Lee Kwang Jin, Oh You Chang, Cho Won Kyung, Ma Jin Yeul
Korean Institute of Oriental Medicine (KIOM), KM Application Center, 70 Cheomdan-ro, Dong-gu, Daegu 701-300, Republic of Korea.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:165457. doi: 10.1155/2015/165457. Epub 2015 Oct 4.
This study investigated the antioxidant activity of one hundred kinds of pure chemical compounds found within a number of natural substances and oriental medicinal herbs (OMH). Three different methods were used to evaluate the antioxidant activity of DPPH radical-scavenging activity, ABTS radical-scavenging activity, and online screening HPLC-ABTS assays. The results indicated that 17 compounds exhibited better inhibitory activity against ABTS radical than DPPH radical. The IC50 rate of a more practical substance is determined, and the ABTS assay IC50 values of gallic acid hydrate, (+)-catechin hydrate, caffeic acid, rutin hydrate, hyperoside, quercetin, and kaempferol compounds were 1.03 ± 0.25, 3.12 ± 0.51, 1.59 ± 0.06, 4.68 ± 1.24, 3.54 ± 0.39, 1.89 ± 0.33, and 3.70 ± 0.15 μg/mL, respectively. The ABTS assay is more sensitive to identifying the antioxidant activity since it has faster reaction kinetics and a heightened response to antioxidants. In addition, there was a very small margin of error between the results of the offline-ABTS assay and those of the online screening HPLC-ABTS assay. We also evaluated the effects of 17 compounds on the NO secretion in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells and also investigated the cytotoxicity of 17 compounds using a cell counting kit (CCK) in order to determine the optimal concentration that would provide an effective anti-inflammatory action with minimum toxicity. These results will be compiled into a database, and this method can be a powerful preselection tool for compounds intended to be studied for their potential bioactivity and antioxidant activity related to their radical-scavenging capacity.
本研究调查了多种天然物质和东方草药(OMH)中发现的100种纯化合物的抗氧化活性。采用三种不同方法评估抗氧化活性,即DPPH自由基清除活性、ABTS自由基清除活性和在线筛选HPLC-ABTS测定法。结果表明,17种化合物对ABTS自由基的抑制活性优于对DPPH自由基的抑制活性。测定了一种更具实用性物质的IC50值,水合没食子酸、(+)-水合儿茶素、咖啡酸、水合芦丁、金丝桃苷、槲皮素和山奈酚化合物的ABTS测定IC50值分别为1.03±0.25、3.12±0.51、1.59±0.06、4.68±1.24、3.54±0.39、1.89±0.33和3.70±0.15μg/mL。ABTS测定法在识别抗氧化活性方面更敏感,因为它具有更快的反应动力学和对抗氧化剂更高的响应。此外,离线ABTS测定结果与在线筛选HPLC-ABTS测定结果之间的误差非常小。我们还评估了17种化合物对脂多糖刺激的RAW 264.7细胞中NO分泌的影响,并使用细胞计数试剂盒(CCK)研究了17种化合物的细胞毒性,以确定能以最小毒性提供有效抗炎作用的最佳浓度。这些结果将被汇编成一个数据库,并且这种方法可以成为一种强大的预选工具,用于筛选那些旨在研究其与自由基清除能力相关的潜在生物活性和抗氧化活性的化合物。