Kiesow Andreas, Sarembe Sandra, Pizzey Robert L, Axe Alyson S, Bradshaw David J
Head, Group Characterization of Medical and Cosmetic Care Products, Fraunhofer Institute for Mechanics of Materials IWM, Halle, Germany.
Project Manager, Group Characterization of Medical and Cosmetic Care Products, Fraunhofer Institute for Mechanics of Materials IWM, Halle, Germany.
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Feb;115(2):189-198.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.010. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
Regular denture cleaning is essential to good oral health, but only limited evidence is available regarding the effects of common cleaning routines.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the compatibility of denture materials with and the antimicrobial effects of typical cleaning regimens.
The evaluated treatments were derived from a study of dental professional recommendations and consumer habits, including denture cleanser tablets, toothpaste, mouthwash, isopropyl alcohol (IPA), household bleach, soap, and vinegar. The material integrity of denture materials, including polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and metals, was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy and profilometry after treatment with laboratory regimens simulating 2 years of typical consumer use. Treatments were also evaluated in a microbial kill time assay against a range of oral microorganisms with typical treatment regimens.
Alcohol-based mouthwash and IPA damaged the surface of PMMA, and brushing with toothpaste caused scratching and surface material loss. Bleach caused limited damage to PMMA, but corroded CoCr alloy (pitting) and solder (layer formation). Denture tablets caused little damage to any materials apart from the layer formation on silver solder. Vinegar and soap were compatible with all materials. In antimicrobial assays, bleach gave excellent results, and IPA and mouthwash required concentrated dilutions to be effective. Cleanser tablets were effective at 5 minutes treatment time against all organisms. Toothpaste was effective against bacteria but not Candida albicans. Vinegar, soaps, salt, and sodium bicarbonate were microbially ineffective.
Bleach was highly antimicrobial but incompatible with metal dental prosthesis components. IPA and mouthwash were antimicrobial but damaged PMMA. Specialist denture cleanser tablets gave a good combination of microbial efficacy and reasonable material compatibility.
定期清洁假牙对保持良好的口腔健康至关重要,但关于常见清洁程序的效果,现有证据有限。
本体外研究的目的是确定假牙材料与典型清洁方案的兼容性以及抗菌效果。
所评估的处理方法源自对牙科专业建议和消费者习惯的研究,包括假牙清洁片、牙膏、漱口水、异丙醇(IPA)、家用漂白剂、肥皂和醋。在用模拟两年典型消费者使用的实验室方案处理后,通过扫描电子显微镜和轮廓仪评估假牙材料(包括聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)和金属)的材料完整性。还通过微生物杀灭时间试验,采用典型处理方案,对一系列口腔微生物评估这些处理方法。
含酒精的漱口水和IPA会损坏PMMA的表面,用牙膏刷牙会导致刮擦和表面材料损失。漂白剂对PMMA造成的损害有限,但会腐蚀钴铬合金(点蚀)和焊料(形成层)。假牙清洁片除了会使银焊料形成层外,对任何材料造成的损害都很小。醋和肥皂与所有材料都兼容。在抗菌试验中,漂白剂效果极佳,IPA和漱口水需要高浓度稀释才有效。清洁片在处理5分钟时对所有微生物都有效。牙膏对细菌有效,但对白色念珠菌无效。醋、肥皂、盐和碳酸氢钠在微生物方面无效。
漂白剂具有高度抗菌性,但与金属假牙部件不兼容。IPA和漱口水具有抗菌性,但会损坏PMMA。专业假牙清洁片在微生物功效和合理的材料兼容性方面取得了良好的平衡。