García-Ramos Amador, Jaric Slobodan, Padial Paulino, Feriche Belén
Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
J Appl Biomech. 2016 Apr;32(2):178-85. doi: 10.1123/jab.2015-0162. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
This study aimed to (1) evaluate the linearity of the force-velocity relationship, as well as the reliability of maximum force (F0), maximum velocity (V0), slope (a), and maximum power (P0); (2) compare these parameters between the traditional and ballistic bench press (BP); and (3) determine the correlation of F0 with the directly measured BP 1-repetition maximum (1RM). Thirty-two men randomly performed 2 sessions of traditional BP and 2 sessions of ballistic BP during 2 consecutive weeks. Both the maximum and mean values of force and velocity were recorded when loaded by 20-70% of 1RM. All force-velocity relationships were strongly linear (r > .99). While F0 and P0 were highly reliable (ICC: 0.91-0.96, CV: 3.8-5.1%), lower reliability was observed for V0 and a (ICC: 0.49-0.81, CV: 6.6-11.8%). Trivial differences between exercises were found for F0 (ES: < 0.2), however the a was higher for the traditional BP (ES: 0.68-0.94), and V0 (ES: 1.04-1.48) and P0 (ES: 0.65-0.72) for the ballistic BP. The F0 strongly correlated with BP 1RM (r: 0.915-0.938). The force-velocity relationship is useful to assess the upper body maximal capabilities to generate force, velocity, and power.
(1)评估力-速度关系的线性,以及最大力量(F0)、最大速度(V0)、斜率(a)和最大功率(P0)的可靠性;(2)比较传统卧推和弹道式卧推(BP)之间的这些参数;(3)确定F0与直接测量的卧推1次重复最大值(1RM)之间的相关性。32名男性在连续两周内随机进行了2次传统BP训练和2次弹道式BP训练。当负荷为1RM的20%-70%时,记录力量和速度的最大值和平均值。所有力-速度关系均呈强线性(r>.99)。虽然F0和P0具有高度可靠性(组内相关系数:0.91-0.96,变异系数:3.8%-5.1%),但V0和a的可靠性较低(组内相关系数:0.49-0.81,变异系数:6.6%-11.8%)。在F0方面,两种训练之间存在微小差异(效应量:<0.2),然而,传统BP的a值更高(效应量:0.68-0.94),弹道式BP的V0(效应量:1.04-1.48)和P0(效应量:0.65-0.72)更高。F0与卧推1RM密切相关(r:0.915-0.938)。力-速度关系有助于评估上身产生力量、速度和功率的最大能力。