10.7326/M14-1336.
5
Contextual analysis of determinants of late diagnosis of hepatitis C virus infection in medicare patients.医疗保险患者丙型肝炎病毒感染晚期诊断决定因素的语境分析。
Hepatology. 2015 Jul;62(1):68-78. doi: 10.1002/hep.27775. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
6
Simeprevir plus sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, to treat chronic infection with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 in non-responders to pegylated interferon and ribavirin and treatment-naive patients: the COSMOS randomised study.simeprevir 联合索非布韦,无论是否联合利巴韦林,治疗对聚乙二醇干扰素和利巴韦林无应答且未经治疗的慢性丙型肝炎病毒 1 型感染者:COSMOS 随机研究。
Lancet. 2014 Nov 15;384(9956):1756-65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61036-9. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
7
The treatment cascade for chronic hepatitis C virus infection in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis.美国慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染的治疗流程:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 2;9(7):e101554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101554. eCollection 2014.
8
Task shifting from doctors to non-doctors for initiation and maintenance of antiretroviral therapy.抗逆转录病毒疗法的启动和维持工作从医生向非医生的任务转移。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 1;2014(7):CD007331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007331.pub3.
9
Sofosbuvir and ribavirin in HCV genotypes 2 and 3.索磷布韦和利巴韦林治疗 2 型和 3 型丙型肝炎病毒。
N Engl J Med. 2014 May 22;370(21):1993-2001. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1316145. Epub 2014 May 4.
10
Chronic hepatitis C virus infection in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003 to 2010.美国慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染,2003 年至 2010 年全国健康和营养调查。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Mar 4;160(5):293-300. doi: 10.7326/M13-1133.