von Rueden Chris, Gavrilets Sergey, Glowacki Luke
Jepson School of Leadership Studies, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA 23173, USA
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA Department of Mathematics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Dec 5;370(1683):20150002. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0002.
Models of collective action infrequently account for differences across individuals beyond a limited set of strategies, ignoring variation in endowment (e.g. physical condition, wealth, knowledge, personality, support), individual costs of effort, or expected gains from cooperation. However, behavioural research indicates these inter-individual differences can have significant effects on the dynamics of collective action. The papers contributed to this theme issue evaluate how individual differences affect the propensity to cooperate, and how they can catalyse others' likelihood of cooperation (e.g. via leadership). Many of the papers emphasize the relationship between individual decisions and socio-ecological context, particularly the effect of group size. All together, the papers in this theme issue provide a more complete picture of collective action, by embracing the reality of inter-individual variation and its multiple roles in the success or failure of collective action.
集体行动模型很少考虑除了有限的一系列策略之外个体之间的差异,忽略禀赋差异(如身体状况、财富、知识、个性、支持)、个体努力成本或合作预期收益。然而,行为研究表明,这些个体间差异会对集体行动的动态产生重大影响。本专题的论文评估了个体差异如何影响合作倾向,以及它们如何催化他人的合作可能性(如通过领导力)。许多论文强调个体决策与社会生态背景之间的关系,尤其是群体规模的影响。总体而言,本专题的论文通过接受个体间差异的现实及其在集体行动成败中的多重作用,提供了一幅更完整的集体行动图景。