Mörstedt Beatrice, Corbisiero Salvatore, Bitto Hannes, Stieglitz Rolf-Dieter
Department of Psychology, Div. of Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
University of Basel Psychiatric Clinics, Basel, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 3;10(11):e0141342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141342. eCollection 2015.
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a severe mental illness, associated with major impairment and a high comorbidity rate. Particularly undiagnosed ADHD in adulthood has serious consequences. Thus, a valid diagnosis is important. In adulthood, the diagnostic process for ADHD is complicated: symptoms may overlap with comorbid disorders, and the onset and progression of the disorder must be reconstructed retrospectively. Guidelines for the diagnostic process recommend the inclusion of additional informant ratings. Research into the relation between self- and informant ratings shows extremely heterogeneous results. The levels of agreement range from low to high. The focus of this study is the concordance and differences between self- and informant ratings on ADHD symptoms and impairments. In this regard, two possible influencing factors (gender and relationship type) are also examined. 114 people participated in this study, 77 with an ADHD diagnosis and 37 without a diagnosis. For all participants, either parents or partners also rated ADHD symptoms and impairments. Small to moderate concordance was found between self- and informant ratings, with females being slightly more concordant than males, particularly for ratings of problems with self-concept. Examination of the consistency within a particular perspective showed that people with ADHD seemed to be unaware of the causal relation between ADHD symptoms and their impairments. A close investigation found almost no influence of gender and relationship type on differences within perspectives. Based on these results, the implications for the diagnostic process are that additional informant information is clearly necessary and helpful.
注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)是一种严重的精神疾病,伴有严重损害和高共病率。尤其是成年期未被诊断出的ADHD会产生严重后果。因此,进行有效的诊断很重要。在成年期,ADHD的诊断过程很复杂:症状可能与共病疾病重叠,而且该疾病的发病和进展必须通过回顾性方式来重建。诊断过程指南建议纳入额外的知情者评定。对自我评定与知情者评定之间关系的研究显示出极其不同的结果。一致程度从低到高不等。本研究的重点是ADHD症状及损害的自我评定与知情者评定之间的一致性和差异。在这方面,还考察了两个可能的影响因素(性别和关系类型)。114人参与了本研究,其中77人被诊断为患有ADHD,37人未被诊断出患有ADHD。对于所有参与者,其父母或伴侣也对ADHD症状及损害进行了评定。自我评定与知情者评定之间发现了小到中等程度的一致性,女性的一致性略高于男性,尤其是在自我概念问题的评定方面。在特定视角内对一致性的考察表明,患有ADHD的人似乎没有意识到ADHD症状与其损害之间的因果关系。深入调查发现,性别和关系类型对视角内的差异几乎没有影响。基于这些结果,对诊断过程的启示是,额外的知情者信息显然是必要且有帮助的。