Suppr超能文献

QUANTIFIERS UNDONE: REVERSING PREDICTABLE SPEECH ERRORS IN COMPREHENSION.

作者信息

Frazier Lyn, Clifton Charles

机构信息

University of Massachusetts Amherst.

出版信息

Language (Baltim). 2011 Mar 1;87(1):158-171. doi: 10.1353/lan.2011.0024.

Abstract

Speakers predictably make errors during spontaneous speech. Listeners may identify such errors and repair the input, or their analysis of the input, accordingly. Two written questionnaire studies investigated error compensation mechanisms in sentences with doubled quantifiers such as . Results show a considerable number of undoubled interpretations for all items tested (though fewer for sentences containing doubled negation than for sentences containing or This evidence shows that the compositional form-meaning pairing supplied by the grammar is not the only systematic mapping between form and meaning. Implicit knowledge of the workings of the performance systems provides an additional mechanism for pairing sentence form and meaning. Alternate accounts of the data based on either a concord interpretation or an emphatic interpretation of the doubled quantifier don't explain why listeners fail to apprehend the 'extra meaning' added by the potentially redundant material only in limited circumstances.

摘要

相似文献

1
QUANTIFIERS UNDONE: REVERSING PREDICTABLE SPEECH ERRORS IN COMPREHENSION.
Language (Baltim). 2011 Mar 1;87(1):158-171. doi: 10.1353/lan.2011.0024.
2
Without his shirt off he saved the child from almost drowning: interpreting an uncertain input.
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Jul 1;30(6):635-647. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2014.995109.
3
The logic in language: How all quantifiers are alike, but each quantifier is different.
Cogn Psychol. 2016 Jun;87:29-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 May 28.
4
Quantification, prediction, and the online impact of sentence truth-value: Evidence from event-related potentials.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Feb;42(2):316-34. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000173. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
5
How do people construct logical form during language comprehension?
Psychol Sci. 2010 Aug;21(8):1090-7. doi: 10.1177/0956797610375446. Epub 2010 Jun 29.
6
Children's knowledge of hierarchical phrase structure: quantifier floating in Japanese.
J Child Lang. 2013 Jun;40(3):628-55. doi: 10.1017/S0305000912000190. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
7
Talker-specificity and adaptation in quantifier interpretation.
J Mem Lang. 2016 Apr 1;87:128-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.08.003.
8
Semantic and pragmatic factors influencing deaf and hearing students' comprehension of english sentences containing numeral quantifiers.
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2011 Fall;16(4):419-36. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enr013. Epub 2011 May 4.
9
The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences revisited.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Aug;44(8):1286-1311. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000519. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
10
Neural correlates of fine-grained meaning distinctions: An fMRI investigation of scalar quantifiers.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Aug;38(8):3848-3864. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23633. Epub 2017 May 8.

引用本文的文献

1
A Note on the Voice Mismatch Asymmetry in Ellipsis.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2019 Aug;48(4):877-887. doi: 10.1007/s10936-019-09636-z.
2
Relating (Un)acceptability to Interpretation. Experimental Investigations on Negation.
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 2;8:2370. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02370. eCollection 2017.
3
Without his shirt off he saved the child from almost drowning: interpreting an uncertain input.
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Jul 1;30(6):635-647. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2014.995109.
4
Two interpretive systems for natural language?
J Psycholinguist Res. 2015 Feb;44(1):7-25. doi: 10.1007/s10936-014-9328-0.
5
Do Null Subjects (mis-)Trigger Pro-drop Grammars?
J Psycholinguist Res. 2015 Dec;44(6):669-74. doi: 10.1007/s10936-014-9312-8.
6
(Not) Hearing Optional Subjects: The Effects of Pragmatic Usage Preferences.
J Mem Lang. 2012 Jul 1;67(1):211-223. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.02.011. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
7
The Role of Non-Actuality Implicatures in Processing Elided Constituents.
J Mem Lang. 2012 Jan;66(1):326-343. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.09.003.

本文引用的文献

1
On the interpretation of the number attraction effect: Response time evidence.
J Mem Lang. 2009 Feb;60(2):308. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.11.002.
2
Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models.
J Mem Lang. 2008 Nov;59(4):434-446. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007.
3
Processing Elided Verb Phrases with Flawed Antecedents: the Recycling Hypothesis.
J Mem Lang. 2006 Aug;55(2):232-246. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.02.005.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验