Pruneda-Álvarez Lucia G, Pérez-Vázquez Francisco J, Ruíz-Vera Tania, Ochoa-Martínez Ángeles C, Orta-García Sandra T, Jiménez-Avalos Jorge A, Pérez-Maldonado Iván N
Laboratorio de Toxicología Molecular, Centro de Investigación Aplicada en Ambiente y Salud (CIAAS), Coordinación para la Innovación y Aplicación de la Ciencia y la Tecnología (CIACYT), Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, Mexico.
Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, Mexico.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Apr;23(7):6816-25. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-5918-0. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
Recently, in developing countries, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) have been considered contaminants of grave concern for women and children. Therefore, the aim of this study was twofold: (1) evaluate exposure assessment to PAHs using urinary 1-hydroxypyrene (1-OHP) as an exposure biomarker and (2) perform a health risk assessment in women from four different high risk scenarios in Mexico. From 2012 to 2013, in a cross-sectional study, we evaluated a total of 184 healthy women from the following scenarios: (A) indoor biomass combustion site (n = 50); (B) brick manufacturing site using different materials such as fuel sources (n = 70); (C) industrial site (n = 44); and (D) high vehicular traffic site (n = 20). 1-hydroxypyrene (1-OHP) was quantified using a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) technique. Afterward, a probabilistic health risk assessment was performed (Monte Carlo analysis). Mean urinary 1-OHP levels found were 0.92 ± 0.92; 0.91 ± 0.83; 0.22 ± 0.19; and 0.14 ± 0.17 μg/L for scenario A, B, C, and D, respectively. Then, based on the measured urinary 1-OHP levels, the estimated median daily intake doses of pyrene were calculated: 659, 623, 162, and 77.4 ng/kg/day for the women participating in the study living in areas A, B, C, and D, respectively, and finally, the hazard quotient (HQ) was calculated (22 ± 21, 21 ± 20, 5.5 ± 5.5, and 2.6 ± 3.5; for areas A, B, C, and D, respectively), high health risk was noted for the women living in the studied communities. The data shown in this study (exposure levels to PAHs and health risk assessment) made it reasonable to conclude that the exposure levels found have a significant potential for generating adverse effects on human health in the studied scenarios.
最近,在发展中国家,多环芳烃(PAHs)被视为对妇女和儿童极具危害的污染物。因此,本研究的目的有两个:(1)以尿中1-羟基芘(1-OHP)作为暴露生物标志物评估PAHs的暴露情况;(2)对墨西哥四种不同高风险场景下的女性进行健康风险评估。2012年至2013年,在一项横断面研究中,我们评估了来自以下场景的184名健康女性:(A)室内生物质燃烧场所(n = 50);(B)使用不同材料(如燃料源)的砖厂(n = 70);(C)工业场所(n = 44);以及(D)高车辆流量场所(n = 20)。采用高效液相色谱(HPLC)技术对1-羟基芘(1-OHP)进行定量。随后,进行了概率健康风险评估(蒙特卡洛分析)。场景A、B、C和D的尿中1-OHP平均水平分别为0.92±0.92;0.91±0.83;0.22±0.19;和0.14±0.17μg/L。然后,根据测得的尿中1-OHP水平,计算出芘的估计每日中位数摄入量:参与研究的居住在A、B、C和D区的女性分别为659、623、162和77.4 ng/kg/天,最后,计算出危害商(HQ)(A、B、C和D区分别为22±21、21±20、5.5±5.5和2.6±3.5),研究社区的女性存在较高的健康风险。本研究中显示的数据(PAHs暴露水平和健康风险评估)合理地得出结论,在所研究的场景中,发现的暴露水平对人类健康产生不利影响的可能性很大。