• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定义精神分裂症和情感障碍的认知和功能特征。

Defining cognitive and functional profiles in schizophrenia and affective disorders.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 31;20(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-2459-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12888-020-2459-y
PMID:32005199
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6995055/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neurocognitive dysfunction is a common symptom of various major psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia, major depressive disorder (MDD), and bipolar I disorder (BD). In this study, we investigated whether cognitive profiles and daily skill functioning could effectively differentiate between patients with schizophrenia, MDD, and BD.

METHOD

In this cross-sectional study, we recruited a total of 63 patients with schizophrenia, 55 patients with MDD, 43 patients with BD, and 92 healthy control subjects. We evaluated participants' cognitive functions and functional capacity using the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) and the UCSD Performance-based Skills Assessment, Brief Version (UPSA-B), respectively. Multivariate analysis of covariance was then adopted to determine inter-group differences in BACS and UPSA-B performance.

RESULTS

The BACS was capable of differentiating patients with a major psychiatric disorder (schizophrenia, MDD, and BD) from healthy subjects. Furthermore, schizophrenia patients had poorer motor speed performance than patients with affective disorders. The UPSA-B, particularly the financial portion, was able to distinguish schizophrenia patients from other groups. However, we did not observe any differences in UPSA-B performance between patients with mood disorders and the healthy controls. No significant difference between patients with BD and those with MDD were observed in either cognitive function or in functional capacity. The performances of the BACS and the UPSA-B were positively correlated, particularly in the MDD group.

CONCLUSION

Considering overall performance, the BACS and the UPSA-B characterize different endophenotyping profiles in the aforementioned four participant groups. Therefore, the results support the need for comprehensive assessments that target both cognitive function and functional capacity for patients with major psychiatric disorders.

摘要

背景

神经认知功能障碍是各种主要精神疾病的常见症状,包括精神分裂症、重性抑郁障碍(MDD)和双相 I 障碍(BD)。在本研究中,我们调查了认知特征和日常技能功能是否能有效地将精神分裂症、MDD 和 BD 患者区分开来。

方法

在这项横断面研究中,我们共招募了 63 名精神分裂症患者、55 名 MDD 患者、43 名 BD 患者和 92 名健康对照组。我们分别使用Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia(BACS)和UCSD Performance-based Skills Assessment,Brief Version(UPSA-B)评估参与者的认知功能和功能能力。然后,采用多元协方差分析确定 BACS 和 UPSA-B 表现的组间差异。

结果

BACS 能够将患有主要精神障碍(精神分裂症、MDD 和 BD)的患者与健康受试者区分开来。此外,精神分裂症患者的运动速度表现比情感障碍患者差。UPSA-B,特别是财务部分,能够将精神分裂症患者与其他组区分开来。然而,我们没有观察到情绪障碍患者与健康对照组在 UPSA-B 表现上的差异。BD 和 MDD 患者之间在认知功能或功能能力方面没有显著差异。BACS 和 UPSA-B 的表现呈正相关,尤其是在 MDD 组。

结论

考虑到整体表现,BACS 和 UPSA-B 描述了上述四组参与者不同的表型特征。因此,结果支持需要对患有主要精神疾病的患者进行全面的认知功能和功能能力评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bb8/6995055/66eae1e3b417/12888_2020_2459_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bb8/6995055/9b179fe00f86/12888_2020_2459_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bb8/6995055/66eae1e3b417/12888_2020_2459_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bb8/6995055/9b179fe00f86/12888_2020_2459_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bb8/6995055/66eae1e3b417/12888_2020_2459_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Defining cognitive and functional profiles in schizophrenia and affective disorders.定义精神分裂症和情感障碍的认知和功能特征。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 31;20(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-2459-y.
2
Comparison of neurocognitive function in major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia in later life: A cross-sectional study of euthymic or remitted, non-demented patients using the Japanese version of the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS-J).老年期单相抑郁障碍、双相障碍和精神分裂症患者神经认知功能的比较:使用日本版简明精神分裂症认知评估量表(BACS-J)对非痴呆、病情缓解或稳定的患者进行的横断面研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Aug;254:205-210. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.04.058. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
3
Could schizoaffective disorder, schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder be distinguishable using cognitive profiles?分裂情感性障碍、精神分裂症和双相 I 障碍能否通过认知特征来区分?
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Aug;266:79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.05.062. Epub 2018 May 24.
4
Relationship of the Brief UCSD Performance-based Skills Assessment (UPSA-B) to multiple indicators of functioning in people with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.简明 UCSD 表现技能评估(UPSA-B)与精神分裂症和双相情感障碍患者多项功能指标的关系。
Bipolar Disord. 2010 Feb;12(1):45-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2009.00787.x.
5
[Interest of a new instrument to assess cognition in schizophrenia: The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)].[一种用于评估精神分裂症认知功能的新工具的价值:精神分裂症认知功能简短评估量表(BACS)]
Encephale. 2008 Dec;34(6):557-62. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
6
Investigation of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) as a cognitive screener in severe mental illness.蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)作为严重精神疾病认知筛查工具的研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Dec 15;220(1-2):664-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.07.078. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
7
The relationship of the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) to functional capacity and real-world functional outcome.精神分裂症认知简短评估(BACS)与功能能力及现实世界功能结局的关系。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2006 Feb;28(2):260-9. doi: 10.1080/13803390500360539.
8
Determination of a clinically important difference and definition of a responder threshold for the UCSD performance-based skills assessment (UPSA) in patients with major depressive disorder.确定重度抑郁症患者中基于加州大学圣地亚哥分校表现的技能评估(UPSA)的临床重要差异及反应者阈值定义。
J Affect Disord. 2017 Apr 15;213:105-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.02.014. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
9
UPSA-M: Feasibility and initial validity of a mobile application of the UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment.UPSA-M:加州大学圣地亚哥分校基于表现的技能评估移动应用程序的可行性和初步效度
Schizophr Res. 2015 May;164(1-3):187-92. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.02.014. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
10
An optimal combination of MCCB and CANTAB to assess functional capacity in older individuals with schizophrenia.用塑模黏土认知评估电池(MCCB)和剑桥神经心理测试自动化成套系统(CANTAB)的最佳组合来评估老年精神分裂症患者的功能能力。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;31(10):1116-23. doi: 10.1002/gps.4547. Epub 2016 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Equivalence verification of the electronic version of the Chinese Brief Cognitive Test (C-BCT): Focus on Chinese schizophrenia populations.中文版简易认知测试(C-BCT)电子版的等效性验证:聚焦中国精神分裂症人群。
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2025 Aug 31;42:100386. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2025.100386. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
Efficacy of Virtual Reality-Based Interventions on Cognitive Function in Patients With Neuropsychiatric Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.基于虚拟现实的干预措施对神经精神疾病患者认知功能的疗效:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
JMIR Serious Games. 2025 May 8;13:e67501. doi: 10.2196/67501.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of the University of California San Diego Performance-based Skills Assessment (UPSA) in major depressive disorder: Replication and extension of initial findings.加利福尼亚大学圣地亚哥分校基于表现的技能评估(UPSA)在重度抑郁症中的验证:初始发现的复制和扩展。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Feb 15;245:508-516. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.034. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
2
Estimate dynamic changes of dysfunction and lifelong spent for psychiatric care needs in patients with schizophrenia.评估精神分裂症患者的功能障碍和精神卫生保健需求终身花费的动态变化。
Eur Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;54:65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.07.009. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
3
Differential patterns of executive dysfunction across depressive phenotype in schizophrenia and major depressive disorder.
精神分裂症和重度抑郁症中不同抑郁表型的执行功能障碍差异模式。
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2025 Apr 27. doi: 10.1007/s00702-025-02929-9.
4
Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia-Japanese Version Composite Score: A Single-Center Preliminary Study.精神分裂症认知功能简短评估-日语版综合评分的最小临床重要差异:单中心初步研究
Yonago Acta Med. 2025 Jan 25;68(1):45-50. doi: 10.33160/yam.2025.02.005. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Assessment of Cognitive Functions Among Remitted Patients of Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder: A Comparative Study.精神分裂症和双相情感障碍缓解期患者认知功能评估:一项比较研究。
Cureus. 2024 Jul 11;16(7):e64296. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64296. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
Comparison of cognitive performance in first-episode drug-naïve schizophrenia, bipolar II disorder, and major depressive disorder patients after treatment.比较初发未用药的精神分裂症、双相情感障碍 II 型和重性抑郁障碍患者治疗后的认知表现。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 11;24(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05897-8.
7
The Chinese Version of the Compensatory ADHD Behaviors Scale (CABS): A Study on Reliability, Validity, and Clinical Utility.《代偿性注意缺陷多动障碍行为量表》(CABS)中文版:信效度及临床效用研究
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2024 May 14;20:1025-1040. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S463974. eCollection 2024.
8
Methods to Identify Cognitive Alterations from Animals to Humans: A Translational Approach.从动物到人类认知改变的识别方法:一种转化方法。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Apr 21;24(8):7653. doi: 10.3390/ijms24087653.
9
Investigation of social and cognitive predictors in non-transition ultra-high-risk' individuals for psychosis using spiking neural networks.使用脉冲神经网络对非转换型“超高风险”精神病个体的社会和认知预测因素进行调查。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2023 Feb 15;9(1):10. doi: 10.1038/s41537-023-00335-2.
10
Validation of the Chinese Version of the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale.《精神分裂症认知评定量表》中文版的效度验证
Psychiatry Investig. 2022 Jul;19(7):511-518. doi: 10.30773/pi.2021.0322. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
Molecular targets of atypical antipsychotics: From mechanism of action to clinical differences.
非典型抗精神病药物的分子靶点:从作用机制到临床差异。
Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Dec;192:20-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.06.012. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
4
A systematic review of a functional assessment Tool: UCSD Performance-based skill assessment (UPSA).一项功能评估工具的系统评价:加州大学圣地亚哥分校基于表现的技能评估(UPSA)。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Sep;267:12-18. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 May 18.
5
Could schizoaffective disorder, schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder be distinguishable using cognitive profiles?分裂情感性障碍、精神分裂症和双相 I 障碍能否通过认知特征来区分?
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Aug;266:79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.05.062. Epub 2018 May 24.
6
Neuropsychological predictors of performance-based measures of functional capacity and social skills in individuals with severe mental illness.神经心理学预测严重精神疾病个体基于表现的功能能力和社交技能测量指标。
J Psychiatr Res. 2018 Jul;102:201-206. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.04.011. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
7
Montreal Cognitive Assessment as a screening instrument for cognitive impairments in schizophrenia.蒙特利尔认知评估作为精神分裂症认知障碍的筛查工具。
Schizophr Res. 2018 Sep;199:58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
8
Differentiating bipolar disorders from unipolar depression by applying the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Affective Disorders.应用情感障碍认知简要评估方法区分双相情感障碍和单相抑郁。
Psychol Med. 2018 Apr;48(6):929-938. doi: 10.1017/S003329171700229X. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
9
Declining Clinical Course of Psychotic Disorders Over the Two Decades Following First Hospitalization: Evidence From the Suffolk County Mental Health Project.首次住院后二十年里精神障碍的临床病程衰退:来自萨福克郡心理健康项目的证据。
Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Nov 1;174(11):1064-1074. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16101191. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
10
Cognitive insight and functional outcome in schizophrenia; a multi-center collaborative study with the specific level of functioning scale-Japanese version.精神分裂症的认知洞察力与功能结局;一项使用特定功能水平量表 - 日文版的多中心协作研究
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2016 Sep 28;6:9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2016.08.001. eCollection 2016 Dec.