• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗中胸痛的病因——一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Causes of chest pain in primary care--a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Haasenritter Jörg, Biroga Tobias, Keunecke Christian, Becker Annette, Donner-Banzhoff Norbert, Dornieden Katharina, Stadje Rebekka, Viniol Annika, Bösner Stefan

机构信息

Jörg Haasenritter, Philipps University of Marburg, Department of General Practice/Family Medicine, Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 4, 35043 Marburg, Germany,

出版信息

Croat Med J. 2015 Oct;56(5):422-30. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2015.56.422.

DOI:10.3325/cmj.2015.56.422
PMID:26526879
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4655927/
Abstract

AIM

To investigate the frequencies of different and relevant underlying etiologies of chest pain in general practice.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed and EMBASE. Two reviewers independently rated the eligibility of publications and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. We extracted data to calculate the relative frequencies of different underlying conditions and investigated the variation across studies using forest plots, I(2), tau(2), and prediction intervals. With respect to unexplained heterogeneity, we provided qualitative syntheses instead of pooled estimates.

RESULTS

We identified 11 eligible studies comprising about 6500 patients. The overall risk of bias was rated as low in 6 studies comprising about 3900 patients. The relative frequencies of different conditions as the underlying etiologies of chest pain reported by these studies ranged from 24.5 to 49.8% (chest wall syndrome), 13.8 to 16.1% (cardiovascular diseases), 6.6 to 11.2% (stable coronary heart disease), 1.5 to 3.6% (acute coronary syndrome/myocardial infarction), 10.3 to 18.2% (respiratory diseases), 9.5 to 18.2% (psychogenic etiologies), 5.6 to 9.7% (gastrointestinal disorders), and 6.0 to 7.1% (esophageal disorders).

CONCLUSION

This information may be of practical value for general practitioners as it provides the pre-test probabilities for a range of underlying diseases and may be suitable to guide the diagnostic process.

摘要

目的

调查全科医疗中胸痛不同相关潜在病因的发生频率。

方法

我们系统检索了PubMed和EMBASE。两名评审员独立评定出版物的合格性,并评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。我们提取数据以计算不同潜在疾病的相对频率,并使用森林图、I²、τ²和预测区间研究各研究间的差异。对于无法解释的异质性,我们提供定性综合分析而非合并估计值。

结果

我们确定了11项合格研究,共纳入约6500例患者。在约3900例患者的6项研究中,总体偏倚风险被评为低。这些研究报告的作为胸痛潜在病因的不同疾病的相对频率范围为:胸壁综合征24.5%至49.8%、心血管疾病13.8%至16.1%、稳定型冠心病6.6%至11.2%、急性冠状动脉综合征/心肌梗死1.5%至3.6%、呼吸系统疾病10.3%至18.2%、心因性病因9.5%至18.2%、胃肠道疾病5.6%至9.7%、食管疾病6.0%至7.1%。

结论

该信息可能对全科医生具有实际价值,因为它提供了一系列潜在疾病的检验前概率,可能适用于指导诊断过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d1/4655927/4b3aeb70e1ba/CroatMedJ_56_0422-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d1/4655927/4b3aeb70e1ba/CroatMedJ_56_0422-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d1/4655927/4b3aeb70e1ba/CroatMedJ_56_0422-F1.jpg

相似文献

1
Causes of chest pain in primary care--a systematic review and meta-analysis.基层医疗中胸痛的病因——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Croat Med J. 2015 Oct;56(5):422-30. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2015.56.422.
2
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
3
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
4
Effects of a gluten-reduced or gluten-free diet for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.减少或无麸质饮食对心血管疾病一级预防的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 24;2(2):CD013556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013556.pub2.
5
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
6
The association between ethnicity and delay in seeking medical care for chest pain: a systematic review.种族与胸痛就医延迟之间的关联:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Jul;14(7):208-35. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003012.
7
Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19.用于 COVID-19 诊断的胸部影像学检查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 16;5(5):CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub5.
8
123I-MIBG scintigraphy and 18F-FDG-PET imaging for diagnosing neuroblastoma.用于诊断神经母细胞瘤的123I-间碘苄胍闪烁扫描术和18F-氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层显像
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 29;2015(9):CD009263. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009263.pub2.
9
Clinician-targeted interventions to influence antibiotic prescribing behaviour for acute respiratory infections in primary care: an overview of systematic reviews.针对临床医生的干预措施对基层医疗中急性呼吸道感染抗生素处方行为的影响:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 7;9(9):CD012252. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012252.pub2.
10
Clinical judgement by primary care physicians for the diagnosis of all-cause dementia or cognitive impairment in symptomatic people.初级保健医生对有症状人群进行全因痴呆或认知障碍诊断的临床判断。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 16;6(6):CD012558. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012558.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Adequately identifying low-risk chest pain in emergency primary care: evaluating the performance of preHEAR(T) based on two European cohorts.在急诊初级护理中充分识别低风险胸痛:基于两个欧洲队列评估preHEAR(T)的性能。
Open Heart. 2025 Jul 27;12(2):e003362. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2025-003362.
2
Coronary computed tomography angiography in primary care patients with chest pain or dyspnea - a cross-sectional study.针对伴有胸痛或呼吸困难的基层医疗患者的冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术——一项横断面研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 May 20;26(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02877-z.
3
Quality of undifferentiated chest pain evaluation and diagnosis guidelines: a systematic review and critical appraisal.

本文引用的文献

1
Studies of the symptom abdominal pain--a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹痛症状的研究——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Fam Pract. 2014 Oct;31(5):517-29. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmu036. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
2
The comprehensive diagnostic study is suggested as a design to model the diagnostic process.建议采用综合诊断研究设计来模拟诊断过程。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Feb;67(2):124-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.05.019. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
3
Does the patient with chest pain have a coronary heart disease? Diagnostic value of single symptoms and signs--a meta-analysis.
未分化型胸痛评估与诊断指南的质量:一项系统评价与批判性评估
JRSM Open. 2024 Nov 20;15(11):20542704241288955. doi: 10.1177/20542704241288955. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
To Be, or Not to Be … Pectoral Angina? The Pain Is the Same, but the Etiology Is Different-A Case Report.是或不是……胸肌性心绞痛?疼痛相同,但病因不同——一例病例报告。
Life (Basel). 2024 Aug 26;14(9):1066. doi: 10.3390/life14091066.
5
Chest Pain in Primary Care: A Systematic Review of Risk Stratification Tools to Rule Out Acute Coronary Syndrome.基层医疗中的胸痛:排除急性冠状动脉综合征的风险分层工具的系统评价。
Ann Fam Med. 2024 Sep-Oct;22(5):426-436. doi: 10.1370/afm.3141.
6
PFAS and their association with the increased risk of cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women.全氟和多氟烷基物质及其与绝经后妇女心血管疾病风险增加的关联。
Toxicol Sci. 2024 Aug 1;200(2):312-323. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfae065.
7
Development and implementation of a treatment pathway to reduce coronary angiograms - lessons from a failure.制定和实施减少冠状动脉造影的治疗路径 - 从失败中吸取的教训。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 25;24(1):527. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10904-5.
8
Dissecting the mediating and moderating effects of depression on the associations between traits and coronary artery disease: A two-step Mendelian randomization and phenome-wide interaction study.剖析抑郁症对特质与冠状动脉疾病之间关联的中介和调节作用:一项两步孟德尔随机化和全表型交互作用研究。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2023 Oct-Dec;23(4):100394. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2023.100394. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
9
The long-term effects of the Covid-19 infection on cardiac symptoms.新冠病毒感染对心脏症状的长期影响。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Jun 6;23(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03322-8.
10
Determining cardiovascular risk in patients with unattributed chest pain in UK primary care: an electronic health record study.在英国初级保健中对原因不明胸痛患者进行心血管风险评估:一项电子健康记录研究。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2023 Aug 21;30(11):1151-1161. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad055.
胸痛患者是否患有冠心病?单一症状和体征的诊断价值——一项荟萃分析。
Croat Med J. 2012 Oct;53(5):432-41. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2012.53.432.
4
Ruling out coronary heart disease in primary care: external validation of a clinical prediction rule.基层医疗中心排除冠心病:临床预测规则的外部验证。
Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Jun;62(599):e415-21. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X649106.
5
Diagnosis in General Practice. Using probabilistic reasoning.全科医疗中的诊断。运用概率推理。
BMJ. 2009 Nov 3;339:b3823. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3823.
6
Chest pain in primary care: epidemiology and pre-work-up probabilities.基层医疗中的胸痛:流行病学和初步检查概率。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2009;15(3):141-6. doi: 10.3109/13814780903329528.
7
Why does the general practitioner refer patients with chest pain not-urgently to the specialist or urgently to the emergency department? Influence of the certainty of the initial diagnosis.为什么全科医生会将胸痛患者非紧急地转诊给专科医生,或紧急转诊至急诊科?初始诊断确定性的影响。
Acta Cardiol. 2009 Apr;64(2):259-65. doi: 10.2143/AC.64.2.2036147.
8
A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis.随机效应荟萃分析的重新评估。
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2009 Jan;172(1):137-159. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00552.x.
9
Diagnostic test accuracy may vary with prevalence: implications for evidence-based diagnosis.诊断试验准确性可能随患病率而变化:对循证诊断的启示
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Jan;62(1):5-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.04.007. Epub 2008 Sep 7.
10
The accuracy of general practitioners' clinical assessment of chest pain patients.全科医生对胸痛患者临床评估的准确性。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2008;14(2):50-5. doi: 10.1080/13814780802342622.