Laparra Valero, Malo Jesús
Image Processing Lab, Universitat de València València, Spain.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Oct 13;9:557. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00557. eCollection 2015.
When adapted to a particular scenery our senses may fool us: colors are misinterpreted, certain spatial patterns seem to fade out, and static objects appear to move in reverse. A mere empirical description of the mechanisms tuned to color, texture, and motion may tell us where these visual illusions come from. However, such empirical models of gain control do not explain why these mechanisms work in this apparently dysfunctional manner. Current normative explanations of aftereffects based on scene statistics derive gain changes by (1) invoking decorrelation and linear manifold matching/equalization, or (2) using nonlinear divisive normalization obtained from parametric scene models. These principled approaches have different drawbacks: the first is not compatible with the known saturation nonlinearities in the sensors and it cannot fully accomplish information maximization due to its linear nature. In the second, gain change is almost determined a priori by the assumed parametric image model linked to divisive normalization. In this study we show that both the response changes that lead to aftereffects and the nonlinear behavior can be simultaneously derived from a single statistical framework: the Sequential Principal Curves Analysis (SPCA). As opposed to mechanistic models, SPCA is not intended to describe how physiological sensors work, but it is focused on explaining why they behave as they do. Nonparametric SPCA has two key advantages as a normative model of adaptation: (i) it is better than linear techniques as it is a flexible equalization that can be tuned for more sensible criteria other than plain decorrelation (either full information maximization or error minimization); and (ii) it makes no a priori functional assumption regarding the nonlinearity, so the saturations emerge directly from the scene data and the goal (and not from the assumed function). It turns out that the optimal responses derived from these more sensible criteria and SPCA are consistent with dysfunctional behaviors such as aftereffects.
当我们的感官适应了特定的场景时,可能会欺骗我们:颜色被误解,某些空间模式似乎消失了,静止的物体似乎在反向移动。对调节颜色、纹理和运动的机制进行纯粹的经验性描述,可能会告诉我们这些视觉错觉的来源。然而,这种增益控制的经验性模型并不能解释为什么这些机制会以这种明显不正常的方式起作用。当前基于场景统计的后效规范解释通过以下方式得出增益变化:(1) 调用去相关和线性流形匹配/均衡,或 (2) 使用从参数化场景模型获得的非线性除法归一化。这些有原则的方法有不同的缺点:第一种方法与传感器中已知的饱和度非线性不兼容,并且由于其线性性质,它不能完全实现信息最大化。在第二种方法中,增益变化几乎由与除法归一化相关的假设参数图像模型先验确定。在本研究中,我们表明导致后效的响应变化和非线性行为都可以从一个单一的统计框架中同时推导出来:顺序主曲线分析(SPCA)。与机械模型不同,SPCA 并非旨在描述生理传感器如何工作,而是专注于解释它们为何如此表现。作为一种适应性规范模型,非参数 SPCA 有两个关键优势:(i) 它比线性技术更好,因为它是一种灵活的均衡,可以针对除了简单去相关之外的更合理标准进行调整(要么是完全信息最大化,要么是误差最小化);(ii) 它对非线性没有先验功能假设,因此饱和度直接从场景数据和目标中出现(而不是从假设的函数中出现)。事实证明,从这些更合理的标准和 SPCA 得出的最优响应与诸如后效等功能失调行为是一致的。