Suppr超能文献

辅助生殖技术(ART)后出生儿童的心理健康与发育结局:一项关于儿童性别与治疗类型的比较性前瞻性研究。

Mental health and developmental outcomes for children born after ART: a comparative prospective study on child gender and treatment type.

作者信息

Punamäki Raija-Leena, Tiitinen Aila, Lindblom Jallu, Unkila-Kallio Leila, Flykt Marjo, Vänskä Mervi, Poikkeus Piia, Tulppala Maija

机构信息

School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Department of Psychology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2016 Jan;31(1):100-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev273. Epub 2015 Oct 29.

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

Do children born after assisted reproductive techniques (ART; IVF/ICSI) display more mental health issues or social and cognitive developmental problems at 7-8 years than naturally conceived (NC) controls, and does child gender play a role?

SUMMARY ANSWER

ART children do not differ with regard to mental health or social and cognitive developmental problems when compared with controls, but some gender-specific differences do exist.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Systematic reviews have not found any evidence of delays in neurocognitive or sensorimotor development in ART children. However findings on the effect of the type of ART treatment (IVF versus ICSI) on the offspring's physical and mental development have not been uniform. Knowledge of the role of child gender in ART research is scarce.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This prospective follow-up study compares mental health and social and cognitive developmental problems between 7-8-year-old ART and NC children, controlling for the father's age, length of the parents' partnership, mother's parity, child's gestational age, and the need of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Further, within the ART group, we analysed whether the treatment type (IVF versus ICSI) and the child's gender are associated with the mental health and developmental outcomes.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: In this study, 255 singleton ART children (IVF and ICSI) were compared with 278 NC children on parent-reported internalizing and externalizing symptoms, and social (social skills and peer relations) and cognitive development (executive functioning, perception, memory, and language). Within the ART group, 164 IVF and 76 ICSI children were compared on the same outcomes. Statistics included analyses of covariates (ANCOVA) with group main effects, group and gender interaction effects, and Bonferroni post hoc tests.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

ART and NC children did not differ generally in terms of their internalizing and externalizing symptoms or in the number of social and cognitive developmental problems (Group main effects, P > 0.05), but gender-specific group differences existed. The ART boys showed lower levels of cognitive problems than the NC boys, whereas ART girls showed higher levels of cognitive problems than the NC girls (Group × Gender-interaction effects with Bonferroni post hoc tests on mother-reports, P < 0.01). Further, unlike in the NC group, where boys showed more externalizing symptoms and social and cognitive developmental problems than girls (Group × Gender-interaction effects with Bonferroni post hoc tests for both parents' reports, P < 0.05), gender differences were not found in the ART group. Within the ART group, IVF and ICSI children did not differ in terms of mental health or developmental outcomes, and no significant gender differences emerged.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The information on children's mental health and development was based on parental reports only. The dropout rate between the child's first year and the school age assessments was very high for fathers (57.4%) and substantial for mothers (30.1%), and the participating group was biased for older age of both parents and for better education of the fathers.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The findings indicate the importance of considering child gender in learning about multiple developmental outcomes among children born after ART.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was supported by the Academy of Finland (#11232276), the Emil Aaltonen Foundation, The Family Federation of Finland, Helsinki University Central Hospital Research Funds, and the National Graduate School of Psychology. None of authors has any competing interests to declare.

摘要

研究问题

与自然受孕(NC)的对照组相比,辅助生殖技术(ART;体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射)出生的儿童在7至8岁时是否表现出更多的心理健康问题或社会和认知发展问题,儿童性别是否起作用?

总结答案

与对照组相比,ART儿童在心理健康或社会和认知发展问题方面没有差异,但确实存在一些性别特异性差异。

已知信息

系统评价未发现ART儿童存在神经认知或感觉运动发育延迟的证据。然而,关于ART治疗类型(体外受精与卵胞浆内单精子注射)对后代身心发育影响的研究结果并不一致。关于儿童性别在ART研究中的作用的了解很少。

研究设计、规模、持续时间:这项前瞻性随访研究比较了7至8岁的ART儿童和NC儿童的心理健康以及社会和认知发展问题,同时控制了父亲年龄、父母关系时长、母亲生育次数、儿童胎龄以及新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的需求。此外,在ART组中,我们分析了治疗类型(体外受精与卵胞浆内单精子注射)和儿童性别是否与心理健康和发育结果相关。

参与者/材料、设置、方法:在本研究中,将255名单胎ART儿童(体外受精和卵胞浆内单精子注射)与278名NC儿童在父母报告的内化和外化症状、社会(社交技能和同伴关系)和认知发展(执行功能、感知、记忆和语言)方面进行了比较。在ART组中,对164名体外受精儿童和76名卵胞浆内单精子注射儿童在相同结果方面进行了比较。统计分析包括协方差分析(ANCOVA),分析组主效应、组与性别交互效应以及Bonferroni事后检验。

主要结果及偶然性的作用

ART儿童和NC儿童在总体内化和外化症状或社会和认知发展问题数量方面没有差异(组主效应,P>0.05),但存在性别特异性组间差异。ART男孩的认知问题水平低于NC男孩,而ART女孩的认知问题水平高于NC女孩(组×性别交互效应,母亲报告的Bonferroni事后检验,P<0.01)。此外,与NC组不同,NC组中男孩比女孩表现出更多的外化症状以及社会和认知发展问题(父母双方报告的组×性别交互效应,Bonferroni事后检验,P<0.05),而在ART组中未发现性别差异。在ART组中,体外受精和卵胞浆内单精子注射儿童在心理健康或发育结果方面没有差异,也未出现显著的性别差异。

局限性、谨慎理由:关于儿童心理健康和发育的信息仅基于父母报告。从儿童一岁到学龄期评估期间,父亲的失访率非常高(57.4%),母亲的失访率也相当高(30.1%),参与组在父母年龄较大以及父亲受教育程度较高方面存在偏差。

研究结果的更广泛影响

研究结果表明,在了解ART出生儿童的多种发育结果时,考虑儿童性别很重要。

研究资金/利益冲突:本研究得到了芬兰科学院(#11232276)、埃米尔·阿尔托宁基金会、芬兰家庭联合会、赫尔辛基大学中心医院研究基金以及国家心理学研究生院的支持。作者均无利益冲突声明。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验