• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强力霉素联合链霉素与强力霉素联合利福平治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的对比试验

Comparative trial of doxycycline plus streptomycin versus doxycycline plus rifampin for the therapy of human brucellosis.

作者信息

Colmenero Castillo J D, Hernandez Marquez S, Reguera Iglesias J M, Cabrera Franquelo F, Rius Diaz F, Alonso A

机构信息

Departamento Medicina Interna, Hospital Regional Carlos Haya, Malaga, Espana.

出版信息

Chemotherapy. 1989;35(2):146-52. doi: 10.1159/000238662.

DOI:10.1159/000238662
PMID:2667903
Abstract

Effectiveness and therapeutic value of the doxycycline plus streptomycin and doxycycline plus rifampin schedules of treatment of human brucellosis have been assessed by carrying out a prospective study on 111 patients randomly distributed into two groups. Patients in group A were treated with doxycycline plus streptomycin sulphate and those in group B with doxycycline plus rifampin. The temperature of all patients reverted to normal, and 54 patients from group A (91.6%) and 45 from group B (86.5%) achieved total recovery with a single therapeutic cycle. Two therapeutic failures and 3 relapses in group A (8.4%) and 7 relapses in group B (13.46%) were observed. The tolerance to both regimens was good. Although the combination doxycycline plus rifampin offers a more convenient oral administration, in the light of these results, until more extensive research is carried out, it should be considered as an alternative rather than a first choice in the treatment of human brucellosis.

摘要

通过对111例随机分为两组的患者进行前瞻性研究,评估了强力霉素联合链霉素以及强力霉素联合利福平治疗人类布鲁氏菌病方案的有效性和治疗价值。A组患者接受强力霉素加硫酸链霉素治疗,B组患者接受强力霉素加利福平治疗。所有患者体温均恢复正常,A组54例患者(91.6%)和B组45例患者(86.5%)经单一治疗周期实现完全康复。观察到A组有2例治疗失败和3例复发(8.4%),B组有7例复发(13.46%)。两种治疗方案的耐受性均良好。尽管强力霉素加利福平联合用药口服给药更方便,但鉴于这些结果,在开展更广泛的研究之前,在人类布鲁氏菌病治疗中应将其视为一种替代方案而非首选方案。

相似文献

1
Comparative trial of doxycycline plus streptomycin versus doxycycline plus rifampin for the therapy of human brucellosis.强力霉素联合链霉素与强力霉素联合利福平治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的对比试验
Chemotherapy. 1989;35(2):146-52. doi: 10.1159/000238662.
2
Comparative trial of rifampin-doxycycline versus tetracycline-streptomycin in the therapy of human brucellosis.利福平-多西环素与四环素-链霉素治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的对比试验
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Oct;28(4):548-51. doi: 10.1128/AAC.28.4.548.
3
[A comparative therapeutic and multicenter trial of rifampicin and doxycycline versus streptomycin and doxycycline in human brucellosis].利福平与强力霉素对比链霉素与强力霉素治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的多中心对照试验
Med Clin (Barc). 1991 May 4;96(17):649-53.
4
Comparison of doxycycline-streptomycin, doxycycline-rifampin, and ofloxacin-rifampin in the treatment of brucellosis: a randomized clinical trial.多西环素-链霉素、多西环素-利福平与氧氟沙星-利福平治疗布鲁氏菌病的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Int J Infect Dis. 2012 Apr;16(4):e247-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2011.12.003. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
5
Doxycycline plus streptomycin versus ciprofloxacin plus rifampicin in spinal brucellosis [ISRCTN31053647].多西环素联合链霉素与环丙沙星联合利福平治疗脊柱布鲁氏菌病的对比研究[国际标准随机对照试验编号:ISRCTN31053647]
BMC Infect Dis. 2006 Apr 11;6:72. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-6-72.
6
Treatment of human brucellosis with doxycycline plus rifampin or doxycycline plus streptomycin. A randomized, double-blind study.强力霉素联合利福平或强力霉素联合链霉素治疗人类布鲁氏菌病。一项随机双盲研究。
Ann Intern Med. 1992 Jul 1;117(1):25-30. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-117-1-25.
7
Doxycycline-rifampin versus doxycycline-streptomycin in treatment of human brucellosis due to Brucella melitensis. The GECMEI Group. Grupo de Estudio de Castilla-la Mancha de Enfermedades Infecciosas.多西环素-利福平与多西环素-链霉素治疗羊种布鲁氏菌引起的人类布鲁氏菌病。GECMEI研究组。卡斯蒂利亚-拉曼恰传染病研究组。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Sep;39(9):2061-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.9.2061.
8
Possible implications of doxycycline-rifampin interaction for treatment of brucellosis.强力霉素-利福平相互作用对布鲁氏菌病治疗的潜在影响。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 Dec;38(12):2798-802. doi: 10.1128/AAC.38.12.2798.
9
Ofloxacin plus rifampicin versus doxycycline plus rifampicin in the treatment of brucellosis: a randomized clinical trial [ISRCTN11871179].氧氟沙星联合利福平与多西环素联合利福平治疗布鲁氏菌病的随机临床试验[ISRCTN11871179]
BMC Infect Dis. 2004 Jun 23;4:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-4-18.
10
Doxycycline-rifampin versus doxycycline-rifampin-gentamicin in treatment of human brucellosis.多西环素-利福平与多西环素-利福平-庆大霉素治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的比较
Trop Doct. 2012 Jan;42(1):13-7. doi: 10.1258/td.2011.110284.

引用本文的文献

1
Endocarditis brucelis: A case report of a hidden complication.布鲁氏菌性心内膜炎:一例隐匿并发症的病例报告
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2025 May;130:111253. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.111253. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
2
Updated therapeutic options for human brucellosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.人布鲁氏菌病的治疗选择更新:随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Aug 22;18(8):e0012405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012405. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Efficacy and safety of therapeutic strategies for human brucellosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
治疗人类布鲁氏菌病策略的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Mar 11;18(3):e0012010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012010. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Rifampicin versus streptomycin for brucellosis treatment in humans: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.利福平与链霉素治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 20;13(2):e0191993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191993. eCollection 2018.
5
Pathogenesis and immunobiology of brucellosis: review of Brucella-host interactions.布鲁氏菌病的发病机制与免疫生物学:布鲁氏菌与宿主相互作用的综述
Am J Pathol. 2015 Jun;185(6):1505-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
6
Antibiotics for treating human brucellosis.用于治疗人类布鲁氏菌病的抗生素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD007179. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007179.pub2.
7
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in the treatment of human brucellosis.系统评价和随机临床试验荟萃分析治疗人类布鲁氏菌病。
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032090. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
8
Perspectives for the treatment of brucellosis in the 21st century: the Ioannina recommendations.21世纪布鲁氏菌病的治疗前景:约阿尼纳建议
PLoS Med. 2007 Dec;4(12):e317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040317.
9
Brucella endocarditis: clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic approach.布鲁氏菌性心内膜炎:临床、诊断及治疗方法
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003 Nov;22(11):647-50. doi: 10.1007/s10096-003-1026-z. Epub 2003 Oct 18.
10
Posttreatment follow-Up of brucellosis by PCR assay.布鲁氏菌病治疗后通过聚合酶链反应检测进行随访
J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Dec;37(12):4163-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.12.4163-4166.1999.