Suppr超能文献

B族链球菌携带者的产前胎膜剥离,是否安全?(STRIP-G研究)

Antepartum Membrane Stripping in GBS Carriers, Is It Safe? (The STRIP-G Study).

作者信息

Kabiri Doron, Hants Yael, Yarkoni Tom Raz, Shaulof Esther, Friedman Smadar Eventov, Paltiel Ora, Nir-Paz Ran, Aljamal Wesam E, Ezra Yossef

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.

Department of Neonatology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Dec 31;10(12):e0145905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145905. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Stripping of the membranes is an established and widely utilized obstetric procedure associated with higher spontaneous vaginal delivery rates, reduced need for formal induction of labor and a lower likelihood of post-term pregnancy. Due to the theoretical concern of bacterial seeding during the procedure many practitioners choose not to sweep the membranes in Group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonized patients. We conducted 'the STRIP-G study' in order to determine whether maternal and neonatal outcomes are affected by GBS carrier status in women undergoing membrane stripping.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a prospective study in a tertiary referral center, comparing maternal and neonatal outcomes following membrane stripping among GBS-positive, GBS-negative, and GBS-unknown patients. We compared the incidence of composite adverse neonatal outcomes (primary outcome) among the three study groups, while secondary outcome measure was composite adverse maternal outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 542 women were included in the study, of which 135 were GBS-positive, 361 GBS-negative, and 46 GBS-unknown status. Demographic, obstetric, and intra-partum characteristics were similar for all groups. Adverse neonatal outcomes were observed in 8 (5.9%), 31 (8.6%), and 2 (4.3%) in the GBS-positive, GBS-negative, and unknown groups, respectively (P = 0.530), (Odds Ratio between GBS-Positive vs. GBS-Negative groups 0.67 (95%, CI = 0.30-1.50)); while composite adverse maternal outcomes occurred in 9 (6.66%), 31 (8.59%), and 5 (10.87%) in the GBS-positive, GBS-negative, and unknown groups, respectively (P = 0.617).

CONCLUSIONS

Antepartum membrane stripping in GBS carriers appears to be a safe obstetrical procedure that does not adversely affect maternal or neonatal outcomes.

摘要

目的

胎膜剥离术是一种成熟且广泛应用的产科操作,与较高的自然阴道分娩率、减少正式引产需求以及降低过期妊娠可能性相关。由于该操作过程中存在细菌植入的理论担忧,许多从业者选择不对B族链球菌(GBS)定植的患者进行胎膜清扫。我们开展了“STRIP - G研究”,以确定GBS携带状态是否会影响接受胎膜剥离术女性的母婴结局。

研究设计

我们在一家三级转诊中心进行了一项前瞻性研究,比较GBS阳性、GBS阴性和GBS状态未知患者胎膜剥离术后的母婴结局。我们比较了三个研究组中复合不良新生儿结局(主要结局)的发生率,次要结局指标是复合不良母亲结局。

结果

共有542名女性纳入研究,其中135名GBS阳性,361名GBS阴性,46名GBS状态未知。所有组的人口统计学、产科和产时特征相似。GBS阳性组、GBS阴性组和未知组分别有8例(5.9%)、31例(8.6%)和2例(4.3%)出现不良新生儿结局(P = 0.530),(GBS阳性组与GBS阴性组之间的比值比为0.67(95%,CI = 0.30 - 1.50));而GBS阳性组、GBS阴性组和未知组分别有9例(6.66%)、31例(8.59%)和5例(10.87%)出现复合不良母亲结局(P = 0.617)。

结论

GBS携带者的产前胎膜剥离术似乎是一种安全的产科操作,不会对母婴结局产生不利影响。

相似文献

1
Antepartum Membrane Stripping in GBS Carriers, Is It Safe? (The STRIP-G Study).
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 31;10(12):e0145905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145905. eCollection 2015.
3
Vaginal streptococcus B colonization is not associated with increased infectious morbidity in labor induction.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Aug;100(8):1501-1510. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14154. Epub 2021 May 2.
5
Epidemiology and predictive values of risk factors for neonatal group B streptococcal sepsis.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002 Nov;42(5):497-503. doi: 10.1111/j.0004-8666.2002.00497.x.
7
Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after preterm premature rupture of membranes among women carrying group B streptococcus.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Apr;129(1):13-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.10.024. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
8
Use of GBS media for rapid detection of group B streptococci in vaginal and rectal swabs from women in labor.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2001 Feb;20(2):120-2. doi: 10.1007/s100960000446.
9
Is group B streptococcal screening during pregnancy justified?
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985 Mar;92(3):197-201. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1985.tb01081.x.
10
The recurrence risk of group B Streptococcus in consecutive deliveries.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Jul;33(13):2263-2268. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1548596. Epub 2019 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

3
Membrane stripping in group B streptococcus carriers does not impede adequate intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis: a retrospective study.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 5;11:1368998. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1368998. eCollection 2024.
4
Dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) versus adjunctive sweeping of membranes and DVI for term induction of labor.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021 Sep;47(9):3171-3178. doi: 10.1111/jog.14907. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
5
Review of Evidence-Based Methods for Successful Labor Induction.
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2021 Jul;66(4):459-469. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13238. Epub 2021 May 13.
6
High prevalence of Group B Streptococcus colonization among pregnant women in Amman, Jordan.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 May 20;19(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2317-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care.
Lancet. 2014 Sep 20;384(9948):1129-45. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60789-3. Epub 2014 Jun 22.
2
An overview of global GBS epidemiology.
Vaccine. 2013 Aug 28;31 Suppl 4:D7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.01.009.
4
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 485: Prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal disease in newborns.
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;117(4):1019-1027. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318219229b.
5
Using a simplified Bishop score to predict vaginal delivery.
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;117(4):805-811. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182114ad2.
7
Evaluation of universal antenatal screening for group B streptococcus.
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 18;360(25):2626-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806820.
8
The effect of membrane sweeping on prelabor rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial.
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;111(6):1313-9. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816fdcf3.
9
Probable early-onset group B streptococcal neonatal sepsis: a serious clinical condition related to intrauterine infection.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008 Mar;93(2):F85-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.2007.119958. Epub 2007 Aug 17.
10
Membrane sweeping at initiation of formal labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Mar;107(3):569-77. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000200094.89388.70.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验