Narayanan Sreelatha S, Bhatia Triptish, Velligan Dawn I, Nimgaonkar Vishwajit L, Deshpande Smita N
Indo-US Projects, Department of Psychiatry, PGIMER, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Division of Schizophrenia and Related Disorders, School of Medicine (Psychiatry),University of Texas Health Sciences Centre, San Antonio, TX, United States.
Schizophr Res. 2015 Dec;169(1-3):165-168. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.10.025. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
Cognitive functions are important prognostic factors for schizophrenia (SZ), while ability to perform activities of daily living are important measures of functional capacity. The relationship between cognition and functional capacity has not been tested extensively in India.
To compare persons with SZ with controls on measures of cognition and functional capacity, and evaluate correlations between cognitive performance and functional capacity.
Schizophrenia outpatients and controls without psychiatric illness (DSM IV) who completed the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery and Functional Assessment Battery comprised of two tests from University of California San Diego (UCSD) Performance Based Skill Assessment (UPSA), one Test of Adaptive Behavior in Schizophrenia (TABS) and one test from University of California San Diego Performance Based Skill Assessment Brief edition (UPSA-B). Cognitive and functional domains were examined using regression analyses, with relevant covariates.
Cases (N=51) though younger, were more educated than controls (N=41). Adjusting for education, controls performed better than cases in 3/7 cognitive and 4/5 domains of functional capacity but similarly in 'household management'. Among both cases and controls, cognitive measures of verbal learning and speed of processing overlapped with functional capacity (3 domains). Working memory was associated with one functional domain.
Consistent with other studies, Indian patients with schizophrenia performed worse than controls on several domains of cognition and functional capacity; these domains were correlated. Speed of processing and verbal learning are most frequently associated with functional capacity indices and should be targeted to improve skills of daily living among persons with SZ.
认知功能是精神分裂症(SZ)重要的预后因素,而日常生活活动能力是功能能力的重要衡量指标。在印度,认知与功能能力之间的关系尚未得到广泛研究。
比较精神分裂症患者与对照组在认知和功能能力指标上的差异,并评估认知表现与功能能力之间的相关性。
精神分裂症门诊患者和无精神疾病(DSM-IV)的对照组完成了MATRICS共识认知成套测验以及功能评估成套测验,后者由加利福尼亚大学圣地亚哥分校(UCSD)基于表现的技能评估(UPSA)中的两项测试、一项精神分裂症适应性行为测试(TABS)以及加利福尼亚大学圣地亚哥分校基于表现的技能评估简版(UPSA-B)中的一项测试组成。使用回归分析及相关协变量对认知和功能领域进行检查。
病例组(N = 51)虽然年龄较小,但受教育程度高于对照组(N = 41)。在调整教育因素后,对照组在7项认知指标中的3项以及5项功能能力领域中的4项表现优于病例组,但在“家务管理”方面表现相似。在病例组和对照组中,言语学习和加工速度的认知指标与功能能力(3个领域)存在重叠。工作记忆与一个功能领域相关。
与其他研究一致,印度精神分裂症患者在认知和功能能力的几个领域表现比对照组差;这些领域存在相关性。加工速度和言语学习最常与功能能力指标相关,应针对这些方面来提高精神分裂症患者的日常生活技能。