Picavet H Susan J, Pas L Willemijn, van Oostrom Sandra H, van der Ploeg Hidde P, Verschuren W M Monique, Proper Karin I
Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 11;11(1):e0146639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146639. eCollection 2016.
Sedentary behaviors are reported to impose health risks. Since occupational exposure is a major proportion of total sedentary time, we studied the association between occupational sitting and a number of health problems.
From the longitudinal Doetinchem Cohort Study, we selected those working at baseline with complete data (n = 1,509). Participants were examined four times at 5 year-intervals between 1993 and 2012. We characterized occupational sitting as follows: 1) stable sitters and stable non sitters over a 15-year period, based on job characteristics and (2) having a job with a low, moderate or high amount of sitting, based on tertiles of self-reported number of hours per week of occupational sitting, measured at wave 5. Linear and logistic regression models were used. Outcomes were self-reported mental health, low-back or upper extremity pain, and objectively measured cardiometabolic health (overweight, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia).
Compared to stable non sitters, a lower risk of chronic upper extremity pain was observed for stable sitters (OR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.57; 1.00) as well as for those in the two upper tertiles for hours of occupational sitting (>4 hr/wk) (OR 0.65; 95%CI 0.50-0.86). For the other health outcomes studied, no significant associations were found with occupational sitting.
Our findings do not support the hypothesis that occupational sitting is associated with health problems. The finding that occupational sitting is associated with less upper extremity pain might be due to the association of occupational sitting with less physical load.
据报道,久坐行为会带来健康风险。由于职业暴露在总久坐时间中占很大比例,我们研究了职业性久坐与一系列健康问题之间的关联。
从纵向的多廷赫姆队列研究中,我们选取了基线时工作且数据完整的人员(n = 1509)。在1993年至2012年期间,参与者每隔5年接受4次检查。我们将职业性久坐定义如下:1)根据工作特征,在15年期间为稳定久坐者和稳定非久坐者;2)根据在第5波测量的自我报告的每周职业性久坐小时数的三分位数,将工作分为久坐时间少、中等或多的工作。使用线性和逻辑回归模型。结果包括自我报告的心理健康、腰背痛或上肢疼痛,以及客观测量的心脏代谢健康(超重、高血压、高胆固醇血症)。
与稳定非久坐者相比,稳定久坐者患慢性上肢疼痛的风险较低(比值比0.75,95%置信区间:0.57;1.00),职业性久坐时间处于两个较高三分位数(>4小时/周)的人也是如此(比值比0.65;95%置信区间0.50-0.86)。对于所研究的其他健康结果,未发现与职业性久坐有显著关联。
我们的研究结果不支持职业性久坐与健康问题相关的假设。职业性久坐与上肢疼痛较少相关这一发现可能是由于职业性久坐与身体负荷较小有关。