Suppr超能文献

根管材料生物相容性研究方法和实验模型的批判性分析。

A critical analysis of research methods and experimental models to study biocompatibility of endodontic materials.

机构信息

School of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

Inserm, UMR 1229, RMeS, Regenerative Medicine and Skeleton, Université de Nantes, ONIRIS, Nantes, France.

出版信息

Int Endod J. 2022 Apr;55 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):346-369. doi: 10.1111/iej.13701. Epub 2022 Feb 28.

Abstract

Materials used for endodontics and with direct contact to tissues have a wide range of indications, from vital pulpal treatments to root filling materials and those used in endodontic surgery. In principle, interaction with dental materials may result in damage to tissues locally or systemically. Thus, a great variety of test methods are applied to evaluate a materials' potential risk of adverse biological effects to ensure their biocompatibility before commercialization. However, the results of biocompatibility evaluations are dependent on not only the tested materials but also the test methods due to the diversity of these effects and numerous variables involved. In addition, diverse biological effects require equally diverse assessments on a structured and planned approach. Such a structured assessment of the materials consists of four phases: general toxicity, local tissue irritation, pre-clinical tests and clinical evaluations. Various types of screening assays are available; it is imperative to understand their advantages and limitations to recognize their appropriateness and for an accurate interpretation of their results. Recent scientific advances are rapidly introducing new materials to endodontics including nanomaterials, gene therapy and tissue engineering biomaterials. These new modalities open a new era to restore and regenerate dental tissues; however, all these new technologies can also present new hazards to patients. Before any clinical usage, new materials must be proven to be safe and not hazardous to health. Certain international standards exist for safety evaluation of dental materials (ISO 10993 series, ISO 7405 and ISO 14155-1), but researchers often fail to follow these standards due to lack of access to standards, limitation of the guidelines and complexity of new experimental methods, which may cause technical errors. Moreover, many laboratories have developed their testing strategy for biocompatibility, which makes any comparison between findings more difficult. The purpose of this review was to discuss the concept of biocompatibility, structured test programmes and international standards for testing the biocompatibility of endodontic material biocompatibility. The text will further detail current test methods for evaluating the biocompatibility of endodontic materials, and their advantages and limitations.

摘要

用于牙髓学并与组织直接接触的材料具有广泛的用途,从牙髓活力治疗到根管充填材料和根管内手术材料。原则上,与牙科材料的相互作用可能会导致局部或全身组织损伤。因此,为了确保其在商业化之前具有良好的生物相容性,人们应用了各种测试方法来评估材料潜在的不良生物学效应的风险。然而,生物相容性评估的结果不仅取决于被测试的材料,还取决于测试方法,因为这些效应具有多样性,涉及许多变量。此外,多样化的生物学效应需要在结构化和有计划的方法上进行同样多样化的评估。这种对材料的结构化评估包括四个阶段:一般毒性、局部组织刺激、临床前测试和临床评估。有多种类型的筛选试验可用;了解其优缺点对于识别其适宜性以及准确解释其结果至关重要。最近的科学进步正在迅速将纳米材料、基因治疗和组织工程生物材料等新材料引入牙髓学。这些新方法为牙齿组织的修复和再生开辟了一个新时代;然而,所有这些新技术也可能给患者带来新的危害。在任何临床应用之前,必须证明新材料是安全的,不会对健康造成危害。现有的国际标准(如 ISO 10993 系列、ISO 7405 和 ISO 14155-1)可用于牙科材料的安全性评估,但由于缺乏对标准的了解、指南的局限性以及新实验方法的复杂性,研究人员往往无法遵循这些标准,这可能会导致技术错误。此外,许多实验室已经制定了自己的生物相容性测试策略,这使得比较不同实验室的发现更加困难。本文旨在讨论生物相容性的概念、结构化测试方案和用于测试根管材料生物相容性的国际标准。本文将进一步详细介绍目前用于评估根管材料生物相容性的测试方法及其优缺点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f55/9315036/404409fc0efa/IEJ-55-346-g004.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验