Wolfe Jeremy M, Cain Matthew S, Aizenman Avigael M
Visual Attention Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Ophthalmology and Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Apr;81(3):637-653. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-01649-5.
In Hybrid Foraging tasks, observers search for multiple instances of several types of target. Collecting all the dirty laundry and kitchenware out of a child's room would be a real-world example. How are such foraging episodes structured? A series of four experiments shows that selection of one item from the display makes it more likely that the next item will be of the same type. This pattern holds if the targets are defined by basic features like color and shape but not if they are defined by their identity (e.g., the letters p & d). Additionally, switching between target types during search is expensive in time, with longer response times between successive selections if the target type changes than if they are the same. Finally, the decision to leave a screen/patch for the next screen in these foraging tasks is imperfectly consistent with the predictions of optimal foraging theory. The results of these hybrid foraging studies cast new light on the ways in which prior selection history guides subsequent visual search in general.
在混合觅食任务中,观察者要寻找几种类型目标的多个实例。从孩子的房间里收集所有脏衣服和厨具就是一个现实世界中的例子。这种觅食过程是如何构建的呢?一系列四项实验表明,从展示中选择一个物品会使下一个物品更有可能是同一类型。如果目标由颜色和形状等基本特征定义,这种模式成立,但如果由其身份定义(例如字母p和d)则不然。此外,在搜索过程中在不同目标类型之间切换在时间上代价高昂,如果目标类型改变,连续选择之间的反应时间会比目标类型相同时更长。最后,在这些觅食任务中决定离开一个屏幕/区域去下一个屏幕与最优觅食理论的预测并不完全一致。这些混合觅食研究的结果为先前选择历史通常如何指导后续视觉搜索提供了新的视角。