Suppr超能文献

混合觅食视觉搜索中的引导与选择历史

Guidance and selection history in hybrid foraging visual search.

作者信息

Wolfe Jeremy M, Cain Matthew S, Aizenman Avigael M

机构信息

Visual Attention Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Ophthalmology and Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Apr;81(3):637-653. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-01649-5.

Abstract

In Hybrid Foraging tasks, observers search for multiple instances of several types of target. Collecting all the dirty laundry and kitchenware out of a child's room would be a real-world example. How are such foraging episodes structured? A series of four experiments shows that selection of one item from the display makes it more likely that the next item will be of the same type. This pattern holds if the targets are defined by basic features like color and shape but not if they are defined by their identity (e.g., the letters p & d). Additionally, switching between target types during search is expensive in time, with longer response times between successive selections if the target type changes than if they are the same. Finally, the decision to leave a screen/patch for the next screen in these foraging tasks is imperfectly consistent with the predictions of optimal foraging theory. The results of these hybrid foraging studies cast new light on the ways in which prior selection history guides subsequent visual search in general.

摘要

在混合觅食任务中,观察者要寻找几种类型目标的多个实例。从孩子的房间里收集所有脏衣服和厨具就是一个现实世界中的例子。这种觅食过程是如何构建的呢?一系列四项实验表明,从展示中选择一个物品会使下一个物品更有可能是同一类型。如果目标由颜色和形状等基本特征定义,这种模式成立,但如果由其身份定义(例如字母p和d)则不然。此外,在搜索过程中在不同目标类型之间切换在时间上代价高昂,如果目标类型改变,连续选择之间的反应时间会比目标类型相同时更长。最后,在这些觅食任务中决定离开一个屏幕/区域去下一个屏幕与最优觅食理论的预测并不完全一致。这些混合觅食研究的结果为先前选择历史通常如何指导后续视觉搜索提供了新的视角。

相似文献

1
Guidance and selection history in hybrid foraging visual search.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Apr;81(3):637-653. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-01649-5.
2
Hybrid foraging search: Searching for multiple instances of multiple types of target.
Vision Res. 2016 Feb;119:50-9. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.12.006. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
3
Hybrid foraging search in younger and older age.
Psychol Aging. 2019 Sep;34(6):805-820. doi: 10.1037/pag0000387. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
4
Hybrid value foraging: How the value of targets shapes human foraging behavior.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Apr;80(3):609-621. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1471-x.
5
The role of object categories in hybrid visual and memory search.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Aug;143(4):1585-99. doi: 10.1037/a0036313. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
6
Dynamics of visual attention revealed in foraging tasks.
Cognition. 2020 Jan;194:104032. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104032. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
7
Looking ahead: When do you find the next item in foraging visual search?
J Vis. 2020 Feb 10;20(2):3. doi: 10.1167/jov.20.2.3.
8
Foraging with Anne Treisman: Features versus conjunctions, patch leaving and memory for foraged locations.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Feb;82(2):818-831. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01941-y.
9
Using the past to anticipate the future in human foraging behavior.
Vision Res. 2015 Jun;111(Pt A):66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
10
Research on re-searching: interrupted foraging is not disrupted foraging.
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 May 15;9(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00556-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of Time Pressure on Successive Visual Searches.
J Eye Mov Res. 2025 Jul 17;18(4):31. doi: 10.3390/jemr18040031. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Understanding human visual foraging: a review.
Biol Cybern. 2025 Jul 23;119(4-6):20. doi: 10.1007/s00422-025-01020-6.
3
Foraging through emotions: emotional stimuli and participants' trait anxiety shape visual foraging.
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 May 21;12(5):242175. doi: 10.1098/rsos.242175. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Attention directs actions in visual foraging.
Sci Rep. 2025 May 6;15(1):15788. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97986-1.
5
One factor to bind them all: visual foraging organization to predict patch leaving behavior with ROC curves.
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Apr 5;10(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00624-7.
6
The effect of target scarcity on visual foraging.
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Dec 4;11(12):240060. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240060. eCollection 2024 Dec.
8
No matter what you do, travel is travel in visual foraging.
Vision Res. 2024 Nov;224:108491. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2024.108491. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
10
Foraging as sampling without replacement: A Bayesian statistical model for estimating biases in target selection.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Jan 24;18(1):e1009813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009813. eCollection 2022 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Five Factors that Guide Attention in Visual Search.
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Mar;1(3). doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0058. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
2
Visual Selection: Usually Fast and Automatic; Seldom Slow and Volitional.
J Cogn. 2018 May 14;1(1):29. doi: 10.5334/joc.13.
3
Foraging through multiple target categories reveals the flexibility of visual working memory.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Feb;183:108-115. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.12.005. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
4
Hybrid value foraging: How the value of targets shapes human foraging behavior.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Apr;80(3):609-621. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1471-x.
5
Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Apr;25(2):514-538. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1380-y.
6
How humans react to changing rewards during visual foraging.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Nov;79(8):2299-2309. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1411-9.
7
Limits in feature-based attention to multiple colors.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Nov;79(8):2327-2337. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1390-x.
8
Lack of Free Choice Reveals the Cost of Having to Search for More Than One Object.
Psychol Sci. 2017 Aug;28(8):1137-1147. doi: 10.1177/0956797617705667. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
9
Decoding working memory content from attentional biases.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1252-1260. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1204-5.
10
The Slopes Remain the Same: Reply to Wolfe (2016).
Iperception. 2016 Nov 10;7(6):2041669516673383. doi: 10.1177/2041669516673383. eCollection 2016 Nov-Dec.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验