Bourion-Bédès Stéphanie, Schwan Raymund, Laprevote Vincent, Bédès Alex, Bonnet Jean-Louis, Baumann Cédric
Service Médico Psychologique Régional, 57 073, Metz, France.
CSAPA (Health Care Centre of Accompaniment and Prevention in Addictology), University Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Oct 24;13:172. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0365-7.
Differential Item Functioning (DIF) is investigated to ensure that each item displays a consistent pattern of responses irrespective of the characteristics of the respondents. Assessing DIF helps to understand the nature of instruments, to assess the quality of a measure and to interpret results. This study aimed to examine whether the items of the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) and Short-Form 12 (SF-12) exhibit DIF.
A total of 124 outpatients diagnosed with substance dependence participated in a cross-sectional, multicenter study. In addition to the Q-LES-Q-SF and SF-12 results, demographic data such as age, sex, type of substance dependence and education level were collected. Rasch analysis was conducted (using RUMM2020 software) to assess DIF of the Q-LES-Q-SF and SF-12 items.
For SF-12, significant age-related uniform DIF was found in two of the 12 items, and sex-related DIF was found in one of the 12 items. All of the observed DIF effects in SF-12 were found among the mental health items. Three items showed DIF on the Q-LES-Q-SF; however, the impact of DIF item on the delta score calculation for the comparisons of self-reported health status between the groups was minimal in the SF-12 and small in the Q-LES-Q-SF.
These results indicated that no major measurement bias affects the validity of the self-reported health status assessed using the Q-LES-Q-SF or SF-12. Thus, these questionnaires are largely robust measures of self-reported health status among substance users.
对项目功能差异(DIF)进行研究,以确保每个项目无论受访者的特征如何,都能呈现出一致的反应模式。评估项目功能差异有助于了解工具的性质、评估测量的质量并解释结果。本研究旨在检验生活质量享受与满意度问卷简表(Q-LES-Q-SF)和简明健康状况调查简表(SF-12)的项目是否存在项目功能差异。
共有124名被诊断为物质依赖的门诊患者参与了一项横断面多中心研究。除了Q-LES-Q-SF和SF-12的结果外,还收集了年龄、性别、物质依赖类型和教育水平等人口统计学数据。使用RUMM2020软件进行拉施分析,以评估Q-LES-Q-SF和SF-12项目的项目功能差异。
对于SF-12,在12个项目中的2个项目中发现了与年龄相关的显著一致项目功能差异,在12个项目中的1个项目中发现了与性别相关的项目功能差异。在SF-12中观察到的所有项目功能差异效应都出现在心理健康项目中。Q-LES-Q-SF上有3个项目显示出项目功能差异;然而,在SF-12中,项目功能差异项目对组间自我报告健康状况比较的增量得分计算的影响最小,在Q-LES-Q-SF中影响较小。
这些结果表明,没有重大测量偏差影响使用Q-LES-Q-SF或SF-12评估的自我报告健康状况的有效性。因此,这些问卷在很大程度上是物质使用者自我报告健康状况的可靠测量工具。