• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测高水平的多任务处理可减少任务间的交互。

Predicting high levels of multitasking reduces between-tasks interactions.

作者信息

Fischer Rico, Dreisbach Gesine

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

Department of Experimental Psychology.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Dec;41(6):1482-7. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000157. Epub 2015 Oct 19.

DOI:10.1037/xhp0000157
PMID:26480246
Abstract

The simultaneous handling of 2 tasks requires shielding of the prioritized primary task (T1) from interference caused by the secondary task (T2) processing. Such interactions between tasks (e.g., between-task interference, or crosstalk) depend on the similarity of both tasks and are especially pronounced when both tasks overlap strongly in time. In the present study we investigated whether between-tasks interference can be reduced when specific items do not predict the level of interference but instead the degree of temporal proximity between both tasks. We implemented an item-specific proportion manipulation of temporal task overlap (stimulus onset asynchrony [SOA]). Selected stimuli of T1 predicted high temporal task overlap (short SOAs) in 80% of trials, whereas other stimuli of T1 predicted low temporal task overlap (long SOAs) in 80% of trials. Results showed that the predictive value of T1 stimuli determined the adjustment of T1 shielding. That is, interference from the secondary task was significantly reduced for items predicting high temporal task overlap compared to items predicting low temporal task overlap. It is important to note that task shielding was not initiated by predicting the actual conflict level (i.e., whether T1 and T2 required compatible/incompatible responses) between tasks but by specific items predicting conditions in which 2 tasks are likely to interact (i.e., short vs. long SOA). These findings offer new insights into the specificity of contextual bottom-up regulations of cognitive control.

摘要

同时处理两项任务需要对优先级较高的主要任务(T1)进行屏蔽,使其免受次要任务(T2)处理所造成的干扰。任务之间的这种相互作用(例如,任务间干扰或串扰)取决于两项任务的相似性,并且当两项任务在时间上高度重叠时尤为明显。在本研究中,我们调查了在特定项目不预测干扰水平而是预测两项任务之间的时间接近程度时,任务间干扰是否能够减少。我们对时间任务重叠(刺激开始异步性[SOA])实施了特定项目比例的操纵。T1的选定刺激在80%的试验中预测了高时间任务重叠(短SOA),而T1的其他刺激在80%的试验中预测了低时间任务重叠(长SOA)。结果表明,T1刺激的预测价值决定了T1屏蔽的调整。也就是说,与预测低时间任务重叠的项目相比,预测高时间任务重叠的项目受到次要任务的干扰显著减少。需要注意的是,任务屏蔽不是通过预测任务之间的实际冲突水平(即T1和T2是否需要兼容/不兼容的反应)来启动的,而是通过预测两项任务可能相互作用的条件(即短SOA与长SOA)的特定项目来启动的。这些发现为认知控制的情境自下而上调节的特异性提供了新的见解。

相似文献

1
Predicting high levels of multitasking reduces between-tasks interactions.预测高水平的多任务处理可减少任务间的交互。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Dec;41(6):1482-7. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000157. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
2
Modulating the interference effect in timing with varying stimulus onset asynchrony.通过改变刺激起始异步性来调节时间上的干扰效应。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2011 Sep;65(3):151-62. doi: 10.1037/a0022561.
3
No reduction of between-task interference in a dual-task with a repeating sequence of SOAs.在重复 SOA 双任务中,无任务间干扰减少。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Nov;221:103451. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103451. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
4
Dual-task interference and response strategies in simulated car driving: impact of first-task characteristics on the psychological refractory period effect.模拟驾驶中的双重任务干扰和反应策略:第一任务特征对心理不应期效应的影响。
Psychol Res. 2021 Mar;85(2):568-576. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01272-5. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
5
Single-task fMRI overlap predicts concurrent multitasking interference.单任务功能磁共振成像重叠可预测并发多任务干扰。
Neuroimage. 2014 Oct 15;100:60-74. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.082. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
6
Shielding and relaxation in multitasking: Prospect of reward counteracts relaxation of task shielding in multitasking.多任务处理中的屏蔽与放松:奖励预期抵消了多任务处理中任务屏蔽的放松。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Nov;191:112-123. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
7
Context-sensitive adjustment of cognitive control in dual-task performance.双任务表现中认知控制的上下文敏感调整。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Mar;40(2):399-416. doi: 10.1037/a0034310. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
8
Locus of semantic interference in picture naming: Evidence from dual-task performance.图片命名中的语义干扰焦点:来自双重任务表现的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jan;40(1):147-65. doi: 10.1037/a0033745. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
9
The role of temporal unpredictability for process interference and code overlap in perception-action dual tasks.时间不可预测性在感知-行动双重任务中对过程干扰和编码重叠的作用。
Psychol Res. 2003 Nov;67(4):244-52. doi: 10.1007/s00426-002-0125-2. Epub 2003 Mar 15.
10
Backward crosstalk and the role of dimensional overlap within and between tasks.反向串扰以及任务内部和任务之间维度重叠的作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Jul;188:139-147. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Modulation of the executive control network by anodal tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex improves task shielding in dual tasking.左背外侧前额叶经阳极 tDCS 调节可改善双重任务中的任务屏蔽作用。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 15;13(1):6177. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33057-7.
2
Bounded rational decision-making models suggest capacity-limited concurrent motor planning in human posterior parietal and frontal cortex.有界理性决策模型表明,人类顶后和额皮质存在容量有限的并发运动规划。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Oct 13;18(10):e1010585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010585. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
Why Does Dual-Tasking Hamper Implicit Sequence Learning?
为什么多任务处理会妨碍内隐序列学习?
J Cogn. 2021 Jan 7;4(1):1. doi: 10.5334/joc.136.
4
Common Cognitive Control Processes Underlying Performance in Task-Switching and Dual-Task Contexts.任务切换和双重任务情境下表现背后的常见认知控制过程。
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2018 Sep 30;14(3):62-74. doi: 10.5709/acp-0239-y. eCollection 2018.
5
Parallel and serial task processing in the PRP paradigm: a drift-diffusion model approach.PRP 范式中的并行和串行任务处理:漂移-扩散模型方法。
Psychol Res. 2021 Jun;85(4):1529-1552. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01337-w. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
6
Item-specific proportion congruency (ISPC) modulates, but does not generate, the backward crosstalk effect.项目特异性比例一致性(ISPC)调节但不产生反向串扰效应。
Psychol Res. 2021 Apr;85(3):1093-1107. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01318-z. Epub 2020 Mar 28.
7
Smaller backward crosstalk effects for free choice tasks are not the result of immediate conflict adaptation.自由选择任务中较小的反向串扰效应并非即时冲突适应的结果。
Cogn Process. 2019 Feb;20(1):73-85. doi: 10.1007/s10339-018-0887-0. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
8
Exploring the repetition bias in voluntary task switching.探索自愿任务切换中的重复偏差。
Psychol Res. 2018 Jan;82(1):78-91. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0911-5. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
9
Task Integration Facilitates Multitasking.任务整合有助于多任务处理。
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 15;8:398. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00398. eCollection 2017.
10
Hierarchical task organization in dual tasks: evidence for higher level task representations.双重任务中的分层任务组织:高级任务表征的证据。
Psychol Res. 2018 Jul;82(4):759-770. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0851-0. Epub 2017 Mar 11.