Schmelzer Marilee, Daniels Glenda, Hough Helen
1University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, USA2Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas, USA3The Texas Christian University Center for Evidence Based Practice and Research: a Collaborating Center of the Joanna Briggs Institute, Texas, USA.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Sep;13(9):187-243. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2307.
Flexible endoscopes are used to diagnose and treat gastrointestinal and pulmonary diseases. They have narrow, internal channels which are used to insert instruments, air and water into hollow organs and to remove tissues and secretions. Since endoscopes are contaminated during use and have heat sensitive components that cannot be sterilized, they are reprocessed with cleaning and high-level disinfection to destroy microorganisms. Knowing how long reprocessed endoscopes can be safely stored is essential for preventing infection and decreasing unnecessary costs.
The objective was to systematically review the best available evidence related to safe storage time (in days) of flexible endoscopes that have undergone reprocessing in order to determine when they can be safely used again without posing any risk of contamination from pathogens.
The types of equipment were flexible endoscopes that had been reprocessed according to recommended guidelines, stored for a specified period of time, and tested for microorganisms.The intervention was the length of time (in days) that reprocessed endoscopes were appropriately stored before use.This review included non-randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies.This review considered studies that included the outcome measure: microbial growth on endoscopes which was measured with microbiological cultures.
The search strategy aimed to find studies in English and Spanish and included published and unpublished studies from 1990 to 2014. An initial search of CINAHL, MEDLINE/PUBMed and EMBASE was conducted followed by an analysis of the text words contained in the title and abstract and index terms used to describe the articles. Next, a search using all identified keywords and index terms was undertaken across all included databases. Then, the reference lists of all identified reports and articles were searched for additional studies. A citation search was performed in order to find additional studies that cited those already located.
The Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal instruments were used to assess methodological quality.
Data were extracted from studies in the review using the Joanna Briggs Institute data extraction form.
Since the findings were expressed using descriptive statistics, a meta-analysis was impossible. Therefore, the findings have been summarized in a narrative form with tables and a figure.
Ten studies met the appraisal criteria and were included in the review. Storage time ranged from two to 56 days, and all 10 studies concluded that endoscopes could safely be stored for the time measured. Seven studies measured microbial growth in all channels; six involved storing the endoscopes for at least three days and five for at least seven days. The contamination rates were low (2% at three days and 4% at seven days) and pathogens were rare. The contamination rate remained consistent over time.
Endoscopes can be stored for seven days if they have been effectively reprocessed and appropriately stored. Ongoing surveillance cultures are necessary to verify reprocessing effectiveness.
软性内窥镜用于诊断和治疗胃肠道及肺部疾病。它们有狭窄的内部通道,用于将器械、空气和水插入中空器官,并清除组织和分泌物。由于内窥镜在使用过程中会被污染,且有不能进行灭菌的热敏部件,因此需通过清洗和高水平消毒进行再处理以杀灭微生物。了解再处理后的内窥镜能安全储存多长时间对于预防感染和降低不必要的成本至关重要。
本研究旨在系统回顾与经过再处理的软性内窥镜安全储存时间(以天为单位)相关的最佳现有证据,以确定它们何时可再次安全使用而不会带来任何病原体污染风险。
设备类型为已按照推荐指南进行再处理、储存特定时间段并进行微生物检测的软性内窥镜。干预措施为再处理后的内窥镜在使用前适当储存的时间长度(以天为单位)。本综述纳入非随机对照试验和前瞻性队列研究。本综述考虑的研究包括结局指标:通过微生物培养测量的内窥镜上的微生物生长情况。
检索策略旨在查找英文和西班牙文的研究,包括1990年至2014年发表和未发表的研究。首先对CINAHL、MEDLINE/PubMed和EMBASE进行初步检索,随后分析标题、摘要中包含的文本词以及用于描述文章的索引词。接下来,在所有纳入的数据库中使用所有确定的关键词和索引词进行检索。然后,检索所有已识别报告和文章的参考文献列表以查找其他研究。进行引文检索以查找引用已找到研究的其他研究。
使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的批判性评价工具评估方法学质量。
使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的数据提取表从综述中的研究中提取数据。
由于研究结果以描述性统计表示,因此无法进行荟萃分析。因此,研究结果已以叙述形式并结合表格和图表进行了总结。
10项研究符合评价标准并纳入本综述。储存时间从2天到56天不等,所有10项研究均得出内窥镜可在所测时间内安全储存的结论。7项研究测量了所有通道的微生物生长情况;6项研究涉及将内窥镜储存至少3天,5项研究涉及储存至少7天。污染率较低(3天时为2%,7天时为4%),病原体罕见。污染率随时间保持一致。
如果内窥镜已得到有效再处理并妥善储存,可储存7天。持续进行监测培养对于验证再处理效果是必要的。