Gunn M L, Hansbrough J F, Davis J W, Furst S R, Field T O
Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego Medical Center 92103.
J Trauma. 1989 Sep;29(9):1261-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198909000-00013.
We prospectively randomized 51 adult burned patients on admission to study fluid, electrolyte, and physiologic parameters during burn resuscitation with the use of hypertonic saline (HSL, Na 250 mEq/L, 514 mOsm) or lactated Ringer's solution (LR, Na 130 mEq/L, 268 mOsm). Patients suffered at least 20% total body surface area burns (BSA); the mean BSA injury was 36.7% BSA, with a range of 20 to 74% BSA. All patients were admitted to our Burn Center within at least 12 hours of injury. Laboratory studies included frequent determinations of serum chemistries including osmolalities, and continuous 24-hour urine collections for electrolytes and osmolality determinations. Fluid requirements (cc/kg/% BSA), urine output (cc/kg/hr), sodium intake and excretion (mEq/kg/% BSA), serum and urine osmolality (mOsm/kg), serum creatinine (mg/dl), body weight (kg), and enteral intake (cc/24 hrs and calories/24 hrs) were analyzed for comparison at 24-hour intervals following burn injury. Using Student's t-test, significance was attributed to a p less than 0.05. Nonparametric methods were used to compare non-normalized data. Regression analysis was used to compare sodium intake (mEq/kg) and fluid intake (cc/kg) between the HSL and the LR groups in relation to % BSA. Our data show no advantage of HSL over conventional therapy with LR for burn resuscitation. We were not able to demonstrate decreased fluid requirements, improved tolerance of feedings, or decrease in per cent weight gain.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
我们前瞻性地将51名成年烧伤患者在入院时随机分组,以研究在烧伤复苏期间使用高渗盐水(HSL,钠含量250 mEq/L,渗透压514 mOsm)或乳酸林格氏液(LR,钠含量130 mEq/L,渗透压268 mOsm)时的液体、电解质和生理参数。患者全身烧伤总面积至少为20%;平均烧伤面积为36.7%,范围在20%至74%之间。所有患者均在受伤后至少12小时内被收入我们的烧伤中心。实验室检查包括频繁测定血清化学指标,包括渗透压,以及连续24小时收集尿液以测定电解质和渗透压。分析烧伤后每隔24小时的液体需求量(cc/kg/%烧伤面积)、尿量(cc/kg/小时)、钠摄入量和排泄量(mEq/kg/%烧伤面积)、血清和尿液渗透压(mOsm/kg)、血清肌酐(mg/dl)、体重(kg)以及肠内摄入量(cc/24小时和卡路里/24小时)以进行比较。使用学生t检验,p值小于0.05具有统计学意义。使用非参数方法比较非标准化数据。回归分析用于比较HSL组和LR组之间与烧伤面积百分比相关的钠摄入量(mEq/kg)和液体摄入量(cc/kg)。我们的数据表明,在烧伤复苏方面,HSL并不优于传统的LR治疗。我们未能证明液体需求量减少、对喂养的耐受性提高或体重增加百分比降低。(摘要截选至250字)