Singh Anil P, Singh Dharmraj, Singh Yashpal, Jain Gaurav
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Anesth Essays Res. 2015 Sep-Dec;9(3):369-73. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.161805.
Postoperative pain control after major abdominal surgery is the prime concern of anesthesiologist. Among various methodologies, epidural analgesia is the most preferred technique because of the excellent quality of analgesia with minimum side-effects.
The present study was designated to compare postoperative analgesic efficacy and safety of epidural tramadol as adjuvant to ropivacaine (0.2%) in adult upper abdominal surgery.
Prospective, randomized-controlled, double-blinded trial.
Ninety patients planned for upper abdominal surgery under general anesthesia were randomized into three equal groups to receive epidural drug via epidural catheter at start of incisional wound closure: Group R to receive ropivacaine (0.2%); Group RT1 to receive tramadol 1 mg/kg with ropivacaine (0.2%); and RT2 to receive tramadol 2 mg/kg with ropivacaine (0.2%). Duration and quality of analgesia (visual analog scale [VAS] score), hemodynamic parameters, and adverse event were recorded and statistically analyzed.
One-way analysis of variance test, Fisher's exact test/Chi-square test, whichever appropriate. A P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Mean duration of analgesia after epidural bolus drug was significantly higher in Group RT2 (584 ± 58 min) when compared with RT1 (394 ± 46 min) or R Group (283 ± 35 min). VAS score was always lower in RT2 Group in comparison to other group during the study. Hemodynamic parameter remained stable in all three groups.
We conclude that tramadol 2 mg/kg with ropivacaine (0.2%) provides more effective and longer-duration analgesia than tramadol 1 mg/kg with ropivacaine (0.2%).
腹部大手术后的术后疼痛控制是麻醉医生首要关注的问题。在各种方法中,硬膜外镇痛是最受青睐的技术,因为其镇痛效果极佳且副作用最小。
本研究旨在比较成人上腹部手术中,硬膜外注射曲马多作为0.2%罗哌卡因辅助用药的术后镇痛效果及安全性。
前瞻性、随机对照、双盲试验。
90例计划接受全身麻醉下上腹部手术的患者被随机分为三组,每组人数相等,在切口缝合开始时通过硬膜外导管接受硬膜外用药:R组接受0.2%罗哌卡因;RT1组接受1mg/kg曲马多与0.2%罗哌卡因;RT2组接受2mg/kg曲马多与0.2%罗哌卡因。记录镇痛持续时间和质量(视觉模拟评分[VAS])、血流动力学参数及不良事件,并进行统计学分析。
采用单因素方差分析、Fisher精确检验或卡方检验(视情况而定)。P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
与RT1组(394±4分钟)或R组(283±35分钟)相比,RT2组硬膜外推注药物后的平均镇痛持续时间显著更长(584±58分钟)。在研究期间,RT2组的VAS评分始终低于其他组。三组的血流动力学参数均保持稳定。
我们得出结论,2mg/kg曲马多与0.2%罗哌卡因联合使用比1mg/kg曲马多与0.2%罗哌卡因联合使用提供更有效、持续时间更长的镇痛效果。