• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

混合价值觅食:目标价值如何塑造人类觅食行为。

Hybrid value foraging: How the value of targets shapes human foraging behavior.

作者信息

Wolfe Jeremy M, Cain Matthew S, Alaoui-Soce Abla

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Visual Attention Lab, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Apr;80(3):609-621. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1471-x.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-017-1471-x
PMID:29270798
Abstract

In hybrid foraging, observers search visual displays for multiple instances of multiple target types. In previous hybrid foraging experiments, although there were multiple types of target, all instances of all targets had the same value. Under such conditions, behavior was well described by the marginal value theorem (MVT). Foragers left the current "patch" for the next patch when the instantaneous rate of collection dropped below their average rate of collection. An observer's specific target selections were shaped by previous target selections. Observers were biased toward picking another instance of the same target. In the present work, observers forage for instances of four target types whose value and prevalence can vary. If value is kept constant and prevalence manipulated, participants consistently show a preference for the most common targets. Patch-leaving behavior follows MVT. When value is manipulated, observers favor more valuable targets, though individual foraging strategies become more diverse, with some observers favoring the most valuable target types very strongly, sometimes moving to the next patch without collecting any of the less valuable targets.

摘要

在混合觅食中,观察者会在视觉展示中搜索多种目标类型的多个实例。在之前的混合觅食实验中,尽管存在多种类型的目标,但所有目标的所有实例都具有相同的价值。在这种情况下,边际价值定理(MVT)能够很好地描述行为。当即时采集率降至平均采集率以下时,觅食者会离开当前的“斑块”去寻找下一个斑块。观察者的特定目标选择受到先前目标选择的影响。观察者倾向于选择同一目标的另一个实例。在当前的研究中,观察者会觅食四种目标类型的实例,其价值和流行程度可能会有所不同。如果价值保持不变而流行程度受到操控,参与者始终会表现出对最常见目标的偏好。离开斑块的行为遵循边际价值定理。当价值受到操控时,观察者会偏向更有价值的目标,不过个体的觅食策略会变得更加多样,一些观察者会非常强烈地偏向最有价值的目标类型,有时甚至不采集任何价值较低的目标就转移到下一个斑块。

相似文献

1
Hybrid value foraging: How the value of targets shapes human foraging behavior.混合价值觅食:目标价值如何塑造人类觅食行为。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Apr;80(3):609-621. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1471-x.
2
Hybrid foraging search: Searching for multiple instances of multiple types of target.混合觅食搜索:搜索多种类型目标的多个实例。
Vision Res. 2016 Feb;119:50-9. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.12.006. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
3
Hybrid foraging search in younger and older age.老年和年轻个体中的混合觅食搜索。
Psychol Aging. 2019 Sep;34(6):805-820. doi: 10.1037/pag0000387. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
4
Using the past to anticipate the future in human foraging behavior.
Vision Res. 2015 Jun;111(Pt A):66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
5
When is it time to move to the next raspberry bush? Foraging rules in human visual search.什么时候该转移到下一片覆盆子丛?人类视觉搜索中的觅食规则。
J Vis. 2013 Jan 1;13(3):10. doi: 10.1167/13.3.10.
6
No matter what you do, travel is travel in visual foraging.无论你做什么,旅行都是在进行视觉觅食。
Vision Res. 2024 Nov;224:108491. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2024.108491. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
7
Foraging with Anne Treisman: Features versus conjunctions, patch leaving and memory for foraged locations.与安妮·特雷斯曼一起觅食:特征与组合、离开觅食区域以及对觅食地点的记忆
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Feb;82(2):818-831. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01941-y.
8
How humans react to changing rewards during visual foraging.人类在视觉觅食过程中如何对不断变化的奖励做出反应。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Nov;79(8):2299-2309. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1411-9.
9
Guidance and selection history in hybrid foraging visual search.混合觅食视觉搜索中的引导与选择历史
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Apr;81(3):637-653. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-01649-5.
10
Looking ahead: When do you find the next item in foraging visual search?展望未来:在觅食视觉搜索中,你何时能找到下一个目标?
J Vis. 2020 Feb 10;20(2):3. doi: 10.1167/jov.20.2.3.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding human visual foraging: a review.理解人类视觉觅食:综述
Biol Cybern. 2025 Jul 23;119(4-6):20. doi: 10.1007/s00422-025-01020-6.
2
Picking the right piece: Action intentions shape visual search and action planning in human multi-target-foraging.挑选合适的目标:行动意图塑造人类多目标觅食中的视觉搜索和行动规划。
iScience. 2025 May 13;28(6):112656. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112656. eCollection 2025 Jun 20.
3
Foraging through emotions: emotional stimuli and participants' trait anxiety shape visual foraging.探索情绪:情绪刺激与参与者的特质焦虑塑造视觉探索行为。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 May 21;12(5):242175. doi: 10.1098/rsos.242175. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Attention directs actions in visual foraging.注意力引导视觉觅食中的行动。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 6;15(1):15788. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97986-1.
5
Grocery Shopping Under Simplified Marginal Value Theorem Predictions.简化边际价值定理预测下的食品杂货购物
Hum Nat. 2024 Dec;35(4):451-476. doi: 10.1007/s12110-024-09485-3. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
6
The effect of target scarcity on visual foraging.目标稀缺对视觉觅食的影响。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Dec 4;11(12):240060. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240060. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Risky hybrid foraging: The impact of risk, reward value, and prevalence on foraging behavior in hybrid visual search.有风险的混合觅食:风险、奖励价值和发生率对混合视觉搜索中觅食行为的影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Nov 14. doi: 10.1037/xge0001652.
8
No matter what you do, travel is travel in visual foraging.无论你做什么,旅行都是在进行视觉觅食。
Vision Res. 2024 Nov;224:108491. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2024.108491. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
9
Research on re-searching: interrupted foraging is not disrupted foraging.再研究之研究:中断觅食并未扰乱觅食。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 May 15;9(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00556-8.
10
Graded prioritisation of targets in search: reward diminishes the low prevalence effect.目标分级搜索中的优先化:奖励降低了低患病率效应。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Aug 4;8(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00507-9.