• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用基因表达筛选技术监测心脏移植受者急性细胞排斥反应的风险评估。

Risk evaluation using gene expression screening to monitor for acute cellular rejection in heart transplant recipients.

机构信息

Section of Heart Failure, Cardiac Transplant, and Mechanical Circulatory Support, and Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Ted Rogers Centre of Excellence in Heart Function, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Ted Rogers Centre of Excellence in Heart Function, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Jan;38(1):51-58. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2018.09.004
PMID:30352779
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gene expression profiling (GEP) was developed for non-invasive surveillance of acute cellular rejection. Despite its widespread use, there has been a paucity in outcome data for patients managed with GEP outside of clinical trials.

METHODS

The Outcomes AlloMap Registry (OAR) is an observational, prospective, multicenter study including patients aged ≥ 15 years and ≥ 55 days post-cardiac transplant. Primary outcome was death and a composite outcome of hemodynamically significant rejection, graft dysfunction, retransplantation, or death. Secondary outcomes included readmission rates and development of coronary allograft vasculopathy and malignancies.

RESULTS

The study included 1,504 patients, who were predominantly Caucasian (69%), male (74%), and aged 54.1 ± 12.9 years. The prevalence of moderate to severe acute cellular rejection (≥2R) was 2.0% from 2 to 6 months and 2.2% after 6 months. In the OAR there was no association between higher GEP scores and coronary allograft vasculopathy (p = 0.25), cancer (p = 0.16), or non-cytomegalovirus infection (p = 0.10). Survival at 1, 2, and 5 years post-transplant was 99%, 98%, and 94%, respectively. The composite outcome occurred in 103 patients during the follow-up period. GEP scores in dual-organ recipients (heart-kidney and heart-liver) were comparable to heart-alone recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

This registry comprises the largest contemporary cohort of patients undergoing GEP for surveillance. Among patients selected for GEP surveillance, survival is excellent, and rates of acute rejection, graft dysfunction, readmission, and death are low.

摘要

背景

基因表达谱分析(GEP)是为非侵入性监测急性细胞排斥反应而开发的。尽管它被广泛应用,但在临床试验之外,使用 GEP 管理的患者的结果数据却很少。

方法

Outcomes AlloMap 注册中心(OAR)是一项观察性、前瞻性、多中心研究,包括年龄≥15 岁和心脏移植后≥55 天的患者。主要结局是死亡和血液动力学显著排斥、移植物功能障碍、再次移植或死亡的复合结局。次要结局包括再入院率以及冠状动脉移植血管病和恶性肿瘤的发展。

结果

该研究纳入了 1504 名患者,他们主要是白种人(69%)、男性(74%)和 54.1±12.9 岁。2 至 6 个月和 6 个月后中度至重度急性细胞排斥反应(≥2R)的患病率分别为 2.0%和 2.2%。在 OAR 中,较高的 GEP 评分与冠状动脉移植血管病(p=0.25)、癌症(p=0.16)或非巨细胞病毒感染(p=0.10)之间没有关联。移植后 1、2 和 5 年的生存率分别为 99%、98%和 94%。在随访期间,有 103 名患者发生复合结局。双器官受体(心脏-肾脏和心脏-肝脏)的 GEP 评分与心脏单独受体相当。

结论

该注册中心包含了最大的接受 GEP 监测的当代患者队列。在接受 GEP 监测选择的患者中,生存率极好,急性排斥反应、移植物功能障碍、再入院和死亡的发生率较低。

相似文献

1
Risk evaluation using gene expression screening to monitor for acute cellular rejection in heart transplant recipients.利用基因表达筛选技术监测心脏移植受者急性细胞排斥反应的风险评估。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Jan;38(1):51-58. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
2
Gene expression profiling scores in dual organ transplant patients are similar to those in heart-only recipients.双器官移植患者的基因表达谱评分与仅接受心脏移植的患者相似。
Transpl Immunol. 2018 Aug;49:28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
3
Molecular testing for long-term rejection surveillance in heart transplant recipients: design of the Invasive Monitoring Attenuation Through Gene Expression (IMAGE) trial.心脏移植受者长期排斥反应监测的分子检测:通过基因表达进行侵入性监测衰减(IMAGE)试验的设计
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007 Aug;26(8):808-14. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.05.017.
4
Surveillance with dual noninvasive testing for acute cellular rejection after heart transplantation: Outcomes from the Surveillance HeartCare Outcomes Registry.心脏移植后采用双重非侵入性检测进行急性细胞排斥反应监测:来自 Surveillance HeartCare Outcomes 注册研究的结果。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Sep;43(9):1409-1421. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.05.003. Epub 2024 May 15.
5
Randomized pilot trial of gene expression profiling versus heart biopsy in the first year after heart transplant: early invasive monitoring attenuation through gene expression trial.心脏移植后第一年基因表达谱分析与心脏活检的随机试点试验:通过基因表达试验进行早期侵入性监测衰减
Circ Heart Fail. 2015 May;8(3):557-64. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.114.001658. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
6
Impact of cytomegalovirus infection on gene expression profile in heart transplant recipients.巨细胞病毒感染对心脏移植受者基因表达谱的影响。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021 Feb;40(2):101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.11.008. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
7
Performance of gene-expression profiling test score variability to predict future clinical events in heart transplant recipients.基因表达谱测试分数变异性在预测心脏移植受者未来临床事件中的表现。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015 Oct 9;15:120. doi: 10.1186/s12872-015-0106-1.
8
Gene expression profiling to study racial differences after heart transplantation.通过基因表达谱分析研究心脏移植后的种族差异。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 Jul;34(7):970-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2015.01.987. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
9
Comparison of cardiac allograft vasculopathy incidence between simultaneous multiorgan and isolated heart transplant recipients in the United States.美国同时进行多器官移植与单纯心脏移植受者之间心脏移植血管病变发生率的比较。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Oct;43(10):1737-1746. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.06.014. Epub 2024 Jun 29.
10
Clinical usefulness of gene-expression profile to rule out acute rejection after heart transplantation: CARGO II.基因表达谱在心脏移植后排除急性排斥反应中的临床应用:CARGO II研究。
Eur Heart J. 2016 Sep 1;37(33):2591-601. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv682. Epub 2016 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Molecular diagnostics for the monitoring of the cardiac allograft.用于监测心脏移植的分子诊断技术。
JHLT Open. 2025 Jul 25;10:100354. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100354. eCollection 2025 Nov.
2
Rejection Surveillance: Integrating Cell-Free DNA and Gene Expression Panels to Decrease Invasiveness in Routine Monitoring of Heart Transplant Recipients.排斥监测:整合游离DNA和基因表达检测板以降低心脏移植受者常规监测中的侵入性
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2025 May 15;21(3):51-57. doi: 10.14797/mdcvj.1578. eCollection 2025.
3
Diagnostic Performance of Gene Expression and dd-cfDNA in Multiorgan Transplant Recipients.
基因表达和数字滴度cfDNA在多器官移植受者中的诊断性能
Transplant Direct. 2025 Feb 21;11(3):e1772. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001772. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Current and emerging tools for simultaneous assessment of infection and rejection risk in transplantation.用于同时评估移植中感染和排斥风险的现有及新兴工具。
Front Immunol. 2024 Nov 26;15:1490472. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1490472. eCollection 2024.
5
European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) Consensus Statement on the Use of Non-invasive Biomarkers for Cardiothoracic Transplant Rejection Surveillance.欧洲器官移植学会(ESOT)关于使用非侵入性生物标志物进行心胸器官移植排斥监测的共识声明。
Transpl Int. 2024 Jun 11;37:12445. doi: 10.3389/ti.2024.12445. eCollection 2024.
6
Doppler echocardiography for surveillance of acute cardiac allograft rejection: a 28-year single-center experience.多普勒超声心动图用于监测心脏移植急性排斥反应:单中心28年经验
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2024 Feb 15;14(1):59-71. doi: 10.21037/cdt-23-305. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
7
Multidimensional assessment of the biological effects of electronic cigarettes on lung bronchial epithelial cells.电子烟对肺支气管上皮细胞的生物学效应的多维评估。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 23;14(1):4445. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55140-3.
8
Incidence of Acute Rejection Compared With Endomyocardial Biopsy Complications for Heart Transplant Patients in the Contemporary Era.当代心脏移植患者急性排斥反应发生率与心内膜心肌活检并发症的比较
Transplantation. 2024 May 1;108(5):1220-1227. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004882. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
9
Selection and Interpretation of Molecular Diagnostics in Heart Transplantation.心脏移植中的分子诊断选择与解读。
Circulation. 2023 Aug 22;148(8):679-694. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.062847. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
10
Comparison of two donor-derived cell-free DNA tests and a blood gene-expression profile test in heart transplantation.两种供体游离 DNA 检测方法与血液基因表达谱检测方法在心脏移植中的比较。
Clin Transplant. 2023 Jun;37(6):e14984. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14984. Epub 2023 Apr 10.