• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Evaluation of biologic effects of dental materials using four different cell culture techniques.

作者信息

Hensten-Pettersen A, Helgeland K

出版信息

Scand J Dent Res. 1977 May;85(4):291-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1977.tb00565.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0722.1977.tb00565.x
PMID:266755
Abstract

The cytotoxicity of fresh and 1-day-old silicate cement, composite restorative material and zinc oxide-eugenol cement (ZOE) was tested using human epithelial cells (NCTC 2544) in four different cell culture systems: (1) 51Cr-release from prelabeled cells after incubation for 4 and 24 h in the presence of the materials. (2) Implanting the materials on an agar everlay and visualizing any cytotoxic effects after 24 h by neutral red vital stain. (3) Cell growth during 5 d in the presence of the materials. (4) Colony-forming ability after exposure of the cells for 30 min to medium previously incubated with the materials for 24 h. Freshly prepared and 1-day-old ZOE exhibited a prominent cytotoxic effect in all four systems. A less marked effect was found for the composite material in systems 2, 3, and 4, while silicate cement appeared to be the least toxic material in these three systems. Neither silicate cement nor composite showed any cytotoxic effect in system 1 based on 51Cr-release. It is concluded that the effects obtained by the cell culture techniques did not mimic the reactions obtained when the materials are tested under conditions which reflect their clinical use.

摘要

相似文献

1
Evaluation of biologic effects of dental materials using four different cell culture techniques.
Scand J Dent Res. 1977 May;85(4):291-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1977.tb00565.x.
2
In vitro toxicity evaluation of dental restorative materials using cell culture technique.
Tokyo Ika Shika Daigaku Iyo Kizai Kenkyusho Hokoku. 1980;14:115-8.
3
[Comparative studies on the cytotoxic effect of composite filling materials and silicate cement].
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1976 Dec;31(12):919-23.
4
A comparison of the in vitro cytotoxicity of four restorative materials assessed by changes in enzyme levels in two cell types.
J Biomed Mater Res. 1982 Jul;16(4):519-28. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820160417.
5
[Evaluation of dental materials using a new cell culture technic].[使用一种新的细胞培养技术对牙科材料进行评估]
Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi. 1983 Dec;50(4):654.
6
Pulp reaction to a tri-cure resin-modified glass ionomer.牙髓对一种三重固化树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀的反应。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998 Jun;85(6):712-9. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(98)90040-3.
7
Pulpal studies: biocompatibility or effectiveness of marginal seal?牙髓研究:生物相容性还是边缘封闭效果?
Quintessence Int. 1990 Oct;21(10):775-9.
8
Biologic evaluation of filling materials. A comparison of results using cell culture techniques, implantation tests and pulp studies.
Int Dent J. 1977 Jun 2;27(2):124-9.
9
Toxicity of some dental cements in a cell culture system.某些牙科水门汀在细胞培养系统中的毒性
Scand J Dent Res. 1977 Sep;85(6):471-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1977.tb00580.x.
10
[Comparative biological testing of Ketac-Bond glass ionomer cement].
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1990 Apr;45(4):202-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Anti-inflammatory efficacy of petasin-incorporated zinc oxide eugenol sealer - An zebrafish study.含蜂斗菜素的氧化锌丁香酚封闭剂的抗炎功效——一项斑马鱼研究
J Conserv Dent. 2021 Nov-Dec;24(6):539-543. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_433_21. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
2
A critical analysis of research methods and experimental models to study biocompatibility of endodontic materials.根管材料生物相容性研究方法和实验模型的批判性分析。
Int Endod J. 2022 Apr;55 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):346-369. doi: 10.1111/iej.13701. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
3
Cytotoxicity of temporary cements on bovine dental pulp-derived cells (bDPCs) using realtime cell analysis.
使用实时细胞分析评估暂封材料对牛牙髓细胞(bDPCs)的细胞毒性。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2015 Feb;7(1):21-6. doi: 10.4047/jap.2015.7.1.21. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
4
Insights into and relative effect of chitosan-H, chitosan-H-propolis, chitosan-H-propolis-nystatin and chitosan-H-nystatin on dentine bond strength.壳聚糖-H、壳聚糖-H-蜂胶、壳聚糖-H-蜂胶-制霉菌素和壳聚糖-H-制霉菌素对牙本质粘结强度的影响及相关见解。
Eur J Dent. 2013 Oct;7(4):412-418. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.120666.
5
Quantification of fibrosis and mast cells in the tissue response of endodontic sealer irradiated by low-level laser therapy.经低水平激光治疗照射后的根管封闭剂组织反应中纤维化和肥大细胞的定量评估。
Lasers Med Sci. 2011 Nov;26(6):741-7. doi: 10.1007/s10103-010-0797-6. Epub 2010 Jun 12.
6
A novel spectrofluorometric technique for specific biocompatibility testing of implantable materials by cell culture. Report on use for multiparameter analysis of human osteoblasts cultured on commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite.一种新颖的荧光光谱技术,用于通过细胞培养对可植入材料进行特定的生物相容性测试。报告了其在商业纯钛和羟基磷灰石上培养的人成骨细胞的多参数分析中的应用。
Cytotechnology. 2001 Mar;35(2):93-100. doi: 10.1023/A:1017570815169.
7
[Neon-colored plastics for orthodontic appliances. Biocompatibility studies].[用于正畸矫治器的霓虹色塑料。生物相容性研究]
Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1995 Jan;56(1):41-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02265838.
8
A model culture system with human gingival fibroblasts for evaluating the cytotoxicity of dental materials.一种用于评估牙科材料细胞毒性的含人牙龈成纤维细胞的模型培养系统。
In Vitro. 1982 Jul;18(7):650-60. doi: 10.1007/BF02796398.
9
[The testing of the toxicity of the plastics used in orthodontics].[正畸学中使用的塑料的毒性测试]
Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1992 Oct;53(5):263-72. doi: 10.1007/BF02325075.
10
51Cr release cytotoxicity assay evaluated with fluoride and cadmium.用氟化物和镉评估51铬释放细胞毒性测定法。
Agents Actions. 1978 Apr;8(3):311-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01966621.