Shankles Peter G, Timm Andrea C, Doktycz Mitchel J, Retterer Scott T
Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831; The Center for Nanophase Material Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831; and The Bredesen Center, The University of Tennessee , Knoxville, Tennessee 37996.
Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory , Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831.
J Vac Sci Technol B Nanotechnol Microelectron. 2015 Nov;33(6):06FM03. doi: 10.1116/1.4932671. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
New strategies for combining conventional photo- and soft-lithographic techniques with high-resolution patterning and etching strategies are needed in order to produce multiscale fluidic platforms that address the full range of functional scales seen in complex biological and chemical systems. The smallest resolution required for an application often dictates the fabrication method used. Micromachining and micropowder blasting yield higher throughput, but lack the resolution needed to fully address biological and chemical systems at the cellular and molecular scales. In contrast, techniques such as electron beam lithography or nanoimprinting allow nanoscale resolution, but are traditionally considered costly and slow. Other techniques such as photolithography or soft lithography have characteristics between these extremes. Combining these techniques to fabricate multiscale or hybrid fluidics allows fundamental biological and chemical questions to be answered. In this study, a combination of photolithography and electron beam lithography are used to produce two multiscale fluidic devices that incorporate porous membranes into complex fluidic networks in order to control the flow of energy, information, and materials in chemical form. In the first device, materials and energy were used to support chemical reactions. A nanoporous membrane fabricated with e-beam lithography separates two parallel, serpentine channels. Photolithography was used to pattern microfluidic channels around the membrane. The pores were written at 150 nm and reduced in size with silicon dioxide deposition from plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition and atomic layer deposition. Using this method, the molecular weight cutoff of the membrane can be adapted to the system of interest. In the second approach, photolithography was used to fabricate 200 nm thin pores. The pores confined microbes and allowed energy replenishment from a media perfusion channel. The same device can be used for study of intercellular communication via the secretion and uptake of signal molecules. Pore size was tested with 750 nm fluorescent polystyrene beads and fluorescein dye. The 200 nm polydimethylsiloxane pores were shown to be robust enough to hold 750 nm beads while under pressure, but allow fluorescein to diffuse across the barrier. Further testing showed that extended culture of bacteria within the chambers was possible. These two examples show how lithographically defined porous membranes can be adapted to two unique situations and used to tune the flow of chemical energy, materials, and information within a microfluidic network.
为了制造出能应对复杂生物和化学系统中所有功能尺度的多尺度流体平台,需要将传统光刻技术与软光刻技术相结合,并采用高分辨率图案化和蚀刻策略的新方法。应用所需的最小分辨率通常决定了所使用的制造方法。微加工和微粉喷砂可实现更高的通量,但缺乏在细胞和分子尺度上全面应对生物和化学系统所需的分辨率。相比之下,电子束光刻或纳米压印等技术可实现纳米级分辨率,但传统上被认为成本高且速度慢。光刻或软光刻等其他技术则介于这两种极端情况之间。将这些技术结合起来制造多尺度或混合流体装置,有助于回答基本的生物和化学问题。在本研究中,光刻技术与电子束光刻技术相结合,制造了两种多尺度流体装置,这些装置将多孔膜整合到复杂的流体网络中,以控制能量、信息和化学形式的物质的流动。在第一个装置中,物质和能量被用于支持化学反应。用电子束光刻制造的纳米多孔膜将两条平行的蛇形通道分隔开。光刻技术用于在膜周围制作微流体通道的图案。这些孔的尺寸为150纳米,通过等离子体增强化学气相沉积和原子层沉积法沉积二氧化硅,使其尺寸减小。使用这种方法,膜的截留分子量可以根据目标系统进行调整。在第二种方法中,光刻技术用于制造200纳米厚的细孔。这些孔可限制微生物,并允许从介质灌注通道补充能量。同一装置可用于通过信号分子的分泌和摄取来研究细胞间通讯。用750纳米的荧光聚苯乙烯珠和荧光素染料测试了孔径。结果表明,200纳米的聚二甲基硅氧烷孔在受压时足够坚固,能够容纳750纳米的珠子,但允许荧光素扩散穿过屏障。进一步的测试表明,在小室内对细菌进行长时间培养是可行的。这两个例子展示了光刻定义的多孔膜如何能适用于两种独特的情况,并用于调节微流体网络内化学能量、物质和信息的流动。