Dawes Christopher T, Settle Jaime E, Loewen Peter John, McGue Matt, Iacono William G
Department of Politics, New York University, New York, NY, USA
Government Department, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA, USA.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Dec 5;370(1683):20150015. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0015.
Civic engagement is a classic example of a collective action problem: while civic participation improves life in the community as a whole, it is individually costly and thus there is an incentive to free ride on the actions of others. Yet, we observe significant inter-individual variation in the degree to which people are in fact civically engaged. Early accounts reconciling the theoretical prediction with empirical reality focused either on variation in individuals' material resources or their attitudes, but recent work has turned to genetic differences between individuals. We show an underlying genetic contribution to an index of civic engagement (0.41), as well as for the individual acts of engagement of volunteering for community or public service activities (0.33), regularly contributing to charitable causes (0.28) and voting in elections (0.27). There are closer genetic relationships between donating and the other two activities; volunteering and voting are not genetically correlated. Further, we show that most of the correlation between civic engagement and both positive emotionality and verbal IQ can be attributed to genes that affect both traits. These results enrich our understanding of the way in which genetic variation may influence the wide range of collective action problems that individuals face in modern community life.
虽然公民参与能改善整个社区的生活,但这对个人来说成本高昂,因此存在搭他人行动便车的动机。然而,我们观察到人们在实际公民参与程度上存在显著的个体差异。早期将理论预测与实证现实相协调的解释要么侧重于个体物质资源的差异,要么侧重于他们的态度,但最近的研究转向了个体之间的基因差异。我们发现公民参与指数存在潜在的遗传贡献(0.41),以及参与社区或公共服务活动的志愿行为(0.33)、定期为慈善事业捐款(0.28)和参加选举投票(0.27)等个体行为也存在遗传贡献。捐款与其他两项活动之间存在更紧密的遗传关系;志愿行为和投票在基因上没有相关性。此外,我们表明公民参与与积极情绪和语言智商之间的大部分相关性可归因于影响这两种特质的基因。这些结果丰富了我们对基因变异可能影响个体在现代社区生活中面临的广泛集体行动问题的方式的理解。