Crespo-Leiro Maria G, Stypmann Jörg, Schulz Uwe, Zuckermann Andreas, Mohacsi Paul, Bara Christoph, Ross Heather, Parameshwar Jayan, Zakliczyński Michal, Fiocchi Roberto, Hoefer Daniel, Colvin Monica, Deng Mario C, Leprince Pascal, Elashoff Barbara, Yee James P, Vanhaecke Johan
Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), SERGAS, Universidade da Coruña (UDC), A Coruña, Spain.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Eur Heart J. 2016 Sep 1;37(33):2591-601. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv682. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
A non-invasive gene-expression profiling (GEP) test for rejection surveillance of heart transplant recipients originated in the USA. A European-based study, Cardiac Allograft Rejection Gene Expression Observational II Study (CARGO II), was conducted to further clinically validate the GEP test performance.
Blood samples for GEP testing (AlloMap(®), CareDx, Brisbane, CA, USA) were collected during post-transplant surveillance. The reference standard for rejection status was based on histopathology grading of tissue from endomyocardial biopsy. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), negative (NPVs), and positive predictive values (PPVs) for the GEP scores (range 0-39) were computed. Considering the GEP score of 34 as a cut-off (>6 months post-transplantation), 95.5% (381/399) of GEP tests were true negatives, 4.5% (18/399) were false negatives, 10.2% (6/59) were true positives, and 89.8% (53/59) were false positives. Based on 938 paired biopsies, the GEP test score AUC-ROC for distinguishing ≥3A rejection was 0.70 and 0.69 for ≥2-6 and >6 months post-transplantation, respectively. Depending on the chosen threshold score, the NPV and PPV range from 98.1 to 100% and 2.0 to 4.7%, respectively.
For ≥2-6 and >6 months post-transplantation, CARGO II GEP score performance (AUC-ROC = 0.70 and 0.69) is similar to the CARGO study results (AUC-ROC = 0.71 and 0.67). The low prevalence of ACR contributes to the high NPV and limited PPV of GEP testing. The choice of threshold score for practical use of GEP testing should consider overall clinical assessment of the patient's baseline risk for rejection.
一种用于心脏移植受者排斥反应监测的非侵入性基因表达谱(GEP)检测起源于美国。一项基于欧洲的研究,即心脏同种异体移植排斥反应基因表达观察性II研究(CARGO II),旨在进一步对GEP检测性能进行临床验证。
在移植后监测期间采集用于GEP检测(AlloMap®,CareDx,美国加利福尼亚州布里斯班)的血样。排斥反应状态的参考标准基于心内膜心肌活检组织的组织病理学分级。计算GEP评分(范围0 - 39)的受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC - ROC)、阴性预测值(NPV)和阳性预测值(PPV)。将GEP评分34作为截断值(移植后>6个月),95.5%(381/399)的GEP检测为真阴性,4.5%(18/399)为假阴性,10.2%(6/59)为真阳性,89.8%(53/59)为假阳性。基于938对活检样本,用于区分≥3A排斥反应的GEP检测评分AUC - ROC在移植后≥2 - 6个月和>6个月时分别为0.70和0.69。根据所选的阈值评分,NPV和PPV范围分别为98.1%至100%和2.0%至4.7%。
在移植后≥2 - 6个月和>6个月时,CARGO II的GEP评分性能(AUC - ROC = 0.70和0.69)与CARGO研究结果(AUC - ROC = 0.71和0.67)相似。急性细胞性排斥反应的低患病率导致GEP检测的高NPV和有限的PPV。在实际应用GEP检测时,阈值评分的选择应考虑患者排斥反应基线风险的整体临床评估。